7/25/2008 12:17pm, #151Originally Posted by Omega
Good point on the "within the ropes" thing.
My point, though, was that the Pride ring and pretty much every boxing ring is actually smaller than the Octagon, so the post I was responding to was fairly dumb.
Aside from the fact that mma in a ring instead of a cage is pretty inherently dumb, as people constantly falling through the ring ropes has ably demonstrated.Undisputed KING OF ASSHOLES.
7/25/2008 12:22pm, #152Originally Posted by Razamataz
Silva got the shot instead, I think probably because at the time, there really weren't a lot of middle weights out there that were viable contenders. And he fucking destroyed the champion.
And then he did it again.
It wasn't just that he won. It's that he won easily, and made it look cool. He's ratings gold.Originally Posted by pauli
Originally Posted by melvin_peebles
7/25/2008 12:28pm, #153Originally Posted by KhorneliusPraxx
No, that's an imperfect circle, I still don't think he's right.
7/25/2008 12:28pm, #154Originally Posted by fatherdog
(24 feet within the ropes)
7/25/2008 12:32pm, #155
*edit my mistake it was a 24 foot ring. I was struck down by my own logic.
7/25/2008 1:25pm, #156Originally Posted by asiliftmeupOriginally Posted by OmegaOriginally Posted by noonyezOriginally Posted by OmegaOriginally Posted by KhorneliusPraxxOriginally Posted by Omega
What about a Pentagon?
Polygons are our friends. Don't be scared and don't deny them.
Real Join Date: Nov. 2003
Originally Posted by Dilbert
7/25/2008 1:53pm, #157
I have a confession to make: I did state, on numerous occasions, that Tim Sylvia had a good chance to beat Fedor and did indeed attempt to ride the Sylvia bandwagon in a most Rocky IVish manner (Is it still a bandwagon if you are alone up there?). I now expose myself to the well deserved mockery and derision of my peers.
PS: Catch pwns BJJ again!
7/25/2008 2:04pm, #158
Just watched the Arlovski/Rothwell fight, holy **** that was a massacre.Tough is not how you act, tough is how you train.
7/25/2008 3:30pm, #159
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
I believe I'm right about the definition of a decagon, but they do look like imperfect circles.
7/25/2008 3:32pm, #160Originally Posted by Vince TortelliUndisputed KING OF ASSHOLES.