PDA

View Full Version : _ing _un self destructs in a thread on Kung Fu mag forums.



Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6

M1K3
1/21/2011 9:53am,
Don't know if any one is interested but this is a great thread. It has turned into a major pissing contest that even the moderators can't control any more.

They have done more to damage what little reputation the _un has better than any thread I've read here.

So, feel free to join in the fun it you want. It will probably get me banned over there but MEH, who cares.

The basic premise is how not to fight a boxer and was started by a poster who trains MMA.

how not to fight a boxer - Kung Fu Magazine Forums (http://www.kungfumagazine.com/forum/showthread.php?t=59487)

MrGalt
1/21/2011 10:28am,
Jesus. 17 pages. I'll get back to you in three days when I've read the whole thing. I never get tired of the chun in its natural environment, the deadly forums of the Internet.

MMAMickey
1/21/2011 10:28am,
I got to page five.

IsThisRight?
1/21/2011 10:46am,
lol at this:
YouTube - wingtsun vs a real boxer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHrLMbBM_sc)

If you dont read the thread at least watch that.

chingythingy
1/21/2011 10:52am,
lol at this:
YouTube - wingtsun vs a real boxer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHrLMbBM_sc)

If you dont read the thread at least watch that.

Even in comedy _ing _un is pwned by the boxer.

helmutlvx
1/21/2011 11:03am,
>Watch on Youtube, not embedded
>Press 3 repeatedly
>Fucking LULZ

Rexley
1/21/2011 11:23am,
It seems that every chun thread must contain at least four elements:

1) lots of theory

2) walls of text

3) chunners using chinaboxer's training vids to show the awesomeness of the chun

4) non-chunners using those same vids to point out the retardation of the chun

perhaps diagrams of triangles and such should be a part of this list but I didn't see any in the thread. That being said, I didn't read the whole thing, either.

It is Fake
1/21/2011 11:30am,
lol at this:
YouTube - wingtsun vs a real boxer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHrLMbBM_sc)

If you dont read the thread at least watch that......and fighterman is back.

Hahahaha wow I guess bullshido is slowly growing up. The OP video is the subject of two small threads. No one here really cared.

Kovacs
1/21/2011 12:03pm,
1) lots of theory

2) walls of text

3) chunners using chinaboxer's training vids to show the awesomeness of the chun

4) non-chunners using those same vids to point out the retardation of the chun



You forgot:

5) Excuses. Lots of them.

Rzero
1/21/2011 12:30pm,
6) Bruce Lee.

CrackFox
1/21/2011 12:31pm,
lol at this:
YouTube - wingtsun vs a real boxer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHrLMbBM_sc)

If you dont read the thread at least watch that.
Not what I was expecting. It rocked.

ermghoti
1/21/2011 12:48pm,
Consciousness: 2 d34d133 4 the ring.

Larus marinus
1/21/2011 2:53pm,
Haven't read the thread yet.

Have they decided whether Wing Chun is better than Wing Tsun and Ving Tsun yet?

It is Fake
1/21/2011 2:58pm,
It is a _ng _un thread I will assume yes. I always read them backwards because, there is always a summary.

To answer your question yes.

You guys are so ****ing held up on how your :lineage" does this that and the other thing that you guys can' even understand that you have more to gain by working together than you have to lose.
Who gives a flying **** if its TWC, HFY, MYWC, scratch my balls and call me grandpa WC !
Seriously !
You guys are like a bunch of whiney women on the rag, my apologies to all the whiney women on the rag.

M1K3
1/21/2011 3:08pm,
Even for a _ing _un based forum this one has turned into a train wreck.

Kovacs
1/21/2011 3:21pm,
Christ that's painful. It's like trying to persuade someone that Scientology is a bad idea.