Hi. You are reading an archive of the legendary Bullshido forums, from 2002-2020. Please visit our NEW and (arguably) improved forums at https://forums.bullshido.net.
(Or don't, this is just an announcement and nobody's holding a gun to your head.)
I like who phill thinks an AH is any attack on the speaker AT ALL - an ad hom would be like Asia tells me how to apply a triangle, I say his opinion of a triangle doesn't matter because he wears pink like crockett and tubbs. . .you are doing it when you attack a person IN SPITE of their logical statement. Phil CHRONICALLY overuses the ideas of ad hom and appeal to authority - which is almost the opposite, it's when you try to reinforce the logic of a statement WITH your experience IN SPITE of your statement's lack of logic... he's very fond of explaining appeal to authority to anyone who questions his qualifications. . . not to mention both fallacies only really apply if the argument can't stand on its own - they don't come into play during debate of the argument itself.
Objectivists do not understand philosophy. At all. In every single academic department over the world, they are universally vilified as the retarded little brothers of the philosophy world. Anyone who professes belief in Ayn Rand's little system is a chronic failure as a philosopher.
I was banned from Pax for posting here. Not for anything I said at Pax. I never insulted Phil's fat out of shape lard assness unitl I was banned. After being banned I gave up on all tactfullness.
Way too many RBSDers like a closed little circle jerk where their expertise can't be questioned. Inexperianced dumbasses reinforcing other inexperianced dumbasses opinions on things they NEVER pressure test. Their ego must need the constant stroking. MA and SD are a science. They need to check out a 7th grade science text book on the scientific method. They aren't even martial artists...
"The Tactical One." TTO was the scourage of Bladeforums.com for a time and was known for the outrageous things he would claim to have done. Under different guises he would appear to tell various ridiculous stories of his exploits. In one identity, for example, he claimed to have been attacked by a mugger armed with a Spyderco Civilian, nearly losing his arm in the process. I am not certain, but I believe I started the Field Guide to Trolls in response to his posts and it grew from there over the years.
When online fantasies intersect with real life, however, people like this seldom realize in just how much danger they're placing themselves. I heard from those involved about the incident in which "TTO" agreed to meet someone from the forum in real life, at a diner or coffee shop or wherever....
This got me to thinking about the posturing that goes on -- these guys who say things like, "As soon as I can borrow Mom's car, I'm driving down and meeting those guys from PB and showing them what a double-reverse-flywheel-scissor-underthwock-submission can do!" If you're ever tempted to do this -- if you're ever thinking, "what could it hurt to go meet someone from the Internet?" -- remember Han Solo. Remember that, before Lucas revised history, Solo had no problem meeting with Greedo in the seedy diner that was the Mos Eisley cantina.
That's because he had a gun under the table.
Funniest things about this post:
1) He is hacking on people for Internet braggadoccio. Him. Phil is. Wow.
2) The submission thing, that's supposed to be a hack on us, right? I don't know if it's funnier that he couldn't think of the name of a real submission to use or that we could scare up ten guys to throwdown with any of them and, if asked, they'd all be "cleaning their pieces" that evening.
3) Han Solo. Han FUCKING Solo.
My theories are proved correct. Phil is a Sci-Fi nerd who never got a chance to go to a big convention and get geek pussy. He would have been a harmless fanfic "publisher" then, and no one would have ever heard of him.
But due to a confluence of strange events, he got into Wing Chun and the mental reprogramming that WC's often seem to undergo occurred. He came to believe he was a bad-ass, rather than a geek with a weapons fixation.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:17 pm Post subject: Re: Jeet Kune Do Reply with quote
Phil Elmore wrote:
Tonight I start cross-training in Jeet Kune Do.
Let us know what you think of the art compared to your previous training. Hiya
_________________
Future explorers from other planets will walk this earthly wasteland and marvel at our stupidity and wonder why we could not accept the reality of our own finitude.
Ronald R. Harbers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Phil Elmore
Grand Nagus
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 4408
Location: New York
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
IX
Phasers on Stun
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 43
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:19 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
From what I understand Jeet Kun Do was merely Bruce Lee's training philosophy (use what works, throw out the rest). It wasn't a style at all. (Are you training with JKD Concepts, or some other organisation?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phil Elmore
Grand Nagus
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 4408
Location: New York
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:22 am Post subject: Reply with quote
That's too general an interpretation, in my opinion (though it is indeed the interpretation taken by the JKD Concepts people as I understand them). Jeet Kune Do has a specific curriculum (though this varies from instructor to instructor) and is indeed a style (no matter how much Bruce Lee tried to deny that it was).
We went over some of the basics tonight. There is a distinct kickboxing influence in this curriculum. The footwork is similar to Wing Chun, but a little less traditional and a little more aggressively athletic. Punching was likewise more influenced by boxing and kickboxing -- jabs, crosses, hooks, etc., though JKD does include the vertical fist of Wing Chun.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DeadManWalking
Order of the Bat'leth
Joined: 24 Apr 2004
Posts: 1059
Location: Texas
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:53 am Post subject: Reply with quote
I've always thought JKD was an amalgamation of expedient fighting techniques from a variety of martial arts styles, the idea being that it was direct and simple and almost anyone could do it. The way it was described to me at least.
In other words a real "assholes and elbows" style with elbow strikes, open palm strikes, low kicks, etc. I've heard that it's actually somewhat intuitive.
_________________
The fate of an empire depends on the moral education of its youth.
Aristotle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matt Bernius
Klingons off the Starboard Bow!
Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 81
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:19 am Post subject: Reply with quote
Phil,
Are you training with Sifu Erik Winfree? Or another syracuse JKD person?
- Matt
_________________
Matt Bernius
Renaissance Martial Arts
Wan Yi Chaun Kung Fu, Pekiti Tersia Kali, and what ever the heck works
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Phil Elmore
Grand Nagus
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 4408
Location: New York
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Phil Elmore
Grand Nagus
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 4408
Location: New York
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:17 am Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
I've always thought JKD was an amalgamation of expedient fighting techniques from a variety of martial arts styles, the idea being that it was direct and simple and almost anyone could do it. The way it was described to me at least.
In other words a real "assholes and elbows" style with elbow strikes, open palm strikes, low kicks, etc. I've heard that it's actually somewhat intuitive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
IX
Phasers on Stun
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 43
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:09 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
Phil Elmore wrote:
That's too general an interpretation, in my opinion (though it is indeed the interpretation taken by the JKD Concepts people as I understand them). Jeet Kune Do has a specific curriculum (though this varies from instructor to instructor) and is indeed a style (no matter how much Bruce Lee tried to deny that it was).
Well, I think of it like this: JKD is the philosophy, and some schools teach styles that are the results of following JKD. What most people mean when they speak of JKD is a style based on Bruce Lee's teachings, yes. It is something of a conflict between what the creator wanted the term to mean and how it is used these days...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phil Elmore
Grand Nagus
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 4408
Location: New York
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Matt Bernius
Klingons off the Starboard Bow!
Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 81
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:57 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
On topic:
Phil, your ideas seem more in line with Original JKD/JKD Nucleus. I'm just curious about that because Guro Seaman's down line is direct for Danny Inasanto. So I'd expect that your instructor was teaching concepts style.
In the concepts camp the general root of JKD is Jun Fan Kung Fu, the modified Wing Chun that Phil is talking about. But they do treat JKD as not having a hard and set grouping of techniques. Here's what Inasanto has said on the subject:
"Jeet Kune Do. Is it Jeet Kune Do? It's Jeet Kune Do for them. BUT IT IS NOT THE JEET KUNE DO OF BRUCE LEE. The Jeet Kune Do of Bruce Lee has the Jun Fan Gung Fu material in the beginning and then from there they are supposed to grow and expand, that is Jeet Kune Do. And it is different for every individual. So I would say, if you did that; put Karate and Aikido and Tae Kwon Do and maybe wrestling, that could be your Jeet Kune Do, that's correct. But it is not the JKD as devised or created by Bruce Lee. Because when you see he had the Jun Fan which he thought were the basics, important, and then expand and find your own Jeet Kune Do."
- Guro Dan Inosanto
The Original JKD/Former JKD Nucleus/Whatevertheheck they call themselves now, takes the approach that JKD is a specific system with set techniques.
Anyway, I was just curious.
- Matt
_________________
Matt Bernius
Renaissance Martial Arts
Wan Yi Chaun Kung Fu, Pekiti Tersia Kali, and what ever the heck works
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Satori
Jumpsuit-Wearing Guest Star
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 17
Location: California
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:59 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
While I've never studied JKD, I've always enjoyed Paul Vunak's view on expedient fighting, and the various "twists" he put on things. I remember reading about how to strengthen your "biting fighting" by wrapping a slap of steak in a t-shirt.
Thats just awesome.
I also liked the simplicity of the "Phase One: Distracting Strike, Phase Two: Unbalancing Flurry/Chain Punches, Phase Three: Fight Termination"
Good luck, and let us know how it goes.
May you achieve
Satori
_________________
"Those who speak, do not know. Those who know, do not speak." -Lao Tzu
"The more we sweat in peace, the less we bleed in war." -Sun Tzu
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phil Elmore
Grand Nagus
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 4408
Location: New York
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:13 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
What's nice is that I'll be able to build on my Wing Chun foundation while evolving with it -- so I don't have to discard it and start over (which would be difficult to do even if I switched to an art that was very different; I would not want to discard that foundation in any case because it is comprised of sound principles).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
IX
Phasers on Stun
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 43
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 9:13 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
Satori wrote:
I remember reading about how to strengthen your "biting fighting" by wrapping a slap of steak in a t-shirt.
Thats just awesome.
I really hope that's a joke (you never know with martial artists :/ ).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic The Martialist's Pax Baculum Forum Index -> Strategy & Tactics All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
Page 1 of 3
Watch this topic for replies
Post new topic Reply to topic The Martialist's Pax Baculum Forum Index -> Strategy & Tactics
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Phil Elmore
Grand Nagus
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 4408
Location: New York
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Satori
Jumpsuit-Wearing Guest Star
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 17
Location: California
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:53 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
I really hope that's a joke (you never know with martial artists :/ ).
Actually, it isn't a joke.
I thought that too until I read it, and he has some valid points.
For one, the only time you'd bite would be in a disadvantageous grappling position against a very aggressive, bigger/stronger attacker. Even then, it is primarily used as a method to move your opponent into a different position, rather than a fight ender.
Also, getting bit is very demoralizing and triggers a panic like reflex in us.
Sure, the grappling match was going your way. You achieved a mount, and leaned forward for a front naked choke. Just when you're about to secure it, your opponent leans forward and, in one clean bite, removes your nose.
Very creepy...but hey, you never know when you'll need to do it.
May you achieve
Satori
_________________
"Those who speak, do not know. Those who know, do not speak." -Lao Tzu
"The more we sweat in peace, the less we bleed in war." -Sun Tzu
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
senoBDEC
Ensign
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 104
Location: Davis, CA
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:31 am Post subject: Reply with quote
Re: biting.
Kelly Worden mentions it as well. Although... biting the forehead seems a really bad idea.
_________________
A great man once told me to pull up my zipper.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
fubar
It's life Jim, but not as we know it.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 376
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:49 am Post subject: Reply with quote
Early High School fistfight , before any serious training:
Huge fat guy takes me down - grappling sucks , I start to lose. His fat belly actually smothers me, panic that I can't breath - So I bit him , hard. never saw a fat guy fly straight up off the ground before.
I never forgot that little lesson.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
darkblood
Phasers on Stun
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 57
Location: Kamloops BC, Canada
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:36 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
Since this is a JKD thread, I've gotta put this in:
"Biting ... is efficient in close quarters. Don't make a plan of biting ... that is a good way to lose your teeth" -- Bruce Lee to James Franciscus in episode 2 of "Longstreet" (The Way of the Intercepting Fist)
I haven't had to bite anyone since early primary school, probably around grade 3 or 4. At the time I was being lifted off the ground, from behind, by the throat, by a guy who was known around our school for ambushing kids much smaller than him and hitting them long after they were down. I ripped a good sized chunk out of his forearm, and he dropped me fast, then he turned on one of my friends who had been trying to get him off me for the whole episode, so I hit him in the back of the head with a rock and we ran like all the demons of hell were on our tail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blackthorn54
Klingons off the Starboard Bow!
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 83
Location: NYC
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 5:35 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
I believe the tape on Biting put out by Vunak was called "Kino Mutai". Those that are really interested could try doing a Google search.
_________________
A Failure To Plan On YOUR Part, Does Not Constitute An Emergency on MY Part.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blackthorn54
Klingons off the Starboard Bow!
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 83
Location: NYC
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 5:38 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
Ahh, forget the Google search, I'm having a slow afternoon anyway...
http://www.geocities.com/jkdinstruct...ai.html?200529
_________________
A Failure To Plan On YOUR Part, Does Not Constitute An Emergency on MY Part.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dan webre
It's life Jim, but not as we know it.
Joined: 28 Mar 2004
Posts: 364
Location: New Orleans
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:57 pm Post subject: Your greatest weapon......... Reply with quote
" Your greatest weapon , is inside your enemies mind "- Buddha
Depending on the target , a bite can be more then just physical attack.
Biting someone's face for example will also attack one's vanity. It will also, more times then not , demoralize your enemy.
That will effect them on an emotional level. It can erode self esteem and as a by product , injure one's self confidence.
A great example would be" Holifield vs. Tyson". While it didnt happen in an S/D situation , it still effected Evander more then just physically.
The moe levels(physical, mental , emotional , and so on) your attack penetrates, the more effective you become............
Food for thought.............
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IX
Phasers on Stun
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 43
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:14 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
Phil Elmore wrote:
While I've never felt the urge to condition my biting abilities by chewing through cloth and cow meat, I don't know how you'd come up with a better simulation if you wanted to do so.
While biting obviously hurts, and makes the attacker think you're one crazy SOB, I can think of more useful ways to spend my training time than biting a t-shirt wrapped around a piece of dead animal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phil Elmore
Grand Nagus
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 4408
Location: New York
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
native
You Cannot Change the Laws of Physics!
Joined: 11 Nov 2004
Posts: 200
Location: “I hates rabbits!”
PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:53 am Post subject: Reply with quote
I read from the Dog Brothers to use your canine teeth. They had a whole article in Black Belt magazine. I think Fubar's example shows how it could be a decent last ditch option.
I never got around to practicing on a steak yet. Laughing
_________________
“Why, it's gettin so a man cain't earn a dishonest living no more!”
“Ya better say your prayers, ya flea-bitten varmint! I'm a-gonna blow ya to smithereenies!”
Yosemite Sam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
native
You Cannot Change the Laws of Physics!
Joined: 11 Nov 2004
Posts: 200
Location: “I hates rabbits!”
PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:00 am Post subject: Reply with quote
How effective do people think a well executed bite would be against a choke attempt, or even a grab?
_________________
“Why, it's gettin so a man cain't earn a dishonest living no more!”
“Ya better say your prayers, ya flea-bitten varmint! I'm a-gonna blow ya to smithereenies!”
Yosemite Sam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
utb1528
You Cannot Change the Laws of Physics!
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 159
Location: Detroit
PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:57 am Post subject: Reply with quote
Sweet avatar Native.
_________________
Survivalism is defined as the tactics and tools a motivated operator utilize to get home alive.
Lawrence Keeney
Comment