Thread: Strength vs Endurance
1/18/2009 7:49pm, #11
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
I have to disagree with your opinion on cardio and conditioning Emevas. It isn't that running doesn't have a positive transfer to combat sports but rather that the way in which most people run doesn't meet the energy needs of combat sports. This is the same issue that arises in the analogy of the boxer you raised. The boxer has developed the energy systems appropriate for boxing which are not the same for running hence why he cannot excel at running.
My take on conditioning is stolen from The Thinker on elitefts. You first need to analyze a sport and determine its energy requirements and then tailor your conditioning program to match these needs e.g. match the intensity and length of exercise to the sport. For combat sports things like HIIT and tabatas seem to best fit these requirements. The problem I have with using sports training itself as the primary conditioning tool is you run into the inevitable problem of increasing sports specificity without first developing the appropriate levels of physical preparedness.
1/18/2009 7:56pm, #12
I'm all for GPP for the sake of raising phsical preparedness, just not for the sake of developing specific skillsets.
I agree with you totally on HIIT and tabata being great methods for increasing your conditioning, my question is though, why must it be running? Again, could one not do HIIT in the form of grappling, with bouts of high intensity mixed with lulls? Of, if not free rolling, a drill that at least more closely mimics the sport. Hell, I'd even go with throwing drills with a dummy or something.
I dunno, maybe I'm just burned out with the solution to everything being "running""Emevas,
You're a scrapper, I like that."-Ronin69
1/19/2009 3:35am, #13
I think the problem is that an awful lot of people aren't fit enough to really benefit from HIIT or Tabata.
What happens to the guy who struggles to jog a mile in 9 minutes when he tries to do 'Tabata' after reading about it on the Internet?
He does 8 x 20 second rounds of something at far too low an intensity for it to count as Tabata work and then wonders a few months later why he's making such slow progress with his conditioning. I have been that guy.
There really is such a thing as 'aerobic base' and I'd wager that a lot of people reading the physical training forum still need to work on theirs.!!RENT SPACE HERE FOR 10 VBUCKS PER LINE PER MONTH!!
!! PM ME FOR SPEEDY SERVICE !!
Sponsored by our first customer: Repulsive Monkey
I <3 Sirc.
1/19/2009 4:00am, #14Originally Posted by Cullion
As for weights, I was discussing this with the guys at sambo over the weekend, the guys were looking at kettle bells, but in my view doing heavy strength training with lifts like squats, and lifts that incorperate explosiveness like cleans are much more beneficial.
1/19/2009 12:19pm, #15
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
Asriel - sorry if I missed this, but what are your specific goals? What kind of shape are you in now? What is your training program like now? And how much time do you have to train? Also, what do you consider an endurance event or time frame?
The reason I ask is because the whole strength v endurance debate doesn't make much sense outside the context of your goals. If you just feel like you need to work on both for GPP needs, you're probably (there's more than 1 way to do this) talking about cycles of 6-8 weeks where you concentrate on strength or aerobic base while figuring out a way to maintain/not lose much of the other.
Because, I'm assuming, you still want to get better at BJJ, you'll also have to tweak things so that you're fresh and absorbing your grappling training. This means that you'll probably have to dial down the intensity of your strength/aerobic training. Maybe by a lot.
Also, I wouldn't get too tied up in the endurance thing (and I'm a triathlon coach). As a by product of your general fitness training, you should be able to run 15 - 20 minutes at an even pace without killing yourself. (If you can't, then your aerobic base does need work). For a lot of endurance athletes, 15 minutes is barely a warm-up.
If you get your training routine / goals up, it might be easier to get more specific.
1/19/2009 2:42pm, #16
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
Actually mate, my one goal off the mat is to improve my conditioning for on the mat. I was quite happy training 3-4 times a week and doing strength training 2-3 times a week until I became the unwilling centre of the strength vs endurance argument. So I thought I'd see what the peeps on BS thought." The reason elite level MMAists don't fight with aikido is the same reason elite level swimmers don't swim with their lips." - Virus
" I shocked him with my skills on the ice becuase Wing Chun is great for hockey fighting." - 'Sifu' Milt Wallace
"Besides, as you might already know (from Virus, for example) - there's only 1 wing chun and it sucks big time" - Tonuzaba
"Even when I'm promising mayhem and butt-chicanery, I'm generally posting with a smile on my face." - Sochin101
"That said, if he blocked my hip on a drop nage, I would extend my leg into a drop tai Otoshi and slam him so hard his parents would die." - MTripp
1/19/2009 3:26pm, #17
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
Heh - if you're still making progress and enjoying yourself, it doesn't sound like there's any reason to change.
1/19/2009 3:46pm, #18
Just to toss it out there, I suspect alot of us hobbyist types do off day cardio (and strength) because we haven't got time in our schedules for actual skills sessions 6 or 7 days a week. So it's still a reasonable question even if both strength and endurance training that way are sub-optimal.
Also, I wonder how much those pros doing running and other non skills related cardio has to do with fear of injury. I wonder if pushing themselves in sparring hard enough to really drain their tanks every day would carry an unnaceptable risk.
1/19/2009 3:55pm, #19Originally Posted by Emevas
I jump rope. Hate it even more than I do running, but it seems to kick my @ss more efficiently, plus it makes me feel like Rocky.
1/22/2009 11:45pm, #20
Firstly, I agree with the argument that -- beyond basic GPP -- doing a skill is the most important part of building cardio for that skill. My suspicion is that this has mostly to do with central nervous system adaptation for the tasks (i.e. more efficient motor programs).
That said, it's difficult to roll hard 6 days a week without getting injured. We've got some 18-19 year old guys who do it. I can only do 3-4 days/week. One of my coaches, who's ~45 now, says he can only go hard 1-2 times/week. So the question becomes, what about the other days?
Originally Posted by Emevas“Most people do not do, but take refuge in theory and talk, thinking that they will become good in this way” -- Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, II.4