-
Actual Photo
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Dayton
- Posts
- 8,152
- Points
- 11,784




Posted On:
7/11/2008 1:11am -
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- New England
- Posts
- 9,790
- Points
- 22,190



Posted On:
7/11/2008 1:31am -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- san francisco
- Posts
- 3,177
- Points
- 9,787



Posted On:
7/11/2008 8:56am--
The unfortunate thing is that the Wagner phenomena over at Black Belt is a parallel phenomena that reflect a few truths that are very sad realities.
First on a very general level: the average citizen who had an interest or hobby does not have the interest to be captivated by information that is geared towards an intelligent consumer. This is reflected in the dumbing down of magazines... everything from Scientific American to Black Belt magazine. ARticles are shorter, press releases are all over the place because they are quick contain empty intellectual calories and can keep a wandering distracted mind focused.
Sam and some others on this site know I used to write for the martial arts mags on occasion. I stopped. I would rather post here and have a decent dialogue on an issue like this than have printed material in a magazine that is written for retards. And I mean retards in the literal sense... there has been a slowing of growth in the printed word that represents the martial arts community.
Jim Wagner writes, as Hoc alludes to in a style that entertains. His actual technical work with weapons can not be taken seriously. Sensei Wigginton, one of my teachers, is well regarded in the types of defense that Wagner proclaims to teach and I wouldn't even ask him what he thinks of Jim, as I am quite sure he might maime me haha.
One look and one can see that this guy is a media creation. I always assume and know from working with people in jobs where one deals with violence, that the Jim Wagners of the world are given a little corner of the room and a few playtoys and everybody sort of goes by and smiles at them on occasion.
Calling Jim Wagner on his BS is appropriate. If Hoc manages to shake the foundations of Back Belt in the process all the better. But years ago real writers abandoned Black Belt for greener pastures. And the fact that they endorse Wagner is all the more reason to be very afraid of using anything this tyro presents as a fact. -
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- New England
- Posts
- 9,790
- Points
- 22,190



Posted On:
7/11/2008 9:37am -
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- New England
- Posts
- 9,790
- Points
- 22,190



Posted On:
7/11/2008 9:49am -
Valiant Monk of Booze & War
Achievements:- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Baltimore, MD
- Posts
- 18,243
- Points
- 29,710




Posted On:
7/11/2008 10:16am -
Welterweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- milwaukee
- Posts
- 814
- Points
- 1,295



Posted On:
7/11/2008 10:24am -
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- New England
- Posts
- 9,790
- Points
- 22,190



Posted On:
7/11/2008 10:35am -
Featherweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- New Jersey
- Posts
- 37
- Points
- 2,319

Posted On:
7/11/2008 11:38am
Style: JKD--
Given the current rise of RBSD articles in Black Belt, e.g., the Kelly McCann cover, the veracity of Wagner's credentials is important. However, the cynic in me says that the never ending battle for "market share" also might have a part in this. Wagner may be gilding the lily regarding his credentials, but, a legitimate vet like Hockheim leading the charge concerns me since his group has been more or less FMA/SE Asian MA based in their curriculum; as opposed to the RBSD material currently all the rage.



Reply With Quote





















Posted On:
7/11/2008 12:50am
Jim Wagner's military, police, counter-terror creds in question.