Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Breastfeeding ( NO JOKES)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Breastfeeding ( NO JOKES)

    While breastfedding has always been the prefered method in Europe, its not the 1st choice of many women in N.America.

    Here is the latest:

    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...2155&ncid=2155

    Babies should get breast milk only for 6 months, then add solids: doctors

    Tue Mar 8, 9:36 PM ET

    SHERYL UBELACKER

    TORONTO (CP) - Women should exclusively breastfeed their babies for the first six months without adding solid foods or formula in order to promote optimal health, the Canadian Pediatric Society recommends.




    The new guideline replaces previous advice that moms could add solid foods or formula to their babies' diet along with breastfeeding at four to six months, bringing the society in line with the World Health Organization (news - web sites), which recommended the six-month start time in 2001.


    Studies have shown that breast milk alone in an infant's first half-year of life confers increased health benefits for a longer period, said Dr. Margaret Boland, chair of the Canadian Pediatric Society's nutrition committee.


    "It means that we're not having mothers give babies infant cereal at four months, that we would like to extend the period where the baby's source of nutrition, the sole source of nutrition, is breast milk," Boland said Tuesday from Ottawa.


    "And it's going to exclude formulas and it's going to exclude any solids - cereals, fruits, vegetables, meats, any of the complementary infant foods."


    Breast milk contains antibodies that help babies fight off illness, said Boland, a pediatrician at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario. Exclusive breastfeeding for six months offers increased protection, in particular against gastrointestinal infections that can cause diarrhea.


    "When you introduce other food into the diet, you change some of the absorption of nutrients that babies get from their food," she said, noting that while jarred baby foods are sterile, cereals are not and may introduce micro-organisms into the infant's system.


    The executive director of La Leche League of Canada welcomed the society's decision to change its recommendation, which mirrors advice the group has always given the women it counsels.


    That's because starting solid foods earlier than six months can be detrimental, said Teresa Pitman, whose organization offers help to mothers who want to feed their infants naturally.


    "One of the ways breastfeeding protects babies is it changes the baby's intestine," Pitman said from Guelph, Ont. "When it's only breast milk going in, they have certain bacteria, healthy bacteria, growing in their intestines, and that helps to keep them healthy. Even a small amount of solid foods will change the lining of the intestine."


    WHO found significant differences in rates of infection when babies were fed solid foods before six months compared to those who weren't, she said.


    Still, Boland said it's crucial that babies in Canada who are being breastfed exclusively be given supplements of vitamin D - the sunshine vitamin - which is added to commercial foods and formula to prevent the bone-softening disease rickets.


    While 85 per cent of Canadian moms start off breastfeeding, only 19 per cent continue to do so exclusively up to six months, Statistics Canada figures show. The Canadian Pediatric Society says that along with introducing babies to solid foods no earlier than six months, breastfeeding can continue for up to two years and beyond.


    "We're still struggling with trying to get women to extend their duration of breastfeeding . . .," said Boland. "But how do we promote breastfeeding? Because we've got a commercial society and we're bombarded with the commercialization of everything, which says if you're a modern mom, you're going to bottle feed.


    "And that's still a prevalent choice that some women make."

    #2
    Breastfeeding is a huge public health issue internationally. Formula makers have done the world a disservice by marketing their wares in places where people are impoverished and conditions are unsanitary.

    Comment


      #3
      It's hard to post an opinion on this topic as a man since I can be attacked with the premise that I know nothing due to my gender, et cetera... i.e. not from a technical/knowledge sense, but rather from a social point of view. Personally, I am a proponent of breast feeding (for babies) and many studies in the past (this one included) have proven it to be better for the baby...

      Comment


        #4
        Sofia ( My daughter) was breast fed and she was NEVER sick UNTIl she started on solids...
        Never cared for formula or milk, though she loves yogurt and cheese.
        Lisa breast fed for a year, though for the last 6 months she was jsut gradullay taking her of breast milk.
        Sofia was like I said, never sick, never any stomach problems and she was born with gastro-esphagal reflux ( which we only found out AFTER she started with cereal).

        Comment


          #5
          If the government really wants Mothers, all Mothers, to breast feed their children for 6 months, they have to allow Mothers to take a parental leave of at least 6 months, with full pay. Being offered only partial pay from Unemployement Insurance just doesn't cut it.

          Comment


            #6
            Good point, while we have 12 months of Mat leave in Ontario, its paid at EI rate to a max of 365 net per week.
            Hardly motivating mothers and fathers to stay home...

            Comment


              #7
              I agree. It's unfortunate. Society realizes the benefits of giving children the very best initial start possible, but isn't ready to pay for it. Some people get "top ups" from their companies, but that's usually only feasible with really large institution-like firms with many employees (800+ range), or for government employees, who tend to get every benefit you could imagine.

              And for the record, I work at a Provincally owned University, and we get no "top ups".

              Comment


                #8
                Lisa is a programmer for the Royal bank, so she got top up for the 1st month only, I think...
                It was a hell of a pay cut for her...

                Still well worth it :)

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by j416to
                  If the government really wants Mothers, all Mothers, to breast feed their children for 6 months, they have to allow Mothers to take a parental leave of at least 6 months, with full pay. Being offered only partial pay from Unemployement Insurance just doesn't cut it.

                  It's called a breat pump. My wife did it. Pump a bunch of milk, it stores for weeks frozen, also lets us daddy's feed the baby as well.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Eve works for one of the hospitals in town, she got topped up to 65%, for 3 months. We were grateful for that, for sure. But my brother works for the Federal Government and his wife works for the Provincial Government. They both took parental leave, and got 100% pay for 12 months.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      It's so weird. Used to be poor folks breast fed, rich didn't. Now the lower classes seem to think that bottle feeding is better while the rich/educated breast feed. Our kids when they were babes slept with us so it was real easy...

                      A woman friend here got a job at the hospital as a lactation expert to encourage breast feeding. The male obgyns and pediatricians could have cared less and often have a hostile attitude - putting the babies on a bottle right away, doing circumcision with out permission and so forth. Being patriarchal Mormons probably makes the situation worse.
                      "Preparing mentally, the most important thing is, if you aren't doing it for the love of it, then don't do it." - Benny Urquidez

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by ronin69
                        Sofia ( My daughter) was breast fed and she was NEVER sick UNTIl she started on solids...
                        Boob milk has antibodies.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by j416to
                          If the government really wants Mothers, all Mothers, to breast feed their children for 6 months, they have to allow Mothers to take a parental leave of at least 6 months, with full pay. Being offered only partial pay from Unemployement Insurance just doesn't cut it.

                          It's not government's role to pay for it. It should not be required of an employer to pay for an employee who is not there. If the employer offers this as an incentive to be able to keep better and more loyal employees, great.

                          Just because a government agency recognizes something as healthier or better does not mean that the government is then obligated to pay for it.

                          As for the topic at hand, breastfeeding is not only healthier for the baby, and less expensive, I seem to remember an article stating that women who have breastfed babies are at a lower risk for breast cancer. (I'll have to look up the article, I don't remember where it was)

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by patfromlogan
                            It's so weird. Used to be poor folks breast fed, rich didn't. Now the lower classes seem to think that bottle feeding is better while the rich/educated breast feed. Our kids when they were babes slept with us so it was real easy...

                            A woman friend here got a job at the hospital as a lactation expert to encourage breast feeding. The male obgyns and pediatricians could have cared less and often have a hostile attitude - putting the babies on a bottle right away, doing circumcision with out permission and so forth. Being patriarchal Mormons probably makes the situation worse.

                            Biggest pain I had to deal with was the militant breastfeeding woman who served at the local WIC office when my second daughter was born. She was crazy, religious nut crazy. Handing out Jack Chick like tracts called "The Horror of the Bottle", pictures of kids teeth who had bottle mouth, and a 45 minute lecture on the benefits of breastfeeding once a month. She didn't understand that the people she spoke to WHERE BREASTFEEDING. Preaching to the choir and all that jazz.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              This woman wasn't a nut, she is very gentle and caring. The type that rescues strays and tries to help people. She'd tell us some heartbreaking stories though, how the institution reinforce alienation and bad practices.

                              We were on wic also, and really needed it, glad Bush is cutting those softie coddling socialist programs.
                              "Preparing mentally, the most important thing is, if you aren't doing it for the love of it, then don't do it." - Benny Urquidez

                              Comment

                              Collapse

                              Edit this module to specify a template to display.

                              Working...
                              X