218358 Bullies, 5611 online  
  • Register
Our Sponsors:

Results 21 to 29 of 29
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Sponsored Links Spacer Image
  1. nomamao is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    666

    Posted On:
    9/24/2009 5:45pm


     Style: Hung Ga Kung Fu

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Yeah, if you find a school that goes out and competes often enough, you shouldn't be led astray.
  2. It is Fake is offline
    It is Fake's Avatar

    Administrator

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    33,609

    Posted On:
    9/24/2009 5:48pm

    staff
     Style: xingyi

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Ming Loyalist View Post
    that competition should be in full contact and not point fighting tag. this issue gets overlooked often so i thought i should point it out.

    the place might compete every month but if it's not full contact than i wouldn't put a lot of weight in their training.

    it's fine if they *also* compete in point fighting (kids or beginners) but the seniors should be fighting full contact sanda or lei tai.
    True.
  3. Kovacs is offline
    Kovacs's Avatar

    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kent - UK
    Posts
    1,539

    Posted On:
    9/24/2009 6:04pm


     Style: Kettles (MA hiatus).

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Yoj View Post
    Also, dont mistake aliveness for roughness, aliveness doesnt have to be rough, but a lot of clubs train very rough, but still compliantly.

    You seem to be leaning towards striking arts primarily, so muay thai or similar might be a good idea to check into.
    That's very true. When I was doing Chun the training was 100% compliant yet you could strike relatively hard. This sounds quite brutal and looked and felt pretty badass at the time... but it's not, no way, it's pointless and was a waste of time. It makes the senior feel tough and the junior like a chump so it does favours to no one except the guy that takes the tution fees.

    Muay Thai is a great suggestion (or boxing, off the bat), striking wise, cuts the bullshit for all involved.
  4. PointyShinyBurn is offline
    PointyShinyBurn's Avatar

    Gnarly King of Half-Guard

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    4,226

    Posted On:
    9/24/2009 6:09pm

    Join us... or die
     Style: BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Whereabouts are you? Might well be able to recommend some gyms for you to try out. If you're anywhere near Leicester then Leicester Shootfighters are generally very highly regarded: http://leicestermma.wordpress.com/ , for example.

    MMA properly means competition under a rule-set that allows both grappling and striking and schools that put fighters into such competitions. It's hijacking to mean any old crap people care to cobble together is an unfortunate and recent marketing phenomenon.

    Your notion that 'un-watered down' traditional styles are necessarily the most effective is false, I'm afraid. The most effective systems are generally those which have evolved and continue to evolve, just as in other areas of human endeavour like medicine.
  5. opeterson is offline

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7

    Posted On:
    9/25/2009 3:35am

    Bullshido Newbie
     

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I'm in Herefordshire - 2 hour drive to Leicester, although if it's a good school i'd be willing, assuming I could fit a good amount of training into my schedule with the large travelling time. I'll check them out, thanks.

    I wasn't necessarily saying learning a traditional style is the most effective (unless I did say that, in which case please don't embarress me and quote that! :P) - I partly want to because of the way my mind works. I can learn things very quickly and efficiently when I have one thing to focus on, and also tend to enjoy a single focus, but when several are thrown in, I get easily confused. It's mainly making up for my own failing. I use 'watered down' as a broad term, not meaning simplified to make more effective, but simplified to be easier to learn, sacrificing quality.

    I also want to learn a traditional art because I was fed a lot of crap by the Bushido academy of martial arts that went against traditional arts.. and saying its all bollocks etc. etc. and I want to get an opposite view of their bastardised Karate.

    Thanks for the clarification on what MMA means. I've definately never done MMA!
  6. PointyShinyBurn is offline
    PointyShinyBurn's Avatar

    Gnarly King of Half-Guard

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    4,226

    Posted On:
    9/25/2009 4:04am

    Join us... or die
     Style: BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by opeterson View Post
    I'm in Herefordshire - 2 hour drive to Leicester, although if it's a good school i'd be willing, assuming I could fit a good amount of training into my schedule with the large travelling time. I'll check them out, thanks.
    In that case I'd give these guys a try: http://www.thecombatacademy.com/
  7. creativo is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    383

    Posted On:
    9/25/2009 4:27am


     Style: Judofitness

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by opeterson View Post
    I wasn't necessarily saying learning a traditional style is the most effective (unless I did say that, in which case please don't embarress me and quote that! :P) - I partly want to because of the way my mind works. I can learn things very quickly and efficiently when I have one thing to focus on, and also tend to enjoy a single focus, but when several are thrown in, I get easily confused. It's mainly making up for my own failing. I use 'watered down' as a broad term, not meaning simplified to make more effective, but simplified to be easier to learn, sacrificing quality.

    I also want to learn a traditional art because I was fed a lot of crap by the Bushido academy of martial arts that went against traditional arts.. and saying its all bollocks etc. etc. and I want to get an opposite view of their bastardised Karate.
    Judo would work well with your way of learning, also depending on the instructor of course. It's traditional AND alive (and great fun), meaning that it works, but it also carries values and principles which are good food for tought, without them being a brainwashing exercise (as I've seen in some silly Karate schools). No striking in judo though.
  8. peeowee is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    66

    Posted On:
    9/26/2009 1:44pm


     Style: Wing Chun

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quite impressive, that one link

    Dave Taylor Qualifications.


    Wing Chun Street fighting Black Belt Level

    Wing Chun Kung Fu Black Belt 3rd Degree

    Wing Chun Tong Black Belt

    Ba Gua Kung Fu Black Belt

    Hsing-I Kung Fu Black Belt

    Wing Chun Dynamics Founder & Master Level

    Chen Jin Iron Shirt Only UK Instructor (Master)

    Silver Medal Gau Sau Fighting
    Midlands open 1993

    British Forms Champion 2001

    European Forms Champion 2002

    International Bodyguard Union Instructor

    Evasive Driving Qualified

    SAS C&R Hereford Instructor

    World Board of Black belts Member

    Hall Of Fame Dedication to Martial Arts

    World United Martial Arts Examiner

    International Bodyguard Union
    Control & Restraint Qualified

    Chauffeur & Bodyguard Active

    British Chinese Council
    Of Martial Arts Member

    Therapeutic Massage Qualified

    First Aid
    Contact Sports, Security &
    Client Safety Qualified

    International Occupational Health Grade A Instructor & Examiner

    The UK School of Self Defence Director

    World Record Holder Breaking Chopsticks on Throat

    British Heavyweight Full Contact
    Contender Trainer

    CRB Teacher Checked

    CRB Security Checked

    NVQ Level 3 teaching Qualified

    Level 2 in Door Supervision Qualified
    Not that I could argue with anything, but isn't black belt more of a japanese martial art thing?
  9. TenTigers is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    143

    Posted On:
    9/26/2009 2:04pm


     Style: Hung Kuen, Jook Lum SPM

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    alot of this is just fodder for the website to attract students. Much of it is the same thing repeated differently. Associations, federations, Hall of Fame's etc are organizations that provide an image of credibility. These are used by alot of commercial (meaning open to the public and proffessional as opposed to a club or basementgym) schools to boost credibility to outsiders checking the place out. It does not mean the guy isn't legit or good, it's just another marketing tool. It's the nature of the business. Doesn't mean he's a McKwoon. There are plenty of public commercial schools that are very good, just as there are many basement non-profit schools that suck. Go check it out and decide for yourself.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Powered by vBulletin™© contact@vbulletin.com vBulletin Solutions, Inc. 2011 All rights reserved.