-
Light Heavyweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,603
- Points
- 7,706

Posted On:
4/18/2010 1:46am--
I referred to the entire compass of "detailed treatises", from the 19th century back to the 13th; that includes everything from let's say, Allanson-Winn's "Broadsword and Singlestick" back to the I:33 manuscript (circa 1300 and obviously representing a then-extant tradition of sword and buckler play). Yes, there's a very great deal of detail in there; some 500 years' worth. What are you trying to take issue with?
Check out the Bullshido.net Western Martial Arts Forum for all things Western, martial and arty.
Bartitsu: the Gentlemanly Art of Self Defence (est. 1899) -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Europe
- Posts
- 257
- Points
- 1,976

Posted On:
4/18/2010 2:27am
Style: sambo, stuff--
There may be the one or other exception (like there is the one or other good CMA school), but the majority of HEMA/ARMA is larping away at the medieval manuals. They tend to pick out one or two and claim to be able to reconstruct a martial art based on that.
I take issue with someone claiming to be able to learn (or reconstruct) sword and buckler fighting from this:

A typical page of manuscript I.33
I know you do not see a problem with that. But then you study the fighting style of Sherlock Holmes... -
Light Heavyweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,603
- Points
- 7,706

Posted On:
4/18/2010 3:05am--
Is your argument specific to I:33? That's the earliest extant, and one of the least technically detailed treatises; even so, I've seen many people executing effective reconstructions of that style, tested in free-fencing/sparring.
YouTube- hammaborg I.33, halpschilt vs. custodia prima 1.3
YouTube- P1030806.MOV
That no reconstruction will ever be 100% accurate and that no two interpretations will ever be identical is taken for granted in this field; the object is to produce a viable, modern martial art based as closely as possible on the historical sources. The only real question is "what constitutes an acceptable degree of accuracy", and most of us have agreed that this can only be answered by individuals, for themselves.
As for many of the later treatises, many of them present exquisitely detailed systems complete with full illustrations, strategies and techniques fully described in the text, etc. - but surely you already know this (?) Even if not, it hardly requires a Holmesian level of detective work to achieve satisfactory results in HEMA; just lots of research and hard, honest training in line with the agreed-upon objectives.Check out the Bullshido.net Western Martial Arts Forum for all things Western, martial and arty.
Bartitsu: the Gentlemanly Art of Self Defence (est. 1899) -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 302
- Points
- 2,137


Posted On:
4/18/2010 3:45am
Style: Parkour, BJJ and Judo.--
^^^
This. Reconstruction of ancient MA is not 100% accurate, but doing the best they can, then pressure testing it to see how viable the techniques are will produce a system that is just as effective, if not more so, given the advances in training methodology we have now.
The same thing happened with Pankration, which has become MMA in a hilarious outfit. But is a very respectable and effective MA, so I don't see how reconstructing fencing could be a negative.
At the very least you'll have a cool, realistic swordfighting style that may have some European roots in the event you are challenged to a fight by a kendoka near a bunch of very long sticks. -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Europe
- Posts
- 257
- Points
- 1,976

Posted On:
4/18/2010 8:46am
Style: sambo, stuff--
Now that is one huge mouth full. Especially given the fact that (unlike people in ye olden days) you dont have the slightest bit of actual combat experience with the weapons in question.
It is also why I start to think that Bullshido's community should start to rethink its stance on HEMA/ARMA stuff. If arguments like the above one are used to advertise seminars and payed tuition, thats misleading customers. -
BJJ might make you a better ground fighter, but Judo will make you a better dancer.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- W. Yorks, UK
- Posts
- 5,041
- Points
- 16,058

Posted On:
4/18/2010 9:00am -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Ontario
- Posts
- 606
- Points
- 773



Posted On:
4/18/2010 11:38am
Style: mma--
Yes but we still want to play with swords because its cool. We can do some pressure testing with protective equipment.
Wait, our community has a stance on this stuff? It seemed to me that we had divergent opinions, and if there was a stance it would be found in the armory under a sticky, not in YMAS thread.
It sounds to me like being honest about the product delivered. Being open about the fact that its a reconstructed MA and how. The only people who are going to get into this are people looking for historical reconstruction and larping. -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Posts
- 59
- Points
- 173

Posted On:
4/18/2010 4:08pm -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Idaho
- Posts
- 596
- Points
- 3,543

Posted On:
4/18/2010 4:38pm
Style: Boxing--
in regards to HEMA being realistic.
Itsdamn near impossible to actually test the effectiveness of these MA's without shedding some blood. Here is an ACTUAL duel between two frenchmen in 1958
YouTube- 1958 Epee Duel Lifar vs Cuevas
Testing for realz is difficult because, as you can see these men are scared of getting stabbed.
I would be to.



Reply With Quote













Registered Member
Posted On:
4/18/2010 1:26am
Style: sambo, stuff