Thread: Paper Tigers

  1. #191
    W. Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Videodrome
    Posts
    12,745
    Style
    Mixed
    3
    P. 400, "The Wizard of Fu", Part Two

    The first time I summarized this article, I missed some nuance. It is one of the better essays in the book, and Allan saved it for the end.

    It began with a story about Ondash attending a "Shaolin Kung Fu school" with a "colored belt system" and "personalized training manuals". My immediate thought was Shaolin-Do or something similar. The essay discusses his experience with the "closed door" teaching instruction method common in TMA, where an allegedly skilled master will take special students behind a "closed door" in order to teach them elite level skills.

    Ondash discovered through a friend some 8mm footage of the Shaolin master intended to become training material for disciples/franchisees, and was shocked to discover the old man was "ham-fisted" and had "no waist, nor any other kind of consistent stationary, turning, tilting, or rooting power."

    But before the reader can begin to nod their head in agreement, Allan expounds further, getting technical on us.

    "most of his power was obviously muscularly driven"
    "his external yin and yan was out of whack due to the fact that he always retracted his guard hands long before his striking hands reached their full extensions."
    Ondash begins to pontificate on how easy it must be to hide lack of ability using the open/closed door teaching method, especially if what's available to closed door students isn't always anything special.

    "One must consider that if he or she is new to martial arts, or has no one else to compare their teacher to, then they most likely would not become aware of the fact that the teacher might be poorly skilled
    OK."
    "Since he (a head instructor) practices in private and creates the illusion that he is superior, his students will never be given the chance to consider that he may have any bad habits at all. Not that they would anyway, but still, not knowing really sucks for them"
    Naturally, this skeptic did what anyone else would have done when presented with the fact that his master might be a big faker. He dumped everything he'd already learned and traveled to Chinatown, Philadelphia to find true Northern and Southern Shaolin Kung Fu. It only took a few days with his new Shaolin master for Allan to "feel extreme power in everything I did."

    Allan then describes the dissonance between the schools, trying to come up with a rationale. He reasons that his old instructor sucked and made mistakes, which had made Allan suck at kung fu. His new Shaolin teacher had immediately fixed everything because he had the real Shaolin kung fu. On his ex-instructor, Allan laments his old classmates as, "the ones who continue to suffer under his rule".

    The essay ends with Allan pondering the value of training in "seclusion", and not practicing in front of others, as a way of introducing bad habits. He gives an anecdote about a class where he was challenged by students for saying one thing but doing another, and responded with a common MA instructor cliche, "Do as I say, not as I do".

    Ultimately, Allan's essay (the last in the book) seems to provide valuable advice, buried in his usual heap of pseudoscience bullshit and MMA hating: hiding your training from other, training alone, or training without someone to fix your own mistakes, is a great way to suck. And if you're an instructor, you will only pass that suck onto students.

    And if school is designed to cost more for secret, arcane, back room instruction that no one else is allowed to see...walk away.

    "It is only fair to warn all the Dorothy's, Tin Mans, Lions, and Scarecrows out there that the person behind the curtain may not be who he or she appears to be".

    Final Grade: B+
    Last edited by W. Rabbit; 10/10/2017 6:01pm at .

  2. #192

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    7,352
    Style
    Prying Mantis Kung-f, SBD
    2
    Do it again.
    Dan Severn loves raping people.

  3. #193
    BackFistMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sinsinnatti Oh Hi Ho
    Posts
    14,653
    Style
    all things in Moderation
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by W. Rabbit View Post
    P. 400, "The Wizard of Fu", Part Two

    The first time I summarized this article, I missed some nuance. It is one of the better essays in the book, and Allan saved it for the end.

    It began with a story about Ondash attending a "Shaolin Kung Fu school" with a "colored belt system" and "personalized training manuals". My immediate thought was Shaolin-Do or something similar. The essay discusses his experience with the "closed door" teaching instruction method common in TMA, where an allegedly skilled master will take special students behind a "closed door" in order to teach them elite level skills.

    Ondash discovered through a friend some 8mm footage of the Shaolin master intended to become training material for disciples/franchisees, and was shocked to discover the old man was "ham-fisted" and had "no waist, nor any other kind of consistent stationary, turning, tilting, or rooting power."

    But before the reader can begin to nod their head in agreement, Allan expounds further, getting technical on us.





    Ondash begins to pontificate on how easy it must be to hide lack of ability using the open/closed door teaching method, especially if what's available to closed door students isn't always anything special.





    Naturally, this skeptic did what anyone else would have done when presented with the fact that his master might be a big faker. He dumped everything he'd already learned and traveled to Chinatown, Philadelphia to find true Northern and Southern Shaolin Kung Fu. It only took a few days with his new Shaolin master for Allan to "feel extreme power in everything I did."

    Allan then describes the dissonance between the schools, trying to come up with a rationale. He reasons that his old instructor sucked and made mistakes, which had made Allan suck at kung fu. His new Shaolin teacher had immediately fixed everything because he had the real Shaolin kung fu. On his ex-instructor, Allan laments his old classmates as, "the ones who continue to suffer under his rule".

    The essay ends with Allan pondering the value of training in "seclusion", and not practicing in front of others, as a way of introducing bad habits. He gives an anecdote about a class where he was challenged by students for saying one thing but doing another, and responded with a common MA instructor cliche, "Do as I say, not as I do".

    Ultimately, Allan's essay (the last in the book) seems to provide valuable advice, buried in his usual heap of pseudoscience bullshit and MMA hating: hiding your training from other, training alone, or training without someone to fix your own mistakes, is a great way to suck. And if you're an instructor, you will only pass that suck onto students.

    And if school is designed to cost more for secret, arcane, back room instruction that no one else is allowed to see...walk away.


    Final Grade: B+
    Quote Originally Posted by Holy Moment View Post
    Do it again.
    What ? HUH WHAT!??!?!?! You think Rabbit is your fucking dancing Monkey? I am your fucking dancing monkey boy

    HERE TAKE!
    P. 400, "The Wizard of Fu", Part Two

    The first time I summarized this article, I missed some nuance. It is one of the better essays in the book, and Allan saved it for the end.

    It began with a story about Ondash attending a "Shaolin Kung Fu school" with a "colored belt system" and "personalized training manuals". My immediate thought was Shaolin-Do or something similar. The essay discusses his experience with the "closed door" teaching instruction method common in TMA, where an allegedly skilled master will take special students behind a "closed door" in order to teach them elite level skills.

    Ondash discovered through a friend some 8mm footage of the Shaolin master intended to become training material for disciples/franchisees, and was shocked to discover the old man was "ham-fisted" and had "no waist, nor any other kind of consistent stationary, turning, tilting, or rooting power."

    But before the reader can begin to nod their head in agreement, Allan expounds further, getting technical on us.





    Ondash begins to pontificate on how easy it must be to hide lack of ability using the open/closed door teaching method, especially if what's available to closed door students isn't always anything special.





    Naturally, this skeptic did what anyone else would have done when presented with the fact that his master might be a big faker. He dumped everything he'd already learned and traveled to Chinatown, Philadelphia to find true Northern and Southern Shaolin Kung Fu. It only took a few days with his new Shaolin master for Allan to "feel extreme power in everything I did."

    Allan then describes the dissonance between the schools, trying to come up with a rationale. He reasons that his old instructor sucked and made mistakes, which had made Allan suck at kung fu. His new Shaolin teacher had immediately fixed everything because he had the real Shaolin kung fu. On his ex-instructor, Allan laments his old classmates as, "the ones who continue to suffer under his rule".

    The essay ends with Allan pondering the value of training in "seclusion", and not practicing in front of others, as a way of introducing bad habits. He gives an anecdote about a class where he was challenged by students for saying one thing but doing another, and responded with a common MA instructor cliche, "Do as I say, not as I do".

    Ultimately, Allan's essay (the last in the book) seems to provide valuable advice, buried in his usual heap of pseudoscience bullshit and MMA hating: hiding your training from other, training alone, or training without someone to fix your own mistakes, is a great way to suck. And if you're an instructor, you will only pass that suck onto students.

    And if school is designed to cost more for secret, arcane, back room instruction that no one else is allowed to see...walk away.
    Now who is your dancing monkey?
    Yeah, that's what I thought!
    I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out.
    BILL HICKS,
    1961-1994

    Quote Originally Posted by Jean Paula-Satire
    Never believe that the GOP and fellow bigots are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The bigots and Republicans have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past and that besides, they have already won

  4. #194
    W. Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Videodrome
    Posts
    12,745
    Style
    Mixed
    Pick a number, monkey. Trust me, it's worth it.

  5. #195
    BackFistMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sinsinnatti Oh Hi Ho
    Posts
    14,653
    Style
    all things in Moderation
    Quote Originally Posted by W. Rabbit View Post
    Pick a number, monkey. Trust me, it's worth it.
    217 plz
    I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out.
    BILL HICKS,
    1961-1994

    Quote Originally Posted by Jean Paula-Satire
    Never believe that the GOP and fellow bigots are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The bigots and Republicans have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past and that besides, they have already won

  6. #196
    W. Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Videodrome
    Posts
    12,745
    Style
    Mixed
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by BackFistMonkey View Post
    217 plz
    "To Spar or Not to Spar".

    Oh god, I read three sentences. This one's going to be a lot harder than the last one. Give us time, ...the bridge is smashed.

  7. #197
    BackFistMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sinsinnatti Oh Hi Ho
    Posts
    14,653
    Style
    all things in Moderation
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by W. Rabbit View Post
    "To Spar or Not to Spar".

    Oh god, I read three sentences. This one's going to be a lot harder than the last one. Give us time, ...the bridge is smashed.
    yOU THINK thiS is SOMe random reuqst!?!
    Mush Rabbit Mush !!

    HAHAHHAHAH!
    I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out.
    BILL HICKS,
    1961-1994

    Quote Originally Posted by Jean Paula-Satire
    Never believe that the GOP and fellow bigots are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The bigots and Republicans have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past and that besides, they have already won

  8. #198
    W. Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Videodrome
    Posts
    12,745
    Style
    Mixed
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by BackFistMonkey View Post
    yOU THINK thiS is SOMe random reuqst!?!
    Mush Rabbit Mush !!

    HAHAHHAHAH!
    "sparring (free fighting) is one of the worst things a practioner can do to try and gain true fighting ability."
    (p. 216).

    I have to read this essay inch by inch. It's not easy.

  9. #199
    BackFistMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sinsinnatti Oh Hi Ho
    Posts
    14,653
    Style
    all things in Moderation
    oh yes context is berry berry important.
    Otherwise wisdom will be lost.
    I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out.
    BILL HICKS,
    1961-1994

    Quote Originally Posted by Jean Paula-Satire
    Never believe that the GOP and fellow bigots are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The bigots and Republicans have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past and that besides, they have already won

  10. #200
    Chili Pepper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,453
    Style
    Siling Labuyo Arnis
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by W. Rabbit View Post
    I have to read this essay inch by inch. It's not easy.
    The ancient CMA method of eye-toughening.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in