Page 2 of 2 First 12
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Illinois, USA
    Posts
    40
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Finally Shadowrun is here. Where do we get all of the cool cybernetics implanted?

    I thought this clothing has already proven itself down in Colombia.

  2. #12
    adouglasmhor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Glasgow, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,494
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    We had snorkel parkas, skinhead pilot/bomber jackets and reefer jackets with ballistic armour inside in Northern Ireland in 1989, they looked awful though but no worse than the stuff on the site.

  3. #13
    TheMightyMcClaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    3,456
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Knave View Post
    Greetings.

    IMO the ballistic protection offered by that stuff is inadequate.
    And this opinion is based off of....?
    What, did you shoot a guy wearing one of these? Did you buy one and get shot to death, and now type to us from beyond the grave?

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    221
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Greetings.

    First of all, any front buttoning jacket will have a weak spot straight up the center along your entire torso where the ballistic panels meet, unless they overlap which would defeat the purpose of being inconspicuous.

    Second, The cut of the panels will be necessarily inadequate compared to standard vest design due to concessions being made for the article of clothing's appearance, or again you defeat the purpose of being inconspicuous.

    Third, that **** costs retardedly more than standard concealed vests. If you want to spend THOUSANDS on concealable armor, you would be much better off putting down $500-$1000 on a custom fit vest, then spending the rest on a **** ton of custom fit clothing specifically fitted to you with the goal of concealing your vest, rather than spending the same money on ONE article of clothing that, for all it's cost, still will never look quite right, not to mention you lose your protection as soon as you take your jacket off.

    The whole thing is a gimmick, and a stupid one at that.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    215
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Some countries ban the sale and possession of ballistic vests; clothing that includes ballistic materials is not covered by existing legislation (this is the case in Venezuela, not sure about Colombia)

  6. #16
    SFGOON's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,208
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Oh Knave, you're such a card!

    You're not understanding the sensibilities of the people this is marketed towards.

    They are executives, not professional shooty-types.

    They want to look good and impress others with their sick threads.

    They do NOT want to go around with the revolting, yeasty BO that comes with a skin-tight concealed vest.

    They do NOT want to sweat like pigs in front of the Sultan of Brunei.

    They do NOT care how much it costs. If you have to ask, you can't afford it and so on.

    Having slightly lowered protection is worthwhile compromise. They're surrounded by crazy assholes such as myself. If the bad guy gets off a single shot, the exec gets evacuated while the rest of us shoot the bad guy into bad guy butter.

    Have you ever worn body armor Knave? You don't strike me as someone who has much of an idea of what they're talking about.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cullion
    You sound like a foaming-at-the-mouth-loon out of Dr. Strangelove.
    Sometimes, we put Ricin in the Cocaine. :ninja7:

Page 2 of 2 First 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO