Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1point2: Ch-ch-ch-chaaaanges

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cy Q. Faunce
    replied
    Originally posted by Cy Q. Faunce View Post
    You, needless to say, are not invited.
    Actually, that's technically not true. You have 100 posts and are thus entitled to make contributions.

    You could do that, and if you have something worth saying, I suggest you do it there, BomberH.

    If you don't, then STFU.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cy Q. Faunce
    replied
    Originally posted by Snake Plissken View Post
    Perhaps I misunderstood the intent of the tags, then?
    I'll let staff answer that one. I could be wrong.

    People keep mistaking me for a Bullshido.net admin. I'm a wiki janitor.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cy Q. Faunce
    replied
    Originally posted by Munacra View Post
    Don't forget your contributions to the wonderful tharuz.com.

    What happened to that kid anyway?
    http://encyclopediadramatica.com/An_hero

    That's my best guess.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cy Q. Faunce
    replied
    Originally posted by 1point2 View Post
    His 6 month ban is over. He could come back if he wanted.
    pleasedon'tsaythatpleasedon'tsaythatpleasepleaseju stdon'tsaythat

    Leave a comment:


  • Snake Plissken
    replied
    Originally posted by Cy Q. Faunce View Post
    I don't believe that is true. Certainly there is no effort to make sure such tags reflect current practice; it would be prohibitively difficult to do so.
    Perhaps I misunderstood the intent of the tags, then?

    Leave a comment:


  • 1point2
    replied
    Originally posted by Munacra View Post
    Don't forget your contributions to the wonderful tharuz.com.

    What happened to that kid anyway?
    His 6 month ban is over. He could come back if he wanted.

    Leave a comment:


  • Munacra
    replied
    Don't forget your contributions to the wonderful tharuz.com.

    What happened to that kid anyway?

    Leave a comment:


  • Cy Q. Faunce
    replied
    Originally posted by Snake Plissken View Post
    Point of note:

    The Instructor tags are designated to show authority on a subject by proving to Staff you are actively instructing in the designated stylefield,
    I don't believe that is true. Certainly there is no effort to make sure such tags reflect current practice; it would be prohibitively difficult to do so.

    1point2 was an instructor and has presumably not unlearned the lessons of teaching in the last few weeks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cy Q. Faunce
    replied
    Originally posted by BomberH View Post
    a bunch of crap
    Seriously, shut the fuck up.

    I've worked harder to make the wiki complete than you know. Go look at http://www.bullshido.org/Category:Investigations and count the articles; all but five were put on the wiki by me. You may find it hard to complete the count, since it exceeds the number of fingers on your hands, but get someone smart to help you, if you know one.

    Don't tell me what Bullshido is about. Go look at http://www.bullshido.org/Richard_Guerra and see for yourself. That was my investigation and my article. That was exposing a fraud. When you've done something like that for the site, you can talk to me about the mission here. Until then, the words you want are: "Thank you, and sorry to bother you." I suggest you use them if you address me again.

    I'm trying to offer 1point2 a consolation and some recognition, not fight him further. There's nothing to accomplish by doing that. I'd like him to have s stake in the wiki. Ideally, I'd like all the contributing users to have one; that way they care about it and help to make it better. I can't do it all on my own.

    You, needless to say, are not invited.

    Leave a comment:


  • Snake Plissken
    replied
    Point of note:

    The Instructor tags are designated to show authority on a subject by proving to Staff you are actively instructing in the designated stylefield, so one might take said advice provided by a "tagged Instructor" as somewhat reliable, the "arguing from a point of authority" line bandied about frequently.

    If Staff determines the tag should or should not stay is a relevant point as 1.2's stylefield currently shows, if memory serves, former Isshinry and current Judo and BJJ or MMA, leading one to possibly believe he is an instructor of one or both or all.

    Leave a comment:


  • BomberH
    replied
    Originally posted by Cy Q. Faunce View Post
    Look, I'll cut to the chase and stop the idiotic speculation:

    I'm a wiki administrator. Some of Bullshido's instructors are listed on a page in the wiki: http://www.bullshido.org/Category:Bullshido_Instructors

    If you're an instructor, you might want to make yourself a page on the wiki under your username. At the end of that page, put the following tag on a line by itself:

    [[Category:Bullshido Instructors|1point2]]

    No, the category doesn't signify people who teach bullshido; it signifies Bullshido members who are also instructors. Omega's on the list, as are many other respected members.

    This is not mandatory. I'm just trying to improve the wiki. If you plan to keep the tag, and I know of no reason why you should not, please consider putting up such a page.

    Bullshit. You were just continuing to verbally beat up on a guy who already quit his former martial art after an on line beating. If you wanted to inform him of a new wiki, you'd have said "hey we've got a new wiki".

    Bullshido is about exposing fraud and bullshit. It isn't about bullying people. Poor show to kick a man whilst he's down. That sort of behaviour is only allowed in Japan (e.g. Pride)!

    Leave a comment:


  • Cy Q. Faunce
    replied
    Look, I'll cut to the chase and stop the idiotic speculation:

    I'm a wiki administrator. Some of Bullshido's instructors are listed on a page in the wiki: http://www.bullshido.org/Category:Bullshido_Instructors

    If you're an instructor, you might want to make yourself a page on the wiki under your username. At the end of that page, put the following tag on a line by itself:

    [[Category:Bullshido Instructors|1point2]]

    No, the category doesn't signify people who teach bullshido; it signifies Bullshido members who are also instructors. Omega's on the list, as are many other respected members.

    This is not mandatory. I'm just trying to improve the wiki. If you plan to keep the tag, and I know of no reason why you should not, please consider putting up such a page.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cy Q. Faunce
    replied
    Originally posted by BomberH View Post
    Grow up and stop being sanctimonious.
    Shut the fuck up. You're useless.

    Originally posted by BomberH View Post
    PS please remove Judo from your style until you have a rank or achievement of any merit.
    That's not how the style field works. Otherwise your style field would read "Shitposter".

    Leave a comment:


  • Cy Q. Faunce
    replied
    Originally posted by Sang View Post
    I take it where you are going with this is that you want 1.2's tag revoked?
    In fact, no. You and BomberH can shut the fuck up now. I don't think that is how the tag works, anyway. I think it is for having been an instructor, whether or not one is an instructor now.

    I'm just wondering if he still wants the tag. I'm not sure how he feels about the whole thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sang
    replied
    Originally posted by Cy Q. Faunce View Post
    Final point of business:

    1point2, are you still an instructor? I see you still have the tag.
    I take it where you are going with this is that you want 1.2's tag revoked? While we're at it let's remove all the amateur fighter tags from people who have stopped fighting... its just a fucking tag. Tags do not define you on this site, if they did you would have one which says "Whiney Bitch".
    Last edited by Sang; 7/08/2009 6:29am, .

    Leave a comment:

Collapse

Edit this module to specify a template to display.

Working...
X