Posted On:2/11/2004 9:59am
Style: Im a Lover, not a fighter
Originally posted by drunkenj
i was going to comment, but i am too sick of these third hand stories
I usually dont.. but knee on chest is a quick answer that I was shocked no one mentioned. Knee on Chest = not getting kicked/stomped in the head.
Posted On:2/11/2004 10:11am
Style: Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu
If *I* were on the bottom?
That's not where I want to wind-up in a fight. My finger would have been in his brain already. Then we'll see how easy it is for someone to "rain down punches" from a position he never would have gotten anyway since I don't train for people to get on top of me.
Posted On:2/11/2004 10:16am
the people probably only started on the big guy because he was killing the guy on the bottom
Posted On:2/11/2004 11:25am
Style: Be Happy
Now if you dont know how to get a guy off your chest raining punches on you could end up being beaten to death by his buddies. If you go down to the ground in a multiple attacker situation the obviously thing to do is try to get back up again as fast as you can and run like hell. Sure you may get few bruises and what not but hopefully you'll come home alive.:(
Last edited by Freddy; 2/11/2004 11:27am at .
Ghost of Charles Dickens
Posted On:2/11/2004 12:53pm
Originally posted by keinhaar
If *I* were on the bottom?
That's not where I want to wind-up in a fight.
Many have said that. None have yet succeeded in doing it.
My finger would have been in his brain already. Then we'll see how easy it is for someone to "rain down punches" from a position he never would have gotten anyway since I don't train for people to get on top of me.
ONE: The finger in brain thing is a myth. It's not actually possible, physically.
TWO: Again, many have tried, none have succeeded.
"The only important elements in any society
are the artistic and the criminal,
because they alone, by questioning the society's values,
can force it to change."-Samuel R. Delany
RENDERING GELATINOUS WINDMILL OF DICKS
THIS IS GOING TO BE THE BEST NON-EUCLIDIAN SPLATTERJOUST EVER
It seems that the only people who support anarchy are faggots, who want their pathetic immoral lifestyle accepted by the mainstream society. It wont be so they try to create their own.-Oldman34, friend to all children
Such as thou art, sometime was I.
Posted On:2/11/2004 1:28pm
Style: Brazilian Jiujitsu
Yeah I know. I don't even care to answer these things anymore. Good on ya for trying.
Normally, I'd say I was grappling, but I was taking down and mounting people, and JFS has kindly informed us that takedowns and being mounted are neither grappling nor anti grappling, so I'm not sure what the **** I was doing. Maybe schroedinger's sparring, where it's neither grappling nor anti-grappling until somoene observes it and collapses the waveform, and then I RNC a cat to death.----fatherdog
Posted On:2/11/2004 1:42pm
tell me what would have happened if they never went to the ground, and two guys from the crowd ran in and started punching the big guy in the face?
not much difference.
Posted On:2/11/2004 2:33pm
I do not know ANY accomplished grappler who says he can take on multiple attackers and win.
I know a couple of WT/Krav Maga/Kempo guys that claim they can.
They cant. Nobody can.
The best you can do is run, or hit/throw and run.
Current stage of death: denial
Professor of Chaos
Posted On:2/11/2004 4:46pm
It really boils down to simple mathematics:
person with TEH GRAPPEL >= chances of getting back up or controlling ground position
person without TEH GRAPPEL <= chances of same
Which would you rather?
Posted On:2/11/2004 4:48pm
I actually do know of a few cases (I talked about it before in some other posts). Its usually just two guys against one. In some circumtances they eventually were able to get free and run.
Last edited by Freddy; 2/11/2004 5:21pm at .
Articles and Reviews
Tools and Info