Glow in the dark fish!

**Nid** · Posted On: 12/04/2003 7:57pm

Goldfish industry kickbacks! LOL!!

**udo** · Posted On: 12/04/2003 8:05pm

The dogs are not genetically modified, they're inbred. There's a difference. Inbreeding is fine.

**udo** · Posted On: 12/04/2003 8:06pm

They need a picture of the glowing fish.

**Deadpan Scientist** · Posted On: 12/04/2003 8:13pm

They should make glow in the dark children. Imagine your rotten teenage kids trying to sneak out at night while they glow hot pink.

**phoebe** · Posted On: 12/04/2003 8:26pm

Liberals rule. "Your rights end where my feelings begin. Cuz I said so."

What...? Banning something harmless for 'ethical reasons'/feelings is a conservative tendency, not liberal. Of course every person is different and who they vote for doesn't always tell you what their opinions are

They should make glow in the dark children. Imagine your rotten teenage kids trying to sneak out at night while they glow hot pink.

LOL

**Nid** · Posted On: 12/04/2003 8:37pm

What...? Banning something harmless for 'ethical reasons'/feelings is a conservative tendency, not liberal.

When it comes to animals/nature/california, it's liberal. Or "neo liberal" if that makes you happy.

**Dochter** · Posted On: 12/04/2003 9:10pm

It could be argued that a bichon frisee (sp) is more of an aberration. There are glowing fish in the world which were not genetically engineered, there are no "natural" white, tiny afro wearing canids.

Some may think they're cute, I think they're ridiculous.