Stringfellow:
Oh do not get me wrong; I level no criticism towards you or anyone else posting evidence and issues involved in FSD. As I tried to suggest, it is a useful paradigm for understanding delusions in martial arts as well as other things.
My criticism is towards the individual who, despite all of this, insists on joining FSD. Now, that is his right, of course. Then he should go, train, and let people know the positive and negatives. Instead, he asks leading questions then reacts badlyto the answers. I really do not care if he is legitimate or not; he is a waste of attention. A serious man would simply train and come back and write about how everyone is either correct or wrong about FSD.
A wiseman would heed the warning of those who experienced before.
For intelligent men learn from mistakes, whereas wisemen learn from the mistakes of others.
--J.D.
Oh do not get me wrong; I level no criticism towards you or anyone else posting evidence and issues involved in FSD. As I tried to suggest, it is a useful paradigm for understanding delusions in martial arts as well as other things.
My criticism is towards the individual who, despite all of this, insists on joining FSD. Now, that is his right, of course. Then he should go, train, and let people know the positive and negatives. Instead, he asks leading questions then reacts badlyto the answers. I really do not care if he is legitimate or not; he is a waste of attention. A serious man would simply train and come back and write about how everyone is either correct or wrong about FSD.
A wiseman would heed the warning of those who experienced before.
For intelligent men learn from mistakes, whereas wisemen learn from the mistakes of others.
--J.D.
Comment