In another thread that was derailed, Grandmaster Hee Il Cho has been denigrated as both "some TKD fag", and as someone with no "actual fighting ability". Also, it was claimed that he is only known as a "point sparring" champion.
I maintain that he is a well-respected martial artist. His AIMAA organization endorses full-contact, hard training against fully-resisting opponents, with hand techniques that borrow heavily from boxing. (I've read the he was a competitive boxer at one time.) He teaches hard core Taekwondo with head punches and low kicking. Futhermore, although his organization is based on Taekwondo, takedowns and grappling are trained as an important part of the curriculuum, and are recoginzed as a necessary part of being a complete fighter.
In my opinion, these values are consistent with the message of Bullshido.
So, is AIMAA, (and by extension, Grandmaster Cho) the real deal? Or is AIMAA really just impressively packaged Bullshido?
Discuss. Prove me right or prove me wrong.
I maintain that he is a well-respected martial artist. His AIMAA organization endorses full-contact, hard training against fully-resisting opponents, with hand techniques that borrow heavily from boxing. (I've read the he was a competitive boxer at one time.) He teaches hard core Taekwondo with head punches and low kicking. Futhermore, although his organization is based on Taekwondo, takedowns and grappling are trained as an important part of the curriculuum, and are recoginzed as a necessary part of being a complete fighter.
In my opinion, these values are consistent with the message of Bullshido.
So, is AIMAA, (and by extension, Grandmaster Cho) the real deal? Or is AIMAA really just impressively packaged Bullshido?
Discuss. Prove me right or prove me wrong.
Comment