It seems like you derail your entire argument by admitting agnosticism. You can't be borderline anything as an Atheist, as atheism is the flat out denial of any god figure.
The fact that you'd admit most high IQ people are agnostic, which is accepting the possibility of a god figure exists but a way to quantify or obectively identify the exact boundries of god has yet to be found, shows that they are willing to believe in a god figure, whichever you pick.
The fact that they don't necessarily pick a specific god that they can or cannot prove does not have any correlation to the intellect of those that do. In science, that highly intellectual field, hypothesi must be made based on some amount of evidence and an idea for progression, an end state. The fact that the hypothesis has yet to be proven or disproven does not negate it, or make the question any less intellegent.
The fact that you'd admit most high IQ people are agnostic, which is accepting the possibility of a god figure exists but a way to quantify or obectively identify the exact boundries of god has yet to be found, shows that they are willing to believe in a god figure, whichever you pick.
The fact that they don't necessarily pick a specific god that they can or cannot prove does not have any correlation to the intellect of those that do. In science, that highly intellectual field, hypothesi must be made based on some amount of evidence and an idea for progression, an end state. The fact that the hypothesis has yet to be proven or disproven does not negate it, or make the question any less intellegent.
Comment