Page 3 of 3 First 123
  1. #21
    Hesperus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Great Plains
    Posts
    3,039
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Functional Martial Arts?

    EMA? Effective?

    AMA? Actual? Applied?

    I kinda think we need to grow out of the term martial art, anyway. There's nothing wrong with the term, it is properly descriptive. It's just that when I say martial art, what 95% of the people in the world think is not what I mean.

  2. #22
    dwkfym's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tampa Bay Area
    Posts
    2,020
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Wait. Argumento we draw a line between TMA and combat sports. Although since MA is constantly evolving and that with modern technology traditional uses of MA has been obsolete (almost), the line is non existant except for the differences at the extreme ends of the spectrum. It is further confusing because us contact sport fighters like to call impractical arts TMA. Well, do you think modern TKD is TMA? Isn't it more of a "sport" even if arguably is even less effective than kung-fu, most karate, etc?

    Basically, I see a trend to labeling ineffective arts "TMA."

    Lets think about this before we go further.

    I personally think we should render dichotomy obsolete, since so many "TMA" schools have adopted full-contact training. In fact, we have a word for ineffective TMA. Bullshido. Okay, the word might be too strong for this since it alludes to fraud. How about no-contact arts? NCA? lol.

  3. #23
    dwkfym's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tampa Bay Area
    Posts
    2,020
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Ugh. I made some bad mistakes in my previous post. here is the edited version:

    Wait. Argumento we draw a line between TMA and combat sports. Although since MA is constantly evolving and that with modern technology traditional uses of MA has been obsolete (almost), the line is non existant except for the differences at the extreme ends of the spectrum. It is further confusing because us contact sport fighters like to call non-competitive (non "sport") arts TMA. Well, do you think modern TKD is TMA? Isn't it more of a "sport" even if arguably is even less effective than kung-fu, most karate, etc?

    Basically, I see a trend to labeling ineffective arts "TMA."

    Lets think about this before we go further.

    I personally think we should render dichotomy obsolete, since so many "TMA" schools have adopted full-contact training. In fact, we have a word for ineffective TMA. Bullshido. Okay, the word might be too strong for this since it alludes to fraud. How about no-contact arts? NCA? lol

  4. #24
    1point2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    4,224
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I really liked the original topic.

    This rehashed naming-TMA **** is old.

    Let's talk about chambering, guards, and hikite again. :(
    What a disgrace it is for a man to grow old without ever seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable. -Xenophon's Socrates

  5. #25
    It is Fake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    34,442
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by dwkfym View Post
    Basically, I see a trend to labeling ineffective arts "TMA."

    Lets think about this before we go further.
    Back on topic please. We have a thread that went 2-300 posts IIRC on this same subject. This also caused a major derail in another thread.

    We will never come to an agreement on the use of TMA.

  6. #26
    Scott Larson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    1,830
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I really wanted to know what technique that he thought he needed to put his hand on his hip to do. You don't have your hand at chamber to use oppositional force. Even a jab-cross does that.

  7. #27
    maofas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, North Carolina
    Posts
    2,971
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Pulling the opposite hand to your hip (or some other position on other techniques) is a beginner kihon thing. It makes it easier to feel how power flows through the hips rotating, it helps you to understand, as you move through combos how to generate power from different positions/angles and how techniques better flow rotationally into smooth combinations.

    It also gives you bad sparring habits you need to break if you practice it a lot for a long period of time. You could argue there's no point in not just always training your sparring-form from the get-go. I think a small dose is good to feel, w/e.
    Last edited by maofas; 8/14/2009 7:59pm at .

  8. #28
    MMAMickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,742
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I think I read somewhere the reason for the hand thrusting from the hip was based on an oriental spear thrust, adapted into a punch after the weapons ban on Okinawa. don't know if its true but makes sense

  9. #29
    WhiteShark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Atlanta GA
    Posts
    9,167
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Why did this get Necroed? Also, It is a terrible thread so I'm locking it to never be necroed again. Good bye shitty thread.

Page 3 of 3 First 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO