Hey there everyone,
I came across this site and couldn't resist letting you all know that Wing Chun is better than most of you here are aware of. I have been at TRADITIONAL WING CHUN since 1993 and can easily say that I have never been beaten by a Karate, BJJ or TK fighter since, and I have tested my skills against these. I am not alone in this.
The problem lies with many people learning Modified WC and not getting the real system.
I myself have seen the huge gap between the effectiveness of Traditional vs Modified WC.
Having said this I think all martial arts have merit and often it comes down to the teacher and the student rather than the style.
I do think that many people here speak out of ignorance and fear rather than looking seriously at the pro's and con's of styles. IE: My style rocks and everyoner else sucks.
This is stupid and shows a huge lack of understanding and intelligence.
Yip Man in his later years taught Modified WC to many because he was an old opium addict and had cancer for some years before his death. A real shame. William Cheung has a complete WC system with the full range of techniques and footwork. Modified WC has half this.
Also the review and explanation of WC on this site is shallow, incomplete and obviously biased. Please update it with real facts. There is only a 'con's' list without the many many 'pro's' Traditional WC offers.
The 'episode' of Emin attacking William Cheung is not entirely correct. Yes he did take William down, but it was from behind, out of a crowd, by suprise. No man is superman. What you failed to mention was that William got up and then beat nine colours of crap out of Emin. Please tell the whole story.
It seems that this site is biased towards Karate, BJJ and other Japanese based styles. Please be a bit more even in your partiality.
If anyone wishes to discuss Traditional Wing Chun vs other styles with me, please do, if you want to rant about how WC sux and how your style kicks it's ass, the have a go, but you better comer with real backable facts, not 'frothing at the mouth' jingoism.
that is all, as you were,
WM
I came across this site and couldn't resist letting you all know that Wing Chun is better than most of you here are aware of. I have been at TRADITIONAL WING CHUN since 1993 and can easily say that I have never been beaten by a Karate, BJJ or TK fighter since, and I have tested my skills against these. I am not alone in this.
The problem lies with many people learning Modified WC and not getting the real system.
I myself have seen the huge gap between the effectiveness of Traditional vs Modified WC.
Having said this I think all martial arts have merit and often it comes down to the teacher and the student rather than the style.
I do think that many people here speak out of ignorance and fear rather than looking seriously at the pro's and con's of styles. IE: My style rocks and everyoner else sucks.
This is stupid and shows a huge lack of understanding and intelligence.
Yip Man in his later years taught Modified WC to many because he was an old opium addict and had cancer for some years before his death. A real shame. William Cheung has a complete WC system with the full range of techniques and footwork. Modified WC has half this.
Also the review and explanation of WC on this site is shallow, incomplete and obviously biased. Please update it with real facts. There is only a 'con's' list without the many many 'pro's' Traditional WC offers.
The 'episode' of Emin attacking William Cheung is not entirely correct. Yes he did take William down, but it was from behind, out of a crowd, by suprise. No man is superman. What you failed to mention was that William got up and then beat nine colours of crap out of Emin. Please tell the whole story.
It seems that this site is biased towards Karate, BJJ and other Japanese based styles. Please be a bit more even in your partiality.
If anyone wishes to discuss Traditional Wing Chun vs other styles with me, please do, if you want to rant about how WC sux and how your style kicks it's ass, the have a go, but you better comer with real backable facts, not 'frothing at the mouth' jingoism.
that is all, as you were,
WM
Comment