-
Infidel
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Afghanistan
- Posts
- 2,294
- Points
- 6,130

Posted On:
5/04/2009 9:12pm
Style: Yoshinkan Aikido, MMA--
More reason to separate an SD forum with a Mil/Leo one.
You are not free whose liberty is won by the rigour of other, more righteous souls. Your are merely protected. Your freedom is parasitic, you suck the honourable man dry and offer nothing in return. You who have enjoyed freedom, who have done nothing to earn it -
Infidel
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Afghanistan
- Posts
- 2,294
- Points
- 6,130

Posted On:
5/04/2009 9:13pm -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Orlando, FL
- Posts
- 1,481
- Points
- 1,886


Posted On:
5/04/2009 11:26pm
Style: FMA--
I liked Bram's article. It made sense to me. I'm not a woman though and trying to understand them is beyond my coprehension, so I don't bother.
Using tools is a great idea. Of course learning to use/wield a knife effectively in 2 hours isn't really possible. Nonetheless, I think Bram made a vaild point if a women or any person wants to learn street defense a knife is a safe bet.
I still like your overall original plan for the class. Weapons adds a whole different element that is definately beyond a 2 hr class, Tryng to teach inexpierenced women (or anyone) weapons use/defense is setting them up for trouble. -
--
The hood mentality is crippling disease, that attacks your nervous system. It makes you nervous of the system. Gangsters and hood rats are especially susceptible to this growth stunting mentality. The hood is where I'm from, but it's not what I am. The hood is where I'm from, but it's not what I am. --Keith David--Ice Cube
All I got is genes and chromosomes
Consider me Black to the bone
All I want is peace and love
On this planet (Ain't that how God planned it?) --P.E. -
Infidel
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Afghanistan
- Posts
- 2,294
- Points
- 6,130

Posted On:
5/05/2009 6:54am
Style: Yoshinkan Aikido, MMA--
No idea. Beorn could be a Samurai with his disembowel someone stuff.
Side note, Bram it's creepy when people refer to training together as playing with each other.
Just made my comment because I'm
a. Biased and
b. Don't think Mil/Leo discussions really fit in with womans self defense threads.You are not free whose liberty is won by the rigour of other, more righteous souls. Your are merely protected. Your freedom is parasitic, you suck the honourable man dry and offer nothing in return. You who have enjoyed freedom, who have done nothing to earn it -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Cincy, Ohio
- Posts
- 938
- Points
- 6,243

Posted On:
5/05/2009 9:31am
Style: TKD, judo, MT noob--
Bram,
May I first say that I mis-spoke when I said the "size" of knife is the issue. While length does have some say in how badly you can be cut, there are many more important factors that come into play. Substitute "quality" in for size in my rant and you will know what I meant, hopefully. I had an ex once that carried a knife for self defense, it was about as dull as a table knife, not very good for slicing. If you teach the use of a knife, you have to teach at least the basics of knife maitenence, which is something most people don't want to be bothered with, in my experience.
Furthermore, I will openly state that I am in no way formally trained in edged weapons, and that all my experience comes from informal training with a western weapons guy and a few real life experiences. I am not qualified to teach weapons, so I don't do it. I do however, have opinions.
I think we got off on the wrong foot. Having re-read the article, I understand better the point that your wife was trying to make. The reason that I went off on it, and have gone off on other articles like it, was the hyperbole in the style. She made it sound (to me) like carrying a knife is the only way to defend yourself, and that nothing else is as effective. Having read your second post and rereading the article, I am now fairly sure that was not your intent. I am sorry that I went off on your post, but I have been exposed to many people trying to sell the magic virtues of knives in self defense, and most do not know how to use them. Clearly if you teach in an alive manner like you say, you are not one of those people.
I do however, disagree that you can teach someone adverse to violence how to be basically proficient with a knife in a two hour window. I believe that most women would not be comfortable with cutting someone, and I think it would take more than two hours to undo that. I also believe there is a problem with initially drawing the knife, especially if it is a small folding knife. If a woman keeps her knife in her purse it may take her a second to find the knife, and if she is unfamiliar with opening it one handed she may not be able to open it in time. I also believe there would be a problem with retention of the knife. If they miss with one wild swing and the attacker either steps inside the arc or pins the arm down on the follow through (the two ways I have done it) the attacker will be able to control the knife hand, and basically control the knife, giving him a weapon. Basically, I think that they would have too many bad habits and of I encouraged them to carry a knife will minimal training I feel like the most likely scenario would be their knife being taken from them and used against them.
The way I have structured my lesson plan is to include only gross motor movements, and things that even if done incorrectly will not put the women in question in greater danger than they were already in. There are no moves that sacrifice posistion, and most of them are honestly just about improving their position until they are at a point where they can escape. My whole thing is actually about getting away without escalating the level of violence if possible, and that is in opposition to pulling a knife immeadiately. Not saying you are wrong, but it is a different kind of training than the method I am going for.
in conclusion, I may have misjudged you initially, and if I did I apologize. Calling your wife an idiot was probably out of line, but the hyperbole of the article sent red flags up to me. I do not think knives should be carried by anyone without more training than a two hour class can provide. I am also not qualified to teach it even if I thought otherwise, so it is a moot point. It also goes against the overall theme of descalation and keeping stuff from going over the top.
nope, far too much of a libertarian to enforce most municipal laws.
Originally Posted by IIF
my disembowel comment was hyperbole in response to the hyperbole of the article. In hindsight, probably could have been stated better.
Originally Posted by GuiltySpark
the whole reason I posted this here was that most of the time it is LEOs who deal with cases of domestic violence, robbery, and rape. Since they are better informed on the nature of these crimes than I am, I was seeking input. I designed my outline based on the studies I looked at, which stated that a women was more likely to be raped by someone she knows than a stranger breaking into her house at night. So I designed something that was very different than the usual "there is a rapist in every alleyway and you will have to fight for your life" deal. I wanted to see if leos agreed. -
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Guam
- Posts
- 6
- Points
- 1,005

Posted On:
5/08/2009 12:31am
Style: FMA--
Beorn,
First, very classy of you to apologize like that. Most folks wouldn't.
I know Bram personally and have had the opportunity to train with him, something I'm very thankful for. (Hi Bram, Dan Murray here). In 13 years of training, I'd take his knife system over anyone elses I've seen both for practicality and use of force considerations.
I've also been teaching Women's Self Defense Seminars for 5 years now as well as beineg a Military Police Officer. I think your basic plan is a good one and that a lot of good ideas have been presented in this thread.
2 hours is just not enough time to teach an effective unarmed course covering all areas of a potential assault. I usually teach 4, 2 hour classes and even then I keep things very simple.
2 hours of situational awareness, boundary setting, common sense
2 hours of strikes (Palm strike, knee strike, eye gouge, hammerfist)
2 hours of grappling/escapes (Upa, guard, bearhug/choke escapes, etc)
2 hours on improvised weapons (being mentally willing to use them and very very basic ideas on how to use them)
Every day also includes full impact drills on a padded assailant (in a Red Man Suit with an old school FIST head gear).
One thing to consider that i've noticed in all my seminars is many students will have an aversion to getting on the ground and actually practicing ground work. It feels natural to us because we do it often but to a first time student, it's a big leap.
I've read that out of a 4 hour seminar, most people will be lucky to retain 20% of what you have showed them. The main things you can hope to impress upon them are common sense and confidence.
Good Luck with the course and please update us on how it went. If you'd like to discuss it more, feel free to drop me a PM.



Reply With Quote












Posted On:
5/04/2009 6:59pm