| |||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No BS MMA and Martial ArtsArticles and ReviewsOnline CommunityDiscussion ForumsBullshido Site ResourcesTools and Info |
| |||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No BS MMA and Martial ArtsArticles and ReviewsOnline CommunityDiscussion ForumsBullshido Site ResourcesTools and Info |
Originally Posted by Peppo
If this clip made you a fan of Elisabette her homepage is http://www.elisabette.se headlined with "E.. knows all you need to know about yourself, love and life"
Peter "Petpower" Semjonow is quoted at VOF, saying that the test was made in Australia the BJJ-attacker didn't want to hit the YB-defender. However, consensual fighting with punches and kicks forbidden there, so they had to settle for grappling. Moving the goalpost like a true creep...
YouTube - Yellow Bamboo vs reality
YouTube - Yellow Bamboo vs reality
Ergo: Since the YB-test isn't compatible with
falsifiability
, skeptics shouldn't even think of trying to beat the test. The YBs can always fall back on "didn't run fast/punch hard/raged hard enough".
Had to look into it today and, If I am putting 2 and 2 together correctly, this video was made in Stockholm in january 2005. The instructor is Peter Semjonow (Petpower), the practitioner is a woman called Elisabette and the attacker is an invited martial artist (who wasn't hostile enough...). As you can see http://www.vof.se/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=139 the video has been here before.
If this clip made you a fan of Elisabette her homepage is http://www.elisabette.se headlined with "E.. knows all you need to know about yourself, love and life"
Oh wow! This thread brings me back to 2004/05 when
petpower was pestering Kampsport.se
petpower was pestering Kampsport.se
.
Originally Posted by Asriel
No, it's part of moving the goalpost fallacy. The attacker is supposed to charge from some 20 meters away AND scream AND hit the defender with the right fist AND be angry.
Now if even ONE of these requirements clearly isn't satisfied (didn't scream) or the YBs claims that it wasn't satisfied enough (how do you prove anger?), then the results can be declared null and void, even if the defender got killed.
petpower
petpower
:
Zaphod:
Zaphod:
petpower
petpower
:And there did my BS detector go break. It's like any cheap fantasy tale about some kid growing up to be a magician and is warned to not abuse the power. Not because it's wrong, but because the power itself can tell.
Gaaarrrhhgghhh! I can't think of a better case for using amoralism and nihilism as mental tools.
Wow, people actually believe stuff like that works. The more you know.
yeah...Bink! and down they go. What was that supposed to prove? Yellow shirts look funnier falling over?
@peppo:
The dialect is definitely Stockholmian.
And yes, this makes me feel ashamed for being swedish.
Originally Posted by ggboxer
http://maximumselfdefense.blogspot.c...-why-ving.html
and
YouTube - Ving Tsung Ernie Barrios
Keep Dreamin'.
Honestly, you think you'd stand a chance? It's Bjj's greatest challenge --- and yours.
This is how the site bullshido degrades itself, you think because of your sport grappling that you have all the answers, but you don't know every means of fighting. Take a look at this:
http://maximumselfdefense.blogspot.c...-why-ving.html
and
YouTube - Ving Tsung Ernie Barrios
YouTube - Ving Tsung Ernie Barrios
Just lay off the system bashing. This is a true Ving Tsun fighter speaking, and I know combat.