Originally posted by It is Fake
View Post
The burden of proof to deny Saucido's claim is not on Rigan.
Although I frankly wish Rigan would deny it.
And why would you ever tell anyone not to question or double check the details associated with a chain of evidence?
If the details are solid, then they will hold up.
If the investigation is done properly, such scrutiny by independent examiners is always welcomed because it improves the quality of the investigation.
Comment