Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wing Chun vs other MA's fitness standards

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Where I come from there was this double principle: fast to teach the basics but years to master the advanced stuff.

    Which is, again, nothing -ing -un specific.

    There was talk, and even a book about "making a fighter in 6 months" if I remember right, though... ;-)

    CLICK & WATCH
    :
    I got BULLSHIDO ON TV!!!

    "Bruce Lee sucks because I slammed my nuts with nunchucks trying to do that stupid shit back in the day. I still managed to have two kids. I forgive you Bruce.
    " - by Vorpal

    Comment


      Is this in anyway related to this: Keith R Kernspecht - Bltz Defence.

      I know nothing about the blitz defense but I thought it was supposed to be simple and Wing Tsun based.

      Comment


        This is what I found on youtube for blitz defense. It is uberdeadly!

        YouTube - prog blitz defence 10 WingTsun Leung Ting

        Comment


          Originally posted by M1K3 View Post
          Is this in anyway related to this: Keith R Kernspecht - Bltz Defence.

          I know nothing about the blitz defense but I thought it was supposed to be simple and Wing Tsun based.
          B.D. is Kernspecht's brainchild, copyrighted, if I'm not mistaken. (I've always found it distasteful for a post-WWII German to use the word "Blitz" on anything for sale...)

          The video you linked to IMO doesn't show B.D., it's just a usual WT demo thing, with folks lacking devoted attacks and falling over easily.

          I've only encountered B.D. on a few lessons at the EWTO here in Slovakia and I was explained it's a set of basic reactions/approaches in street brawl scenarios, where you can act like the victim in the eyes of any bystanders/witnesses.

          In theory, B.D. is defence using WT techniques, making it clear the other guy attacked you and not vice versa, for possible legal purposes...



          And I was hinting at this ("To be an aggressive fighter within 6 months"):
          Last edited by Tonuzaba; 2/20/2009 2:25am, .

          CLICK & WATCH
          :
          I got BULLSHIDO ON TV!!!

          "Bruce Lee sucks because I slammed my nuts with nunchucks trying to do that stupid shit back in the day. I still managed to have two kids. I forgive you Bruce.
          " - by Vorpal

          Comment


            I tried reading this whole thread, I really did, but I stopped at around page 26 and skipped ahead.

            In regards to the the actual topic title of WC fitness levels...After experiencing a solid 8 years of life getting sucked out from me at the hands of the Chun, I quit at the end of 2007. 2008 was my last year of high school (AUS School year goes Feb to Nov) and I played my first ever season of a sport (Rugby), and near the end of the year I actually lost weight. How much weight? Around 17kg/37 pounds from my 101kg/222 pound starting weight.

            So I actually started becoming healthier upon dropping WC. In fact, I've become more confident in life, and I'm probably a bit better off in an altercation using a poor imitation of the basic fundamentals of Judo/BJJ/MT/Boxing, than what 8 years of WC would have me do.

            This provides enough circumstantial evidence to infer that doing no art whatsoever is actually better than doing the _hun.

            Comment


              Good story, but that would be anecdotal evidence as far as this discussion goes. I am being intentionally picky because one of the major flaws of WC is using crappy psuedo-science. The tools of reason are a great thing. Chunners seem to really need todevelop them.

              Comment


                Well if you're going to be pedantic it technically counts as circumstantial unless we're disputing the validity of the provided anecdotes, furthermore, weight loss in and of itself is hard fact. The combined improvements in my life (some a matter of personal opinion, granted) are a sufficient collection of facts to prove that I was better off dropping WC, thus making it circumstantial evidence.

                If you're going to be picky, it's also pseudoscience. If you drop a statement of fact about the unscientific like nature of their supposed scientific approaches to their art (which I've never seen anyone attempt to peddle during all my years of WC) then mentioning why their methodology is crappy would be less redundant than 'The tools of reason are a great thing.,' in an attempt to sound educated and aware of what you're talking about. To paraphrase you: Good opening sentences, yet your last two hardly count for shit as far as this discussion goes.

                In fact, looking back on it now, crappy pseudo-science can hardly be construed as a one of the major flaws of WC. Certainly the lack of ground game, the awkward chain punches, the drills with totally compliant opponents, the sparring with Wing Chun vs another Wing Chun user and finally the chi sao pale in comparison to the godly flaw you've pointed out.

                Forgive me for this, but I can't take you seriously if you can't add one space worth of punctuation after completing your post, or bother to change the spelling of one typo.

                Comment


                  They may be facts to you, but without any corroboration they're just stories to us.

                  You have to understand, _ing _un is replete with anecdotes about how sifu disabled 10 attackers armed with nothing but chain punches and a smug shit eating grin (seriously, watch any _un video. You must get one with your black fucking sash or something). To give your anecdote credence would be an unacceptable double standard, even if we do agree with its conclusions.

                  Comment


                    Thanks Lu, better rebuttal then I would have had.

                    Obesely, I am serious about the pseudoscience and I am basing this on arguments I have heard from chunners. I also believe arts such as wrestling, boxing, judo, bjj have well developed theories with sound science. Concepts like using leverage and getting power from your hips are validated by results and help clarify key concepts in these arts.

                    The reason I was being picky about your post was an effort to be consistent as Lu pointed out above. Your story does sound consistent with what I have seen and heard of WC. I hope I didn't personally offend. If you did read the whole thread you will see I am being consistent. Also, this traces back to my frustration with comments (not from you) about arts "working only in theory". This admittedly is a pet peeve and I don't take it or myself too seriously.

                    Also, your age made me want to be a proponent of reason to someone who has the best martial art years ahead of you. No intention to condescend, though it is tough to not do so for a guy in middle age land.

                    Comment


                      Well, Lu/Mike. I do feel ashamed of myself now. My bitchy, overly sensitive response was probably indicative of my age/immaturity, but I do understand the need to keep standards when analysing/discussing things within the MA world etc.

                      You will have to forgive me, young as I may be, I have spent the better part of my MA youth in the vile clutches of the Chun, and I tend to fire up and lose my rationale when discussing it.

                      Comment


                        No problem. So if you like rugby, and disillusioned with the chun, are you looking for another art?

                        Comment

                        Collapse

                        Edit this module to specify a template to display.

                        Working...
                        X