-
-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- parts unknown
- Posts
- 176
- Points
- 4,474

Posted On:
11/06/2008 12:16am
Style: Five Animal KF--
I don't know how much money you have to spend, but anyone who feels it necessary to have a basic battery, for whatever reason, should have the following. I'll put it in order of importance.
1) A .22 rifle. I would recommend a Ruger 10/22
2) A .22 pistol. Recommend a six or nine shot Revolver. Smith and Wesson if you can afford it.
3) A battle rifle. SKS rifles could still be had reasonably, last time I checked.
4) A .30/06 bolt action All weather Rifle. Mossbergs and Rugers are reasonable.
5) A 1911 A-1 pistol. Mine is a Springfield Armory. Kimbers are great guns, but expensive.
6) A 12 guage pump shotgun. The Remington 870 is fantastic, but there is nothing wrong with a Mossberg or Winchester.
7) A .357 Revolver. Look at Taurus
8) A lever action .357 or .44 Magnum Rifle. Marlin makes good ones. If it has to be used inside a building, it won't be as likely to go as far as a .30/30 round and hit something or someone you don't want to.
The reason I started with .22s is that, contrary to popular belief, they are not toys. Certain members of my family were poachers during the Great Depression and they took everything they needed, up to deer, with a Sears .22. They can also be used for defense. They are quiet, and deadly, in the right hands.
For sure, get the first three, and then work up.Last edited by Won Dom Fok; 11/06/2008 8:51am at .
-
and humble, too!
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 2,272
- Points
- 12,460

Posted On:
11/06/2008 12:56am
Style: Systema, BJJ, Arrestling--
I wouldn't worry about an assault weapons ban.
The democrats learned the hard way that placing arbitrary bans on ARs leads to all sorts of nastiness, like losing control of the house and senate followed by two-term republican presidency.
I seriously doubt they'll try that **** again for a looooonnngg time. They have a majority. They're going to want to keep it.Sometimes, we put Ricin in the Cocaine. :ninja7:
Originally Posted by Cullion
-
l Travel To Get Choked!
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Seattle WA
- Posts
- 1,828
- Points
- 2,939



Posted On:
11/06/2008 1:18am -
Featherweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 44
- Points
- 2,351

Posted On:
11/06/2008 1:26am -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Right here.
- Posts
- 1,349
- Points
- 5,947

Posted On:
11/06/2008 2:18am
Style: This and that--
Goon got to it before me. Now is a time for vigilance, but not outright panic. Right now its not looking like the Democratic majority is going to be filibuster-proof, and there are even a few pro-gun Dems in the mix. Even the Supreme Court justices that are likely to be replaced in the next four years are liberals anyway. They are more concerned with holding on to and increasing their majority right now than trying to push through legislation that they know damn well could backfire on them.
Its feasible that they might make a run at the 2nd Amendment once they build up enough power to start getting cocky, but it will be a few years before that happens. I'm pretty confident that I will still be able to pick up a Bushmaster ACR in '09 before anything stupid happens.
Of course, I will still be ready, just in case.Can't decide which evil black rifle to buy? My thoughts.I'm not giving you my opinion, I'm telling you how it is. -
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 1998
- Location
- Cow Town
- Posts
- 18,761
- Points
- 38,274




Posted On:
11/06/2008 8:03am



Guy Who Pays the Bills and Gets the Death Threats Style: MMA (Retired)--
Uhh, all you people who are desperately clinging to your belief that a Democrat Congress with a Democrat President won't try the stupid **** they did in 1994...
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:h6257:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
- This Act may be cited as the `Assault Weapons Ban Reauthorization Act of 2008'.
- (a) RESTRICTION- Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding after subsection (u) the following:
- `(v)(1) It shall be unlawful for a person to manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon.
- `(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any semiautomatic assault weapon otherwise lawfully possessed under Federal law on the date of the enactment of this subsection.
- `(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--
- `(A) any of the firearms, or replicas or duplicates of the firearms, specified in appendix A to this section, as such firearms were manufactured on October 1, 1993;
- `(B) any firearm that--
- `(i) is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action;
- `(ii) has been rendered permanently inoperable; or
- `(iii) is an antique firearm;
- `(C) any semiautomatic rifle that cannot accept a detachable magazine that holds more than 5 rounds of ammunition; or
- `(D) any semiautomatic shotgun that cannot hold more than 5 rounds of ammunition in a fixed or detachable magazine.
- The fact that a firearm is not listed in appendix A shall not be construed to mean that paragraph (1) applies to such firearm. No firearm exempted by this subsection may be deleted from appendix A so long as this subsection is in effect.
-
Light Heavyweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- A Hell of my own making
- Posts
- 3,042
- Points
- 6,604


Posted On:
11/06/2008 8:29am -
When I Get Back
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 11,645
- Points
- 28,934



Awards:
Posted On:
11/06/2008 8:37am



Reply With Quote

















Senior Member
Posted On:
11/05/2008 11:06pm
Style: Bjj