I have been looking closely at the various work that has been done by the Truther and Debunker communities on the Twin Tower collapses, trying to work it out for myself rationally.

I did some reading on progressive collapse in domino systems and confirmed my intuition that domino chains fall at a constant rate. I wondered whether

(up to about 1:00) YouTube- 02.mp4

YouTube- 33 Bricks World Record

YouTube- breaking 35 bricks

I'm working on quantifying the rate of collapse in the breaking demos, but my estimate so far are that it's pretty close.

This has implication for 9/11 research of any variety, because the official "Pancake Collapse" theory of the WTC collapse events would be constrained in the same way as the multi brick breaks above (ie: constrained to a constant rate of collapse). I am still digging for good measurememnts of what was actually observed, but I don't believe the towers actually fell at a constant rate. It seems they accelerated.

Food for thought.

No tinfoil hats please <:)

I did some reading on progressive collapse in domino systems and confirmed my intuition that domino chains fall at a constant rate. I wondered whether

**vertical**domino chains would also fall at a constant rate, and finally looked at these:(up to about 1:00) YouTube- 02.mp4

YouTube- 33 Bricks World Record

YouTube- breaking 35 bricks

I'm working on quantifying the rate of collapse in the breaking demos, but my estimate so far are that it's pretty close.

This has implication for 9/11 research of any variety, because the official "Pancake Collapse" theory of the WTC collapse events would be constrained in the same way as the multi brick breaks above (ie: constrained to a constant rate of collapse). I am still digging for good measurememnts of what was actually observed, but I don't believe the towers actually fell at a constant rate. It seems they accelerated.

Food for thought.

No tinfoil hats please <:)

## Comment