John Anderson's grappling systems

**Kintanon** · Posted On: 1/12/2010 2:19pm

Oh yes, this is also a bogus review for a bogus poster. The guy is useless and this review is 99% likely to be completely fabricated.

**Angry Mandrill** · Posted On: 1/13/2010 9:43am

Originally Posted by Kintanon

There is no mistake in the title. It's a demonstration of how improper punctuation changes the meaning of a sentence. The fact that you believe there is a hyphenation error means that you need to read this book even more than most.

er, wrongo. 'zero-tolerance' needs a hyphen. you're putting adjective + noun together to make a modifier of 'approach.'

**PointyShinyBurn** · Posted On: 1/13/2010 9:55am

Originally Posted by nohero

er, wrongo. 'zero-tolerance' needs a hyphen. you're putting adjective + noun together to make a modifier of 'approach.'

You only really need a hyphen when the interpretation would be otherwise ambiguous. Since 'zero' can't modify 'approach' it's not compulsory here; style manuals can easily be Googled that argue both ways.

**Angry Mandrill** · Posted On: 1/13/2010 10:38am

Originally Posted by PointyShinyBurn

You only really need a hyphen when the interpretation would be otherwise ambiguous. Since 'zero' can't modify 'approach' it's not compulsory here; style manuals can easily be Googled that argue both ways.

i'm a chicago man myself, and i hate 'zero tolerance' as a modifier without a hyphen.

but anyway, screw this grammar crap, let's get back to the issue at hand: what sandbag's instructor is gonna do when he reads this shite review. how hard could it be to figure out which of his students is sandbag?

**Psycho Dad** · Posted On: 1/13/2010 11:31am

Once again, I'd like to reiterate the fact that this is most likely a joke post/review.

**Aaron_** · Posted On: 1/14/2010 2:44pm

I google'd "shu gun do" and the only link that actually referred to "shu gun do" was to this thread. Therefore, I am inclined to believe that the review was entirely fabricated.

obvious troll is obvious.

**fidgit** · Posted On: 1/15/2010 6:50am

Does that meant when I tell people to "suck a fat baby's dick" that I need to hyphenate fat-baby? Otherwise fat might describe the dick?

**Don Gwinn** · Posted On: 1/15/2010 12:35pm

Aaron: I'see what you did there. Well played.

**Angry Mandrill** · Posted On: 1/15/2010 1:28pm

Originally Posted by fidgit

Does that meant when I tell people to "suck a fat baby's dick" that I need to hyphenate fat-baby? Otherwise fat might describe the dick?

not in the slightest. any idiot can figure that out.

but when i tell people to lick an aids-ravaged crack whore's cum-filled asshole, well, you get the idea. the hyphens keep things together.

**Travis17** · Posted On: 1/19/2010 4:51pm

Pretty funny review.

You're an idiot if you have to ask if it's real.

I kind of figured after seeing that thread Phrost posted about sponsors getting to ban someone that Sandbag2 would get the vote after all the useless **** he posted.

But the way you all reply seriously to his trolls and have to ask if he's serious probably gives him endless joy. Just thought I'd point that out for you since quite a few of you don't get it.

Also curious why the mods just don't ban his ass and get rid of him.