Qi,Chi,Ki, or whatever else it may be called

**It is Fake** · Posted On: 10/10/2012 7:43pm

Originally Posted by csharp.negative

Suffice to say I like qigong and neigong. Whether YOU believe that it will actually make bones harder and more dense, or that it will make your organs sustain less injury, or any of that is up to you. I for one credit it to my fighting ability 100%. I will attempt to convince no one.

This is the part I am talking about, the rest of your post was fine.

**Resonance10** · Posted On: 10/11/2012 7:38am

Originally Posted by It is Fake

This is the part I am talking about, the rest of your post was fine.

This was why I posted, and also why I quoted you as WR had quoted part of your post in response to me. If WR had posted what he addressed to me as a response to CSNeg as well I wouldn't have cared as imo it applied to us both.

Honestly not sure what you mean here:

Do you read out of order on purpose? You hadn't even posted when I made that comment.

I have no issues with Qigong/Neigong, I practice it and I teach it.

So by 'no debate' you don't mean 'don't express opinion'?

No, why would you even try to make this assertion?

I was stoopid. Trying to tease out the difference between cnegs 'opinion' and WR critique of my response...i think..

**Vieux Normand** · Posted On: 10/11/2012 12:48pm

Originally Posted by Mr. Machette

Technically you could mix up some untestested soft touch styles and call it "MMA" but how far would it get you in a world of people that actualy hit and submit?

Here's the problem: most people "in the world" never actually hit and submit. Guess the percentage of people out there who actually train, hit and submit. Pro and serious ammy fighters. Anyone who has a job requiring those skills. Basically, that's it--a tiny percentage, to understate matters. For the rest of the population of "the world", one could pass chunbooj off as "MMA"...and (for a while at least--one might actually make a living at it. Oh, wait...charlatanry never happens.

**It is Fake** · Posted On: 10/11/2012 12:51pm

Originally Posted by Resonance10

This was why I posted, and also why I quoted you as WR had quoted part of your post in response to me.

Then you respond to him. He was explaining what he thought I meant, so you address him not me.

If WR had posted what he addressed to me as a response to CSNeg as well I wouldn't have cared as imo it applied to us both.

Yes, this is why CS responded negatively to you. You have a weird reading issue.

Honestly not sure what you mean here:

You addressed my quote as if I responded to your post. You hadn't even responded then quoted and addressed me as if you were part of the initial conversation.. See above for what should have occurred.

I was stoopid. Trying to tease out the difference between cnegs 'opinion' and WR critique of my response...i think..

Yes, you have reading comprehension issues and writing problems as well. Oh and you still didn't address why you think "there is no debate" means "you can't express an opinion."

**Resonance10** · Posted On: 10/11/2012 1:37pm

Originally Posted by It is Fake

Then you respond to him. He was explaining what he thought I meant, so you address him not me.

Yes, this is why CS responded negatively to you. You have a weird reading issue.

You addressed my quote as if I responded to your post. You hadn't even responded then quoted and addressed me as if you were part of the initial conversation.. See above for what should have occurred.

Yes, you have reading comprehension issues and writing problems as well. Oh and you still didn't address why you think "there is no debate" means "you can't express an opinion."

Ah, this explains a lot. Thanks. I thought I had responded to WR..must of posted as a reply to you buy mistake?

I have not noticed a negative response from CS or at least haven't taken it negatively. So yes maybe it is reading comprehension.

"there is no debate" means "you can't express an opinion."

what I said:

So by 'no debate' you don't mean 'don't express opinion'?

this was because someone had posted opinion which to me invited debate, but WR called me on it, whilst asserted opinion was unchallenged.
It was a question.

For posting like an ass I apologize.

**csharp.negative** · Posted On: 10/11/2012 8:00pm

So do I get some kind of award for having a post go from trollshido then back to the original forum?

Definitely the weirdest private message I've ever gotten...

Also, since Resonance10 mentioned it, I really didn't mean anything negative/baiting by my post. Sure I came off strong, but all I can say is that I have a strong opinion on qigong and neigong. Sorry if it came off like that.

**It is Fake** · Posted On: 10/11/2012 8:16pm

Originally Posted by csharp.negative

Also, since Resonance10 mentioned it, I really didn't mean anything negative/baiting by my post. Sure I came off strong, but all I can say is that I have a strong opinion on qigong and neigong. Sorry if it came off like that.

Simply put, your posts are negative because of your strong wording.