Posted On:6/28/2010 10:12am
Guy Who Pays the Bills and Gets the Death Threats Style: MMA (Retired)
Posted On:6/28/2010 10:42am
For those that don't want to read a 200+ page legal document: the Supreme Court of the United States of America struck down a Chicago law banning handguns. <sarcasm>I'm sure we'll see a huge spike in crime because guns are now so much more available to criminals</sarcasm>
His heart was visible, and the dismal sack that maketh excrement of what is eaten.
Posted On:6/28/2010 10:47am
Take that, hippies.
Fear and bullets.
Posted On:6/28/2010 11:09am
Very encouraging on many levels.
And lo, Kano looked down upon the field and saw the multitudes. Amongst them were the disciples of Uesheba who were greatly vexed at his sayings. And Kano spake: "Do not be concerned with the mote in thy neighbor's eye, when verily thou hast a massive stick in thine ass".
--Scrolls of Bujutsu: Chapter 5 vs 10-14.
Posted On:6/28/2010 11:10am
oh and "Seaerch function, noob!
High Court Rules in Favor of Gun Rights - No BS MMA and Martial Arts
Merry Christmas! shitter's full...
Posted On:6/28/2010 11:24am
awesome, i can't wait to get my very own handgun and go crimin' now that it's legal!
but for real, that kicks ass. i think i'll give the NRA a $1.05
YouTube- Team America - Freedom isn't free
Originally Posted by it is fake
yeah, normally i'd get a quote, but couldn't be bothered.
BJJ wins again!
Posted On:7/03/2010 5:18am
They actually did a LOT more than strike down the Chicago ordinance. What they actually held was that "the right upheld in Heller is incorporated." Go back to Heller v. D.C., and "the right" is not a right to have at least one handgun in the home, though Chicago's Mayor, aldermen and corporation counsel are trying to spin it that way for now.
What Heller said in its first holding was that:
"The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."
I stole this from an insider in Illinois . . . notice the highlights he made. There's nothing there limiting McDonald to a decision on whether you can have one handgun in the home--as much as the other side likes to say that Heller left the door open for restrictions, the bottom line is that "lawful purposes" covers a wide range of uses and "such as" means that the bit about possession in the home is only one example.
Posted On:7/03/2010 5:27am
Style: mma /boxing/muai thai
Can they get all anal with that and get you if you shoot somebody in your backyard?
Of course we cannot even own slingtshots here. We can own burly throwers though.
Posted On:7/12/2010 4:51pm
Posted On:7/12/2010 4:53pm
Style: Arnis/Kenpo hybrid
Articles and Reviews
Tools and Info