Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ
- Posts
- 1,019
- Points
- 1,617


Posted On:
6/13/2010 9:40pm -
and humble, too!
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 2,272
- Points
- 12,460

Posted On:
6/14/2010 11:51pm
Style: Systema, BJJ, Arrestling--
Based off what those articles say, they look like they could be the worst of both worlds. Allow me to explain:
On soft targets, the author boasts that they do not fragment, instead creating a "temporary wound channel." This is the same thing which happens when you fart and your butt-cheeks flap together. A "temporary wound channel" is just the elasticity of the tissue responding to the temporary presence of the missile. Once the energy dissipates, the tissue returns to it's original position, albeit with some minor tears.
Allegedly, the bullets will enhance the tears. In reality, their lighter weight will not allow them to maintain sufficient kinetic energy as they travel through the tissue for this effect to occur reliably.
These rounds may cause more temporary cavitation, but without hydrostatic shock, this means very little. If the rounds don't fragment, they cause less hemorraging - which is much more important in terms of incapacitating someone than "temporary wound channels."
Fun fact. It's of French design. They have sunk billions of their proud national coffers into designing a bullet that won't hurt someone.Sometimes, we put Ricin in the Cocaine. :ninja7:
Originally Posted by Cullion



Reply With Quote










...is THE PENETRATOR
Posted On:
6/13/2010 9:51am
Style: German longsword, .45 ACP
Are there any disadvantages to reverse ogive rounds?