Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

To Wing Chun or Not to Wing Chun is the question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    To Wing Chun or Not to Wing Chun is the question

    I have been learning Wing Chun for a year and a half and have recently started Muay Thai. My intention was to continue with both arts, but I have some serious doubts about the efficacy of WC and this comes out when I spar in WC classes because my style automatically reverts to more of MT.

    This may be because of my lack of understanding and I would like to hear from other WC practitioners (especially those with experience in other martial arts).

    My main concerns are as follows:
    1. Boxing/MT punches are much more powerful and have more refined defenses (chin down, shoulder protecting the vulnerable part of the head, etc)

    2. Is Chi Sao sensitivity useful against people who do not do chi sao themselves?

    3. I find the passive defense of MT more practical than the active blocking of WC especially against skilled opponents.

    For those of you who argue that I should learn a grappling art, I concur and hope to add that to my skill set in the future

    #2
    Look no further noob!

    http://www.bullshido.net/forums/show...threadid=10368

    I personally love wing chun, and I think it works very well with MT. Then again, maybe (a) your WC sifu is not good, (b) you are a bad wing chuner, or (c) wing chun is simply not your cup of tea, and you adapt more easily (for any number of reasons) to MT.

    If your situation fits into (c), above, you should indeed leave wing chun and concentrate on MT.

    If I am not mistaken, Prone also does wing chun, and he also regularly spars with MT guys.

    Comment


      #3
      What are your goals?

      If you want to be a better fighter, do MT.

      If you want to do pretty forms and chi sau, do WC.

      Pretty simple, really.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by HAPKO3
        What are your goals?

        If you want to be a better fighter, do MT.

        If you want to do pretty forms and chi sau, do WC.

        Pretty simple, really.

        Comment


          #5
          I did read and comment on your thread.

          It is clear, and backed up by all sorts of empirecal evidence, that MT training produces better fighters than WC training does.

          Period.

          Nothing to argue.

          Thus, if your goal is fighting efficiency, then MT is clearly a superior choice.

          If your goals are different, then it's a different question.

          You're not stupid. Why are you arguing?

          EDIT: No, I didn't comment on that one. You've started a bunch of WC/MT threads lately...
          Last edited by HAPKO3; 3/10/2004 1:09pm, .

          Comment


            #6

            Comment


              #7
              I think you misunderstood what I was saying. I can understand where you're coming from. 'Guess I'd be defensive too if I were in your shoes.

              I'm not bashing WC either.

              I'm just saying that if this guy wants to be the best fighter he can be, he shouldn't be doing it.

              WC can be great, fullfilling, whatever. And I'm sure there's good WC places that will teach you how to fight. They just won't teach you how to fight as well as training and competing in MT will. That's all.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by HAPKO3
                WC can be great, fullfilling, whatever. And I'm sure there's good WC places that will teach you how to fight. They just won't teach you how to fight as well as training and competing in MT will. That's all.

                Comment


                  #9
                  To wing_muay's 3 points After a year and a half you see to have learned nothing. Point by point:

                  Point 1. Here you state that there punches are more powerfull which is true but they leve them selfs more open when generating an all out punch.

                  Point 2. Yes absolutly Chi sau is perfect for those who don't know/understand it. Try it with a friend some time ask him to try to get to your face you should be able to stick and move him where you want. Just remember the 3 principals of Dan Chi-sau provided you were taught them.

                  Point 3. quote "active blocking of WC " there are no blocks in WC/T every thing is a failed puch From Tan sau to bong sau they should all have started as a punch.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    bullshit on the first 2 points.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Back it up

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Gladly. Come to San Diego in a couple of months.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Yeah ok Just explain your self

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Seriously, there's not much to explain. You list savate as one of your styles. You should know this.

                            The WC guard leaves the chin untucked = asking for trounble. When boxers/kickboxers throw punches, they use them to provide partial coverage for their face, WCers don't. This is all pretty basic stuff, really.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Re: To Wing Chun or Not to Wing Chun is the question

                              Originally posted by wing_muay
                              I have been learning Wing Chun for a year and a half and have recently started Muay Thai. My intention was to continue with both arts, but I have some serious doubts about the efficacy of WC and this comes out when I spar in WC classes because my style automatically reverts to more of MT.

                              This may be because of my lack of understanding and I would like to hear from other WC practitioners (especially those with experience in other martial arts).

                              My main concerns are as follows:
                              1. Boxing/MT punches are much more powerful and have more refined defenses (chin down, shoulder protecting the vulnerable part of the head, etc)

                              2. Is Chi Sao sensitivity useful against people who do not do chi sao themselves?

                              3. I find the passive defense of MT more practical than the active blocking of WC especially against skilled opponents.

                              For those of you who argue that I should learn a grappling art, I concur and hope to add that to my skill set in the future
                              1. Both have power the approaches are just different
                              2. Yes
                              3. There are no blocks in WC

                              Comment

                              Collapse

                              Edit this module to specify a template to display.

                              Working...
                              X