Brock vs. Fedor Arguement

**theotherserge** · Posted On: 8/05/2009 1:24am

Originally Posted by oldman34

Let me post this AGAIN for the slower readers in here...

Hope that helped a bit.

Aren't (shouldn't) your posts auto-culled into Sheerdog?

**JahRastanaut** · Posted On: 8/05/2009 2:34am

Originally Posted by Kintanon

Really? I had the impression that Fedor had 8-9 years on Brock. Are they that close in age? If that's the case then Fedor will never lose to Brock. Holy ****... He didn't spend a couple of years in a pro-wrestling meatgrinder either.
So yeah, if the age difference is only 2-3 years then Brock is fucked.

Yeah as the cock lobster is only a year and change younger than fedor, I dont think there is anyway he will ever beat him. Ever.

**oldman34** · Posted On: 8/05/2009 5:06am

Originally Posted by han090

Fedor. No one has listed Brock's losses in MMA fights to wrestlers (with good reason)

My names not Fedor.
List them then.

I found your comparing Fedor's striking to Lesnar's striking (saying they looked pretty close) to be indicative of a lack of respect of Fedor's striking.

So you assumed thats what I meant.....oh ok. You know what assuming does. Fedor still isnt a "striker".
He isnt even a good striker. He is a big guy throwing punches.

And the fact that he won by a strike doesn't mean he's a good striker was my point. Anyone can throw A punch. a professional level striking game is notably different.

I agree, however, it was a win via strike. Therefore it falls under that category. I also said that the numbers can be misleading. MISLEADING.

And I know you said attempt. Is that perhaps why I ALSO said the word attempt? Why would you italicize the word (then repeat it in capitals)as if I had overlooked it? I used it myself. I USED IT MYSELF

Your posts ramble a bit and lack cohesion. You must admit that your last post was a bit hard to read. Kind of like in this one where you just typed in.....

Fedor.

Then started another sentence not about Fedor.

Originally Posted by theotherserge

Aren't (shouldn't) your posts auto-culled into Sheerdog?

That has been handled. Vindication is mine.

**Hesperus** · Posted On: 8/05/2009 10:23am

Originally Posted by oldman34

He is a big guy throwing punches.

A loltastic sentence. You are aware he's an incredibly undersized heavyweight, right?

**Fighting Cephalopod** · Posted On: 8/05/2009 11:58am

Originally Posted by theotherserge

We haven't yet seen Brock fight anyone that matters. Fedor has beaten dudes in their prime

Yes, two of them

Last I spoke with a Russian who is training Fedor, they were prepping for ADCC.

That's good news; I'm interested in seeing how he does.

**Gabetuno** · Posted On: 8/05/2009 1:38pm

Originally Posted by Fighting Cephalopod

Yes, two of them

That's good news; I'm interested in seeing how he does.

Coleman was actually doing well against Fedor both times. It's no doubt that the kind of fighter which gives Fedor the biggest problems are large muscular wrestlers.

Randleman sucks balls, but his speed and strength compensate for his less than top notch wrestling.

As far as Brock's wrestling ability, aside from a very strong blast double, he doesn't seem to have much. It appears from the footage that I've seen that it's his blast double that took him to the NCAA championship and not much else.

Fedor's takedown defense is very very very good. I don't understand how you can say that he doesn't have much takedown D when the guys who took him down are Randleman and Coleman. Usually he manages some pretty stellar reversals mid takedown and ends on top. He's also much more active on the bottom than Mir is, using a foot on hip/closed guard, and a hell of a lot more head movement than Mir's ****-ass lockdown produced.

**TheLordHumungus** · Posted On: 8/05/2009 2:28pm

Originally Posted by Gabetuno

He's also much more active on the bottom than Mir is, using a foot on hip/closed guard, and a hell of a lot more head movement than Mir's ****-ass lockdown produced.

Quoted for being LOL-tastic. Really though, that's not saying much.