-
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Posts
- 5
- Points
- 441
Posted On:
3/18/2009 10:56am
--
i just spent the weekend learning from rickson in nashville, tn. he refused to explain, even in person. he made us "feel" the technique personally with him.
he also placed an emphasis on the idea that sport jiu jitsu is not jiu jitsu. he did not deride sport jiu jitsu, just said it was missing the point of the original art established by his family.
this is my first post here. not sure if i added anything to the discussion, but there ya go... -
Light Heavyweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Pensacola, FL
- Posts
- 3,740
- Points
- 5,514


Posted On:
3/18/2009 11:02am -
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Posts
- 5
- Points
- 441
Posted On:
3/18/2009 11:47am
--
he didn't mention this program specifically, but he did say that he would never in his life release a video or a book.
and based on his teaching style, i would guess he is not a fan of this idea. emphasis on "feel" and "connection" and "invisible jiu jitsu" indicates that he would find that style of teaching far inferior to actual, personal instruction. -
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 1
- Points
- 32
Posted On:
3/18/2009 12:41pm
Style: Brazilian Jiu Jitsu--
I am literally just two weeks into my training in BJJ. Before that I had no experience with the art. I chose Ralph Gracie's school. I took alot of time researching various schools and their philosophies before choosing. In fact, I work 10 minutes from the Torrance GJJ Academy and decided against it and now drive half an hour to Anaheim.
I quickly discovered the difference just by listening and watching a few beginners classes at each facility (including Torrance) and taking the introductory lessons at each (4 different schools visited).
What stuck out to me and caused me to avoid GJJ was this...GJJ promotes a style effective against "unskilled attackers". I don't know about you, but if I get into an unavoidable situation, I hope to be prepared for the guy who does know something as well as the "untrained attacker".
So take heart. There is hope for those getting into BJJ. I am brand new without any prior knowledge and I think the right decision was made. -
Featherweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Lexington, KY
- Posts
- 43
- Points
- 235
Posted On:
3/18/2009 12:53pm
Style: BJJ--
This is just a clear example of the evolution of greed. How many schlubs will buy the videos and "train" on their sibling/neighbor then end up getting their face smashed in during a real fight? I find it a little funny that the Gracie Academy is distancing itself from sport jujitsu when it was Royce competing in the Octagon that made GJJ/BJJ so wildly popular in the first place.
-
BJJ since Nov 06
Achievements:- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Bristol, UK
- Posts
- 2,480
- Points
- 2,854
Posted On:
3/18/2009 1:27pm


slideyfoot.com | bjj resources Style: BJJ--
Yes, but remember there weren't any time limits back when Royce was winning championships, so they might well argue it isn't quite the same thing. The time limit has been a recurring sticking point ever since, criticised by Helio, Royce and Rickson. Like I mentioned earlier:
(Gracie Jiu Jitsu Advanced, Volume 4, 1998)
Originally Posted by Helio, 1998
(Black Belt, December 1995, pp31-33)
Originally Posted by Royce, 1995
That's also why he demanded special conditions for his fight with Sakuraba in Pride, though as it turned out, the lack of a time limit didn't do him much good.
Rickson said something similar to Royce:
(Black Belt, February 1997, p16)
Originally Posted by Rickson, 1997
That same year, Royce clarified his dislike of time limits:
(Full Contact Fighter, 1997)
Originally Posted by Royce, 1997
-
Light Heavyweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Pensacola, FL
- Posts
- 3,740
- Points
- 5,514


Posted On:
3/18/2009 1:27pm

Style: Stick, Taiji, combatives--
Actually I agree with some of the things they are saying against sport jiu jitsu. The problems that I have seen with people that I roll with is that some of them have spent a lot of time learning, belt chokes, sleave chokes, and collar chokes. Then we they jump into the nogi side they get flustered. Especially when we start adding striking into the mix. Then they get pissed off.
I agree that it is good to broaden the horizons to allow nogi and striking. However, the phylosophy is not what I have problems with. I have problems with them actually promoting people who have no experience, and have never trained with someone who has at least a little bit of knowledge.
The phylosophy is fine. The training is bad. If they were going it like the Machado site, this wouldn't be an issue. This GJJ deal is just stupid. If anyone has ever actually done the Machado online stuff (which I have) you will see the difference. Their stuff is 100 times better than this. -
BJJ since Nov 06
Achievements:- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Bristol, UK
- Posts
- 2,480
- Points
- 2,854
Posted On:
3/18/2009 1:49pm


slideyfoot.com | bjj resources Style: BJJ--
Speaking of their philosophy, they have a series of videos which lay out the theory. Rener makes an interesting point in this one, for example:
That again sounds like the TMA mindset Rorion exhibited in the blue belt handbook (quote here). After all, one of the big problems with many martial arts is that they simply discount grappling, without realising that the best way to learn how to defend against it is to actually learn grappling yourself. So in that respect, there's a certain similarity between what Rener says above and the typical _ing _un anti-grappling ideology.
Originally Posted by Rener, 2009



Reply With Quote













Choked out by Gene Lebell
Posted On:
3/17/2009 4:18am
Style: Judo