Most armies in the Mid-East are poor quality
Look back at Saddam's Iraq. Only a poorly trained army would perform so poorly. I hear the Somalis can't shoot for ****, and the Afghans didn't stand a chance against our special forces.
The Iranians couldn't even prevail against Iraq.
The Syrians have lot's of wepondry , but they are old decaying soviet hardware.
And they Israelis have repeatatly kicked their ass time and again.
The Egyptians receive allot of military aid, and have a well armed military, problem is, they are poorly trained.
Israel on the other hand has a well armed and well trained quality military.
Not sure how well they would do on a European battlefield, but they are the power in the Mid-East, and I'm sure they could kick African ass if it ever came to that.
The only two military groups in the Mid-East that have quality training are Israeli IDF and Lebanon's Hezbollha .
I must confess, I can't spell worth fucking ****!
Get the **** to a library.
Why are you still allowed to post?
Originally Posted by sandbag2
I think it is time for another temp ban since, he apparently has forgotten where to post his drivel again.
what was wrong with this post, other than my poor spelling.
This is the place to post military stuff right?
I thought my research was rather accurate
Because you're not saying anything interesting. That, and its fairly obvious you've done little in depth research.
How old ARE you and what actual reserach have you done into any of these militaries other than who won/lost?
I don't know what you guys are talking about, Hezbolla is a paragon of industrialized militaries and iraq circa gulf war 1 was an absolute joke with no air defenses or armor to speak of. Sandbag, please keep writing about history, i'm learning tons.
Originally Posted by Suprore
Have you been to the MidEast like I have?
Originally Posted by elipson