Ad Hominem: Attacking the Researcher Just as Effective as Discrediting the Research

Do facts upset you? Do you not like the results of Scientific research? Boy do we have great news for you!

That’s right, instead of analyzing studies for flawed methods or bad data, you can just call the researcher a dick!

A study conducted by Ralph Barnes , Heather Johnston , Noah MacKenzie , Stephanie Tobin , and Chelsea Taglang—presumably not dicks—sought to discover if “ad hominem” attacks on researchers have any effect on whether or not the actual research is considered valid by the public.

Two separate experiments were conducted involving a group of 439 college students and a group of 199 adults, both reading various research claims.  Each claim was accompanied by either a direct attack upon the empirical basis of the science, or a personal attack on the scientist who made the claim, and sometimes both. The individual participants were then invited to express attitudes about the claims.

“ hominem attacks may have the same degree of impact as attacks on the empirical basis of the science claims…”


This is an Ad Homineme

From the study, via PLOS One:

Results indicate that ad hominem attacks may have the same degree of impact as attacks on the empirical basis of the science claims, and that allegations of conflict of interest may be just as influential as allegations of outright fraud.

Ouch. Keep in mind though that this mostly applies to non-scientists trying to interpret (or misinterpret) the results of research, based simply on the impression that there was a conflict of interest.

The results of the current study indicate that laypersons significantly reduce their confidence in a claim due to knowledge of a conflict of interest. This has practical implications, as 91% of anti-vaccine websites explicitly claim that the bio-medical field is rife with conflicts of interests and this communication tactic may play a part in the success of the anti-vaccine movement.

The important takeaway is that when dealing with a science denier’s nonsense, this is yet another thing to keep an eye out for. Expecto Stupidum.

Sources and More Info

The Study on PLOS One

Ad Hominem – Wikipedia (if you’re a stupid dummy head)

View Comments

  • Vaccines have caused immense damage, and the ad hominem of smearing any/all anti-vaccers emphasizes the brainwashed's inability to read facts about the real damages they do.

Published by

Recent Posts

People who think this way are more prone to believe Conspiracy Theories

...and as the saying goes, sometimes the reason is because you're stupid and make bad decisions. A recent study out…

1 month ago

Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: How the Internet Ruined Politics

The year was 1993. All jeans were "mom jeans", and Saved By The Bell was still poisoning the minds of the…

1 month ago

No Reasonable Person Would Believe What Alex Jones Says, say Alex Jones’ Attorneys

Leonard Pozner is the father of a six year old named Noah. Noah was murdered in his classroom in 2012.…

2 months ago

How to Argue Like a Badass, Not a Dumbass

Everyone hates those "One Simple Trick...!" articles. But some things really are simple. If you want to lose weight, you…

2 months ago

This Article Proves I’m Right and You’re Wrong

After extensive research backed by longitudinal meta-analysis and careful cross-sectional population sampling, a team of academics and scientists have recently…

4 months ago

Bare-knuckle Boxing Returns to the United States

After 130 years, the state of Wyoming has decided to let boxers "knuckle up", under the old school, but arguably…

4 months ago