Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Observatory shutdown?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    Originally posted by submessenger View Post
    I see your soft porn, and raise with actual porn:
    I was fully aware of Flesh Gordon, but am not going to post such direct references to real porn, in fear of the ban-hammner.

    You, as a mod, may of course do so with impunity, and I don't begrudge you that. Even a parody with our Dear Leader's face in it.

    Heh, I watched the original a long time ago, too.

    Comment


      #47
      Originally posted by BKR View Post
      I was fully aware of Flesh Gordon, but am not going to post such direct references to real porn, in fear of the ban-hammner.

      You, as a mod, may of course do so with impunity, and I don't begrudge you that. Even a parody with our Dear Leader's face in it.

      Heh, I watched the original a long time ago, too.
      Said photo is from Amazon offering video for sale, so I figure it's safe enough - no nudes, no text which exceeds a PG rating...

      (edit) yeah, the original is the only one I watched; I thought this was a better photo, though.
      Consider for a moment that there is no meme about brown-haired, brown-eyed step children.

      Comment


        #48
        Originally posted by submessenger View Post
        Said photo is from Amazon offering video for sale, so I figure it's safe enough - no nudes, no text which exceeds a PG rating...

        (edit) yeah, the original is the only one I watched; I thought this was a better photo, though.
        Good job, Mr. Moderator.

        Now, get the new version of bs.net up and running, please.

        Comment


          #49
          Originally posted by submessenger View Post
          I see your soft porn, and raise with actual porn:
          I'm not sure it's considered "porn" by modern standards.

          At the time, the original release of FG1 was an R-rated cut of an X rated movie. The sequel, FG2, was NC-17, which still isn't technically pornography.

          That's why FG1 was given a final R rating, they cut out the porno parts.

          FG2 was was the worst NC-17 movie I've ever seen.

          Comment


            #50
            Originally posted by W. Rabbit View Post
            I'm not sure it's considered "porn" by modern standards.

            At the time, the original release of FG1 was an R-rated cut of an X rated movie. The sequel, FG2, was NC-17, which still isn't technically pornography.

            That's why FG1 was given a final R rating, they cut out the porno parts.

            FG2 was was the worst NC-17 movie I've ever seen.
            I only watched it for the interesting story, anyways. Everything else was a bone-us.
            Consider for a moment that there is no meme about brown-haired, brown-eyed step children.

            Comment

            Collapse

            Edit this module to specify a template to display.

            Working...
            X