Ricky 'The Hitman' Hatton Gets Knocked Out In Bar Fight, Drug Troubles

**CLEANSHIGH** · Posted On: 9/19/2010 8:42pm

Of course you would never get through to me because I actually know what I'm talking about and do not respond to babble

**Holy Moment** · Posted On: 9/19/2010 9:13pm

Originally Posted by CLEANSHIGH

I'm a scrawny bitch who'd rather play karate with toddlers than put in the effort to get big.

You can't hide the truth. It's obvious that you're afraid of the Bearish Man. Does this video make you cringe in fear?

YouTube - paul varelans vs mark hall

**It is Fake** · Posted On: 9/19/2010 9:55pm

Originally Posted by CLEANSHIGH

I actually know what I'm talking about and do not respond to babble

Oh Good lord this is going to come back to haunt you.

**Holy Moment** · Posted On: 9/19/2010 10:03pm

**kayman101** · Posted On: 9/19/2010 10:11pm

Excuse me, Mr. Survival of the Fittest, but wasn't the purpose of the UFC to show that a smaller, weaker fighter could use technique to defeat a larger, stronger opponent?? This "lift weights and dominate" philosophy must be a troll job because we have been exposed to ample empirical proof that technique will prevail over muscle 9 times out of 10. In fact, they created weight classes after competitors developed FIGHTING SKILL that created a competitive environment for a smaller grappler such as Royce. Some drunk boxer getting knocked out in a bar should not discredit the mountain of evidence where technique prevails over the meatheads.

**Holy Moment** · Posted On: 9/19/2010 10:14pm

They created weight classes because the small guys couldn't handle the big guys. Tank Abbott said it best:

"The little guys sucks."

Edit: The only reason a big man ever loses a fight is if he tries to use that martial arts bullocks instead of fighting naturally. Man's natural fighting style works best, as it relies on tangible attributes such as size and power instead of hokey, unnatural movements. Just take a gander:

YouTube - Jesse Eluapu vs Johnny Padlee - Future Brawl 3 [1996.02.27]

**battusai** · Posted On: 9/19/2010 10:19pm

How big are you, Holy Moment?

**kayman101** · Posted On: 9/19/2010 10:23pm

Originally Posted by Holy Moment

They created weight classes because the small guys couldn't handle the big guys. Tank Abbott said it best:

"The little guys sucks."

Who won the first 3 UFC's? Was Royce the biggest guy in the tournament? Has Tank ever won a UFC tournament? Drive home safely, I'll be here all week.

**danno** · Posted On: 9/19/2010 10:32pm

Originally Posted by kayman101

Excuse me, Mr. Survival of the Fittest, but wasn't the purpose of the UFC to show that a smaller, weaker fighter could use technique to defeat a larger, stronger opponent?? This "lift weights and dominate" philosophy must be a troll job because we have been exposed to ample empirical proof that technique will prevail over muscle 9 times out of 10. In fact, they created weight classes after competitors developed FIGHTING SKILL that created a competitive environment for a smaller grappler such as Royce. Some drunk boxer getting knocked out in a bar should not discredit the mountain of evidence where technique prevails over the meatheads.

yeah, he's trolling.

still, size matters.

i don't get why people are so eager to reduce things down to a single element like size, skill, element of surprise, etc. they're all very important factors, and each can trump the other depending on circumstances.

what we do in sport is remove things which are irrelevant to fighting skill. the point is to find out who better at actually fighting. both fighters are given time to prepare, there are weight divisions to (mostly) remove the advantage of size, they must fight wearing the same clothes, both fighters are alerted as to when the fight begins, and so on.

really, you can go out and rack up quite a few street fight "victories" without having much fighting skill at all. that's why i have little respect for people who claim they're good street fighters - they're mostly just opportunists.