-
Featherweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Plantation,Fl
- Posts
- 54
- Points
- 231
Posted On:
9/03/2010 7:56am -
Featherweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Plantation,Fl
- Posts
- 54
- Points
- 231
Posted On:
9/03/2010 7:59am -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 85
- Points
- 186

Posted On:
9/03/2010 2:20pm
Style: Karate--
In the early 1980's, I found a hopkido book that was published in Korea. The authors and instructors were all Korean military. I have never found another hopkido manual like it. Since then, all the hopkido manuals I have seen look like sports martial arts and civilian self-defense books, not like true military combatives manuals.
All of this for context: That manual was written during the 1970's when the North Koreans were sending commando teams into areas south of the DMZ and behaving in an aggressive manner. During that period several American servicemen were killed in ambushes. This kind of aggressive behavior continued into the 1980's when North Korean agents even tried to assassinate the president of South Korea in Rangoon, Burma, in 1983.
Hopkido can be really ruthless, but I suspect like most popularized "martial arts", the military skills emphasis diminishes with time and the practice changes to sports and basic civilian self-defense techniques. Context tends to shape practice. -
Featherweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Plantation,Fl
- Posts
- 54
- Points
- 231
Posted On:
9/03/2010 2:59pm
Style: BJJ AND HAPKIDO--
Very true bro the school I go to is very traditional we attack fast during randori, I can't tell you how many times I have been tagged in the face when I first started. There really isn't a sports aspect to it that I have seen. You are right Hapkido can be very ruthless I don't leave a class without having something hurt, that means its real training and the technique works.
-
12th level logic wielder
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Vancouver, BC
- Posts
- 1,956
- Points
- 3,572


Posted On:
9/03/2010 3:31pm
Style: BJJ, judo, rapier--
No it doesn’t. That’s a stupid thing that people tell themselves in order to use bruises to prop up their flagging self esteem. (I know—I’ve been there.)
Good training includes sparring. In sparring, you’ll sometimes get hurt. Ergo, good training does involve pain and some risk of injury. However, to say that pain or injury implies good training is a converse error (a.k.a. affirming the consequent). Lots of shitty training also results in bruises or even injury as people go unnecessarily hard during co-operative drills. Someone around here made the observation that the more instructors hurt their uke during demos and compliant drills, the shittier the martial art tends to be. I concur.
And, of course, you can take hard hits in a shitty martial art not because the attacks taught are good, but because the defence they teach you is bad. Again, I speak from personal experience.
P implies Q; Q; therefore…we have no idea about P on that basis alone.[ petterhaggholm.net | blog | essays ]
[ self defence: general thoughts | bjj: “don’t go to the ground”? ]
“The plural of anecdote is anecdotes, not data.” -
Featherweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Plantation,Fl
- Posts
- 54
- Points
- 231
Posted On:
9/03/2010 3:43pm -
12th level logic wielder
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Vancouver, BC
- Posts
- 1,956
- Points
- 3,572


Posted On:
9/03/2010 4:08pm
Style: BJJ, judo, rapier--
Really? This sounds like a poor training environment to me—others may have different perspectives. In 2½ years of BJJ (which involves an awful lot of joint manipulation), I have received only one real injury, and it was fairly minor: An armbar cranked too hard and too quickly for me to tap out in time. (As a result, my right arm does not extend to quite the degree my left arm does: Perhaps it never again will.) But that’s one injury in 2½ years, and of course it was done by a raw beginner, a new whitebelt.
People with any degree of skill and experience tend to know (1) how hard and fast it is safe to apply a joint manipulation and (2) to do it slowly enough to give their training partners time to tap out. After all, sparring is training not real fighting; it should be done with aliveness and intensity, but it’s stupid to go balls-to-the-wall and injure each other all the time.[ petterhaggholm.net | blog | essays ]
[ self defence: general thoughts | bjj: “don’t go to the ground”? ]
“The plural of anecdote is anecdotes, not data.” -
pro nonsense self defense
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- San Diego
- Posts
- 11,036
- Points
- 13,282

Awards:
Posted On:
9/03/2010 4:21pm
Style: FMA, dumbek, Indian clubs--
I used to run a chin na class, and one of the first things I would teach was how, when and why to tap (early and often). Second, that joint manipulation should establish control before you apply pain/damage. This is important so that you can do a technique with speed and resistance without injuring your training partner, and it allows you precision since now you can apply force from a good position in a slow, controlled manner even if a technique started fast (there may be pain en route, but not the kind that really damages joints). This seems obvious, but a lot of people like to just grab something and start rapidly applying force, and if you do it this way, you'll end up with the kind of injuries duralmaru described. I would be very unhappy if I trained at a place and was getting lots of injuries from joint manipulation, especially in scripted joint manipulation like hapkido. I agree with your analysis.
-
Valiant Monk of Booze & War
Achievements:- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Baltimore, MD
- Posts
- 18,246
- Points
- 29,717




Posted On:
9/03/2010 5:59pm



Reply With Quote















Registered Member
Posted On:
9/03/2010 6:38am
Style: BJJ