223825 Bullies, 4214 online  
  • Register
Our Sponsors:

Results 11 to 19 of 19
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Sponsored Links Spacer Image
  1. DdlR is offline
    DdlR's Avatar

    Light Heavyweight

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,771

    Posted On:
    3/13/2009 8:48pm

    supporting member
     Style: Bartitsu

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    We addressed this sort of question in the first thread in this forum. I proposed then (as now) that discussions of hybrid European and Asian styles such as SAMBO and Bartitsu would be fine for the WMA forum as long as the discussion remained focused on the WMA aspects, allowing for whatever sensible digressions were necessary to maintain useful conversation/learning.

    The "danger" is that, as has happened on many other WMA forums on other MA message boards over the past ten years or so, "Western" is assumed to mean "everything not from Asia" and the forum ends up becoming a kind of miscellaneous file.

    Thus, this is not the place to discuss truly interesting topics such as Native American, African nor Middle Eastern MA, unless the topic also somehow revolves around WMA.
  2. Permalost is online now
    Permalost's Avatar

    pro nonsense self defense

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    12,530

    Posted On:
    3/13/2009 11:41pm

    supporting member
     Style: FMA, dumbek, Indian clubs

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I think an everywhere else forum could be pretty interesting. There's a lot of interesting martial traditions from neither Eastern or Western civilization. It would have to be mostly an academic one though, since I doubt we have many practitioners of these styles.
  3. DdlR is offline
    DdlR's Avatar

    Light Heavyweight

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,771

    Posted On:
    3/14/2009 12:06am

    supporting member
     Style: Bartitsu

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    An "everywhere else" forum was actually the suggestion that (eventually) led to this forum. I agree that it would be very interesting. Technically, MABS is supposed to be the venue for serious historical discussion, and we have had a few good threads in there over the past couple of years, although they get interrupted by people confused by the fact that they're not Bullshido "investigations".

    Go back far enough and we actually had a History forum, which IMO was one of the most interesting areas of this site.
  4. willaume is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    windsor UK
    Posts
    344

    Posted On:
    3/14/2009 3:13pm


     Style: aikido, medieval fencing

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Does it really mater?
    How many threads do we have on great-Zimbabwian shield and spear or Abbasid wrestling?
    If and when we can surely create a sub-forum?

    phil
  5. slower is offline

    Featherweight

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    10

    Posted On:
    3/30/2009 7:53pm

    Bullshido Newbie
     

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Hi. Thanks for the book.

    What is the difference between the 1944 version and the 1959 version?
  6. DdlR is offline
    DdlR's Avatar

    Light Heavyweight

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,771

    Posted On:
    3/30/2009 7:59pm

    supporting member
     Style: Bartitsu

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by willaume View Post
    Does it really mater?
    How many threads do we have on great-Zimbabwian shield and spear or Abbasid wrestling?
    If and when we can surely create a sub-forum?

    phil
    The problem is the past was that threads on little-known styles ended up in the YMAS Forum by default, because it is the "general martial arts" forum. However, because it's also the "comedy forum", those threads tended to fall apart and we lost some opportunities to learn about some interesting lesser-known martial arts.
  7. willaume is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    windsor UK
    Posts
    344

    Posted On:
    3/31/2009 12:07pm


     Style: aikido, medieval fencing

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by DdlR View Post
    The problem is the past was that threads on little-known styles ended up in the YMAS Forum by default, because it is the "general martial arts" forum. However, because it's also the "comedy forum", those threads tended to fall apart and we lost some opportunities to learn about some interesting lesser-known martial arts.
    Fair comment mate,
    I can see what you are getting at, and I supposed that it may not suit one group to be mixed with the other.
    That being said, I would never have know of that American judo, if was not here.
    and it is better here than in the YMAS....

    phil
  8. lklawson is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    964

    Posted On:
    3/31/2009 10:35pm


     Style: Bowie

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by slower View Post
    Hi. Thanks for the book.

    What is the difference between the 1944 version and the 1959 version?
    Not much really. I believe that the '44 edition has one additional technique which was not included in the '59 edition.

    IMS, the '59 edition even uses the same photos. Makes sense because the publisher/writer doesn't have to go to the expense and headache of doing new photos or drawing new illustrations. However, it's not unheard of, by any stretch, for a second addition or abridgment to have totally new or updated pics. A perfect example is Allanson-Winn's "Boxing." The earlier edition has different photos and drawings from the latter (the latter is better for the most part). And I would really have appreciated it if Cosneck had done his Military/Police training photos in something other than speedos. I tell ya, it's really strange looking at a picky of a guy showing a LEO arrest and pat-down technique wearing 1940's wrestling trunks. :P The '59 edition would have been the perfect excuse for Cosneck to go put on a Coast Guard duty uniform or something.

    But that's one of the things that makes Cosneck's manual unique among the WWII "Combatives" manuals.

    Peace favor your sword,
    Kirk
  9. Permalost is online now
    Permalost's Avatar

    pro nonsense self defense

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    12,530

    Posted On:
    4/01/2009 1:23am

    supporting member
     Style: FMA, dumbek, Indian clubs

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by lklawson View Post
    And I would really have appreciated it if Cosneck had done his Military/Police training photos in something other than speedos. I tell ya, it's really strange looking at a picky of a guy showing a LEO arrest and pat-down technique wearing 1940's wrestling trunks. :P The '59 edition would have been the perfect excuse for Cosneck to go put on a Coast Guard duty uniform or something.

    But that's one of the things that makes Cosneck's manual unique among the WWII "Combatives" manuals.

    Peace favor your sword,
    Kirk
    As goofy as it looks, the old school wrestling trunks look like the ideal garb for a fighting instructional photo series. It allows for a more precise view of what's going on, IMHO.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Powered by vBulletin™© contact@vbulletin.com vBulletin Solutions, Inc. 2011 All rights reserved.