222069 Bullies, 4031 online  
  • Register
Our Sponsors:

Results 31 to 40 of 285
Page 4 of 29 FirstFirst 1234 567814 ... LastLast
Sponsored Links Spacer Image
  1. Anna Kovacs is offline
    Anna Kovacs's Avatar

    Spear Sister

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    6,421

    Posted On:
    1/14/2009 5:13pm

    supporting membersupporting member
     Style: Dancing the Spears

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    My interpretation is that the depictions we see of the old timey boxing stances are probably somewhat exagerated and stylized. Much like when you see fight poster photos of todays boxers and kickboxers they're holding their hands in positions that are only vaguely similar to the position you should actually fight from..
  2. Anna Kovacs is offline
    Anna Kovacs's Avatar

    Spear Sister

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    6,421

    Posted On:
    1/14/2009 5:14pm

    supporting membersupporting member
     Style: Dancing the Spears

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by 3moose1
    Ken is a nice guy, though. You and Kidspat seem to tag team up on people with rudeness.
    I don't think it's rude to make technical criticisms on a topic that I'm pretty damn well versed in.

    PS: it's not tag-teaming, it's having the same opinion on stuff. We just happen to feel the same way and feel compelled to post on most of the same topics.
  3. 3moose1 is offline
    3moose1's Avatar

    United States Marine.

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    San Clemente
    Posts
    9,530

    Posted On:
    1/14/2009 5:24pm

    Join us... or die
     Style: MCMAP, BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    You completely ignored the part about your dog.


    Honestly, he was presenting history, history, history.

    This is his interpretation of it, and that is all history really can be, an interpretation of the facts. No one was there, so we don't know EXACTLY how they stood, etc. We can make extremely educated guesses and conjectures, but that is it. He is explaining how they stood when dealing in a PARTICULAR rule set.


    some (girly men) pull guard in jits tournaments. There is a reason for this, it fits in well with the rule set.

    I COMPLETELY forgot what the point i was trying to make with that above line was...

    PROOF that I'm not a completely useless poster:
    http://www.bullshido.net/forums/show...0&postcount=58


    Quote Originally Posted by Cy Q. Faunce
    3moose1 is correct. Sig THAT, you fucker.

    Quote Originally Posted by sochin101 View Post
    I went out with a delightful young woman who was on a regimen of pills that made her taste of burned onions.
    That is not conducive to passionate cunnilingus, my friend, let me assure you.
    Quote Originally Posted by HappyOldGuy View Post
    I agree with moosey
  4. Snake Plissken is offline
    Snake Plissken's Avatar

    When I Get Back

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,559

    Posted On:
    1/14/2009 5:44pm

    supporting member
     

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by AnnaTrocity
    My interpretation is that the depictions we see of the old timey boxing stances are probably somewhat exagerated and stylized. Much like when you see fight poster photos of todays boxers and kickboxers they're holding their hands in positions that are only vaguely similar to the position you should actually fight from..
    Read Anna's comment again, it is the key moose:

    it is stagnant.

    There is no movement to show the footwork, upper body movement, head movement, hand movement.

    Part of the problem with olde timey boxing photos is:
    the guys had to stand still for awhile while the picture was taken.

    Part of the problem with current fighter pictures is:
    they want you to see the face and when the put the images of the two fighter together, sometimes they digitally alter positions so they can fit in.

    Sometimes the drawing *try* to depect the slipping of a shot which is why they look the a strong wind is pushing them back.....sometimes they are trying to capture and illustrate they fighter is fighting the "HONORABLE" fighter and standing upright.
  5. DdlR is offline
    DdlR's Avatar

    Light Heavyweight

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,765

    Posted On:
    1/14/2009 5:53pm

    supporting member
     Style: Bartitsu

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by KidSpatula
    Yes, I was doing the experiment as was stated it should be done. Twisting the wrist from horizontal to vertical makes no difference. I tried it again, putting my weight on the wall to see if this changed anything. It did not. I see no reason to believe there is a mechanical advantage to using a vertical fist. What I do know is that I've always been taught to corkscrew my punches for a stronger punch, which is basically the opposite of using a vertical fist. The only advantage I see to the vertical fist is that you can slip it through someone's guard a bit more easily.
    Hmm. Well, when I do the experiment, it does work as it's supposed to; might be a matter of different skeletal structures, etc.

    Out of curiosity, what boxing credentials does he have besides having supposedly "done boxing" as many years as I've been alive?
    AFAIK Ken's been training for the past twenty-five years; beyond that, I don't know what his credentials are, except that he's a good instructor. He coaches modern boxing, stick fighting, old-school pugilism and several other skills (he's also a damn good grappler, currently focusing on Sombo).

    These old time champions obviously know a thing or two about the sweet science I suppose, but they neither wrote the article, nor are they being quoted directly.
    That's right. The article is a brief condensation of some the advice offered in a wide range of books by the aforementioned champions, from the historical point of view. If you want to read some of them for yourself, you can download a number of the good ones from Kirk's site, read more on GoogleBooks, or check them out of the library (interloan is your friend).

    Since I don't really know what to look for, care to post some examples? You can do your service as a forum bully by making this thread much more informative with some educational videos.
    I live to serve:

    YouTube - Bob Fitzsimmons vs. James Corbett
    YouTube - Jack Johnson vs Tommy Burns (1908)
    YouTube - John L. Sullivan, James J. Corbett and James J. Jeffries
    YouTube - Old Boxing Video

    Seriously, there are dozens of these old fights on YouTube. Search for Bob Fitzsimmons, Jim Corbett, James Jeffries, Jack Johnson, etc. if you want to see more.

    None of this really explains the use of the stance. In fighters are merely one branch of the many styles of modern boxers. There are lots of boxers today that work the outside. None of which stand like these boxers supposedly did. Is it because of the throws? Sanda fighters don't stand anything remotely like this. Is it because of the lack of gloves? Kyokushin fighters don't stand like this either.
    Sanda fighters are allowed to use lower body throws and Kyokushin fighters are allowed to kick. It makes a difference.

    I'm not saying the man is full of ****, but he does a very poor job of explaining his points. This would all be far more informative with sources and some live examples of the technique in application. As is, we just have to assume that he's correct because he's some sort of historical authority.
    Yes, he is a historical authority, and yes, he is correct. The article isn't intended to explain the entire sport of pugilism; it's a brief condensation of some basic points relating to stance and the mechanics of punching with bare fists, specific to the rules of the London Prize Ring and the transitional period between those rules, the Queensberry rules and the modern style.
  6. DdlR is offline
    DdlR's Avatar

    Light Heavyweight

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,765

    Posted On:
    1/14/2009 5:58pm

    supporting member
     Style: Bartitsu

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by AnnaTrocity
    My interpretation is that the depictions we see of the old timey boxing stances are probably somewhat exagerated and stylized. Much like when you see fight poster photos of todays boxers and kickboxers they're holding their hands in positions that are only vaguely similar to the position you should actually fight from..
    You're right, some of them are exaggerated and stylized. There are also the technical limitations of late-1800s studio photography to take into account; you had to stand completely still for a number of seconds or the picture would blur.

    On the other hand, most of the early books are illustrated with drawings rather than photographs, and the written technical text is very specific regarding guard positions, mechanics, tactics etc.
  7. mya is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    (PT) mya231 - gmail.com
    Posts
    48

    Posted On:
    1/14/2009 6:50pm


     Style: GoJu-Ryu (karate) BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by KidSpatula
    " Let's do a little experiment on the difference in reach between a vertical and horizontal fist.

    Well I did this little experiment and all I can say is that what was supposed to be the case was not at all the case for me or Kat. Your reach is exactly the same no matter how your hand is twisted.
    Hey, it worked for me.
    I get a very small space when i change from a Vertical fist to a Horizontal one with knuckles up.
    Not that this 2-3 mm would be of any great usefulness, after all this are punches not blade cuts.
    Still i have to admit that i feel my hand more "protected" and stable with a vertical punch, than with an horizontal one. My Karate teacher is all about Horisontal punches and torsion of the fist at last moment... or what ever. He even adverts me everytimes he catchs me doing Vertical punches.
    But i still think that i would prefer to punch someones face with a vertical punch than with a horisontal one. Body blows i would probably do horisontal.
    That is if i ever punched someone in the head. I would probably kick him in the balls and then do a takedown+ mount and pound, or Ezekiel choke.

    Perhaps i would surprise hook with a horisontal fist on the Temple (head), that would seriously hurt.
  8. Fat Goth is offline

    Featherweight

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    18

    Posted On:
    1/14/2009 7:00pm

    Bullshido Newbie
     Style: WT/MMA

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    back in my lau gar days I was always taught to punch and twist the fist to horizontal at the last moment.

    Is there any real point to doing this from a torsion perspective - genuine (probably stupid) question cos the only mention I've seen on this is on one of Geoff Thompson's videos where he suggests its got a greater chance of cutting your opponent but thats about it.
  9. maofas is offline
    maofas's Avatar

    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, North Carolina
    Posts
    2,975

    Posted On:
    1/14/2009 8:00pm

    Join us... or die
     Style: Kenkojuku Karate, Judo

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Three things:

    1) I couldn't get the experiment to work either as presented, but this worked: extend your arm out with a vertical fist touching the wall and move back until your hand is just barely touching, then rotate over into a horizontal fist and your hand magically comes off the wall a couple of millimeters.

    This only worked, however, if I was using my first two knuckles on both vertical and horizontal punches. If I let my fist lie flat across the bottom 3 knuckles, as everyone who advocates vertical fist punching does, the reach was still superior with horizontal + first 2 knuckles because my first two protrude 8/10 of a centimeter beyond the ring finger's knuckle (yes, there happened to be a tape measure two feet from the computer while reading this).

    2) The upright stance perfect makes sense to me, if the game was more range-based due to lack of gloves + face punches. Upright, your face will be further back and away from harm.

    3) What I don't get about their old-school stances is, upright/hunched or outside/inside...why stand flat-footed? What advantage could that possibly have provided them under any ruleset?
  10. Anna Kovacs is offline
    Anna Kovacs's Avatar

    Spear Sister

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    6,421

    Posted On:
    1/14/2009 8:09pm

    supporting membersupporting member
     Style: Dancing the Spears

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    The old videos posted sure do not at all look like the stances posted about. This furthers my opinion that these depicted "stances" really weren't stances at all and just stylized positions with a vague resemblance to what they were actually doing. Really the guys are moving all over the place and just going balls to the wall so there's no real discernible stance which is quite different from modern boxers who maintain the same position pretty consistently.

    I'm not seeing any reason at all why allowing dumping people on their ass needs to change what I do. I dump people on their ass starting from a modern boxing position all the time.
Page 4 of 29 FirstFirst 1234 567814 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Powered by vBulletin™© contact@vbulletin.com vBulletin Solutions, Inc. 2011 All rights reserved.