-
Dorkus Malorkus
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- Queens, NY
- Posts
- 3,009
- Points
- 15,145

Posted On:
10/11/2008 8:30pm--
BJJ'ers tend to do a lot of positional sparring (ie startiing from guard, mount, etc). And in BJJ there are less restrictions on submissions and how they can be applied. (ie in Judo while doing a rnc you cannot grab or touch the muzzle of the face, some refs may only allow the ude garami that attacks the elbow and not the shoulder)
-
United States Marine.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Detroit
- Posts
- 9,484




Posted On:
10/11/2008 11:18pm--
Bjj is better on the ground, in the same way Judo is better standing
(ne and tachi waza, if i'm not mistaken, which i probably am)
the lack of quality ne-waza comes from everyone learning "competition" judo, which is heavy on the standing, and lacking on the submissions. You basically have 10 seconds (from what i've heard) to get the submission, so instead of wasting energy, you just stall.
That being said, i can name Judoka right now that will school most BJJers.
PROOF that I'm not a completely useless poster:
http://www.bullshido.net/forums/show...0&postcount=58
Originally Posted by Cy Q. Faunce
-
Portrait of a BJJer as a Young Man
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 5,583
- Points
- 20,792

Posted On:
10/11/2008 11:24pm -
United States Marine.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Detroit
- Posts
- 9,484




Posted On:
10/11/2008 11:29pm--
Well, one being taught all the time, and one being taught barely any of the time is certainly a difference.
Originally Posted by Razamataz
With a few word changes, this thread could be about the difference in teaching throwing/takedowns in bjj as opposed to judo.
PROOF that I'm not a completely useless poster:
http://www.bullshido.net/forums/show...0&postcount=58
Originally Posted by Cy Q. Faunce
-
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- The American Desert
- Posts
- 1,029
- Points
- 4,757

Posted On:
10/12/2008 12:48am
Style: Inept BJJer--
There are plenty of differences. For the record I love judo and I don't mean this to be critical, just descriptive. Just off the top of my head:
- The intensity in judo newaza is much higher, since there's less concern for pacing yourself, given the short time limit.
- Because you can win by pinning your opponent in judo, but not BJJ, BJJers who are tightly pinned will often just wait for their opponent to try something and give an opening.
- Because of the point system, BJJers will change positions a lot and work for mount; whereas a judoka would be stupid to give up a winning kesa gatame or kata gatame.
- Knee-on-belly isn't a pin in judo, so it's not used (at least, I never saw it).
- Wristlocks, leglocks. -
Featherweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Sydney
- Posts
- 42
- Points
- 2,560

Posted On:
10/12/2008 1:58am
Style: Judo--
Newaza randori between Judo and BJJ isn't too different, particularly considering that in newaza randori there often isn't a stand up time limit. A big difference is the focus on the pin, which leads to other differences.
To add to aaaargh:
-Judo encourages turtling and even laying flat on your stomach. This is because the pin is an immediate win, escapable by stalling in the turtle or flat stomach positions. BJJ discourages this by giving positional points to back mount and allowing extended time to crack defences.
-On the over hand Judo encourages turn overs, getting someone from the turtle or flat stomach position onto their back. Turn overs aren't so attractive in BJJ where getting back mount is better.
-Judo discourages submissions from a tight pin. Particulary submissions that give up position like an armbar from mount. Why risk a winning pin? In BJJ you can't win immediately from a good pin so taking a submission from there isn't foolish. Of course that doesn't mean people with a score lead won't stall in a dominant position, though in practice stalling isn't very attractive.
-Judo's focus on the pin means a pin worth is determined more so by the control afforded rather than the submissions available. BJJ is the reverse. You can say the heirachy of pins are different.
As for the sankaku shime and ude garami (kimura) I don't see why Judoka wouldn't know them. They are pretty basic bread and butter techniques. -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 246
- Points
- 3,372

Posted On:
10/12/2008 2:29am -
United States Marine.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Detroit
- Posts
- 9,484




Posted On:
10/12/2008 2:34am--
Its kind of like the difference between sorcerers and wizards in DnD.
God, i'm a nerd...
PROOF that I'm not a completely useless poster:
http://www.bullshido.net/forums/show...0&postcount=58
Originally Posted by Cy Q. Faunce
-
You have to work the look.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Bat Country
- Posts
- 2,803
- Points
- 4,620

Posted On:
10/12/2008 3:56am



Reply With Quote















Senior Member
Posted On:
10/11/2008 7:24pm
Style: BJJ, formerly Judo
Teaching Ne-Waza in Judo vs. in BJJ