-
The man they call FoM
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Posts
- 3,593
Posted On:
2/16/2004 5:52pm -
WEIGHTING
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Posts
- 5,538
Posted On:
2/16/2004 5:52pm -
The man they call FoM
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Posts
- 3,593
Posted On:
2/16/2004 5:55pm--
eh, maybe this is cheating a bit, but I should mention that I consider things like solo grappling drills, bodyweight exercises.
Its WAY easier to create and modify bodyweight exercises to be sports specific.Last edited by FingerorMoon?; 2/16/2004 5:57pm at .
The Wastrel - So attractive he HAS to be a woman.
- Pizdoff -
Neutral, or nearly so
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Posts
- 8,050
Posted On:
2/16/2004 6:06pm--
Agreed. However you get "more bang for your buck" with weights versus bodyweight excercises. I'm lazy and so look for efficency.Originally posted by FingerorMoon?
Its WAY easier to create and modify bodyweight exercises to be sports specific.
Basically the only way to get stronger at 'x' is to do 'x'. Otherwise you are working to develop 'y' on the assumption that it transfers at some rate ('r') to 'x'.
Basically the goal is to go with the excercise with a greater 'r' (approaching 1). While some weightlifting excercises have a lower 'r' the greater strength gains you get from them frequently overcomes the deficit to provide a greater net increase in strength(x).
And that is the most complicated way I can discuss this. -
The man they call FoM
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Posts
- 3,593
Posted On:
2/16/2004 6:34pm--
I was just thinking the same thing :)And that is the most complicated way I can discuss this.
Don't agree. You get far better limit strength obviously.you get "more bang for your buck" with weights versus bodyweight excercises. I'm lazy and so look for efficency.
And if you are training for size, then there is of course no comparison.
Bodyweight exercising can allow you to better train balance/alignment, flexibility, endurance.
To me that equates to better bang for your buck.
Plus, we can get into plyometric and explosive training, which again I believe is far easier, cheaper, safer, and faster to do with bodyweight exercises.The Wastrel - So attractive he HAS to be a woman.
- Pizdoff -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Miami
- Posts
- 286
Posted On:
2/17/2004 8:07am
Style: Aikido, Boxing, MT--
The reason I am interested in starting bw exercises is mostly because of the balance and 'body sense' aspect. I guess knowing how your muscles move and work in cooperation with each other is helpful in martial arts. However I think explosive power is helpful as well, which I suppose can be gotten easily by weights. Then of course there are Bodyweight plyometrics which builds explosive strength as well.
As for as limit strength goes, I think you can get pretty far with b/w exercises. I'm not a total creampuff (5'10 175 lbs about 8% bf) and can max my bench at around 215 or 220 (not a lot I know) but I can not do a single planche (in proper form) . Reading some articles on these exercises, I realized that gymnasts do only b/w exercises and have very respectible lifts. I don't know, I'm in a pickle ;) Can't decide which is better for me. -
The man they call FoM
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Posts
- 3,593
Posted On:
2/18/2004 6:37pm



Reply With Quote











Administrator
Posted On:
2/16/2004 5:48pm
Style: Muay Thai & BJJ