223941 Bullies, 260 online  
  • Register
Our Sponsors:

Results 1 to 10 of 22
Page 1 of 3 1 23 LastLast
Sponsored Links Spacer Image
  1. ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE is offline
    ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE's Avatar

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    North England
    Posts
    643

    Posted On:
    7/04/2008 10:09am


     Style: Judo

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!

    MABS Investigation Layout?

    Hey All,

    I've been reading over a couple of threads in MABS recently and it's struck me that a lot of people come to this site with a specific target in mind, some of them are agenda driven but some of them seem to simply be people who don't get how the forum works, for example:

    Meditations on Violence by Rory Miller - No BS Martial Arts

    It seems to me that this guy probably has a pretty good case as it's been supported by two other students but he's simply not savvy to the way that MABS works and because of that we have about 145 posts of internet drama and 15 with some interesting content.

    What I figure would be a reasonable way to solve this would be to come up with a template for posting accusations that we can sticky, something that gives people a structure to put their posts in and to let them convey what further evidence might be needed or if they feel they are presenting an investigation in completed form.

    I'd suggest then that when anyone posts accusation, a mod asks them to put them in the form of the template and we can then get easier, tighter discussion with a higher signal to noise ratio.

    I'm guessing the template would be something like:

    Name of the accused:
    Name of the accuser:


    Numbered list of fraudulent claims:
    Links to where the individual has made such claims: e.g. website, book and ISBN, video

    List of reasons why the claims being made are fraudulent:
    Evidence supporting the accusations of fraud: again website, book and ISBN, video, scanned certificate images

    <Or alternatively at this point>

    List of evidence the accused could produce to dismiss the accusations:


    Anyway, it probably seems like common sense to a lot of forum regulars, but to people coming in from the outside I figure that something like he list above (Except better obviously :D ) Might be helpful, and it might cut down on the work the mods in this section have to do.
  2. It is Fake is offline
    It is Fake's Avatar

    Administrator

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    33,955

    Posted On:
    7/04/2008 10:20am

    staff
     Style: xingyi

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Slindsay
    It seems to me that this guy probably has a pretty good case as it's been supported by two other students but he's simply not savvy to the way that MABS works and because of that we have about 145 posts of internet drama and 15 with some interesting content.
    He was told specifically (as has happened in other threads) what he needed by Sam, Tem< Erran, and Myself he chose not to listen. Usually when we post the rules/template people without an agenda grumble but, they post similar to your template and give us a snide remark.

    Agenda driven people tend to ignore anything and rest on their credentials.
    This is the only part I disagree with.

    Name of the accused:
    Name of the accuser:


    Numbered list of fraudulent claims:
    Links to where the individual has made such claims: e.g. website, book and ISBN, video

    List of reasons why the claims being made are fraudulent:
    Evidence supporting the accusations of fraud: again website, book and ISBN, video, scanned certificate images

    <Or alternatively at this point>

    List of evidence the accused could produce to dismiss the accusations:


    Anyway, it probably seems like common sense to a lot of forum regulars, but to people coming in from the outside I figure that something like he list above (Except better obviously :D ) Might be helpful, and it might cut down on the work the mods in this section have to do.
    I really do like this list.
  3. TheRuss is offline
    TheRuss's Avatar

    is badder than you

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Not Canada
    Posts
    4,334

    Posted On:
    7/04/2008 9:44pm

    Join us... or die
     Style: None

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I couldn't agree more.

    A bad signal-to noise ratio conceals lies and obscures truth. Establishing templates, standards of proof, etc. as "Do's" to complement the "Dont's" would help honest contributors get to the point and prove their cases without getting bogged down in endless back-and-forth flaming.

    It would also help from the perspective of someone asking questions, as opposed to answering them. I'm sure I'm not the only person here who's noticed the strategy of fraudsters who post here: 1) Avoid the important questions by focusing on irrelevant issues, and when the people asking the questions get pissed off, 2) point at their newer, harsher words as proof of persecution or "bashing" and 3) claim that said bias excuses them from addressing the real issues that have been raised.

    As much fun as it is to verbally beat the stuffing out of liars, frauds, and idiots, I think that a damning and concise thread that winds up among the first few Google results is more devastating than any witty barb.
  4. A.M. is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    190

    Posted On:
    7/04/2008 9:52pm


     Style: none

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRuss
    I couldn't agree more.

    A bad signal-to noise ratio conceals lies and obscures truth. Establishing templates, standards of proof, etc. as "Do's" to complement the "Dont's" would help honest contributors get to the point and prove their cases without getting bogged down in endless back-and-forth flaming.

    It would also help from the perspective of someone asking questions, as opposed to answering them. I'm sure I'm not the only person here who's noticed the strategy of fraudsters who post here: 1) Avoid the important questions by focusing on irrelevant issues, and when the people asking the questions get pissed off, 2) point at their newer, harsher words as proof of persecution or "bashing" and 3) claim that said bias excuses them from addressing the real issues that have been raised.

    As much fun as it is to verbally beat the stuffing out of liars, frauds, and idiots, I think that a damning and concise thread that winds up among the first few Google results is more devastating than any witty barb.
    True. I also like this idea. Standardizing MABS threads can only make them look more professional. I think it's a good idea all around.
  5. It is Fake is offline
    It is Fake's Avatar

    Administrator

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    33,955

    Posted On:
    7/04/2008 9:59pm

    staff
     Style: xingyi

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Actually, MABS is cleaner than it used to be. Thing is, people ignore the rules regardless of the template.

    I would like it as a sticky.

    You'd actually be surprised at the amount of MABS threads moved to, Trollshido, YMAS, noobietown or one of the TMA forums.
  6. ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE is offline
    ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE's Avatar

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    North England
    Posts
    643

    Posted On:
    7/05/2008 3:16pm


     Style: Judo

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by It is Fake
    Actually, MABS is cleaner than it used to be. Thing is, people ignore the rules regardless of the template.

    I would like it as a sticky.

    You'd actually be surprised at the amount of MABS threads moved to, Trollshido, YMAS, noobietown or one of the TMA forums.
    I agree with all this, the fact is I would imagine that the majority of the threads arrive at an accurate conclusion anyway, I just think that standardizing it (Standardizing might not be the right word though) means they can end the right way quicker and be easier for everyone to read through.

    I think another few things that would need to be addressed in the form but the basic outline works as for the majority of accusations we get in MABS, e.g.

    False qualifications/Rank
    Claims of military service
    Fake Fight records
    Street fight anecdotes
    Claims of magical powers
    Misleading contracts

    I'm trying to think though if theres anything else that you routinely see appearing in MABS that might not work in the format above?

    Oh, I also think it would also need a section where the accuser states what their relationship with the accused is, that might steer away some of the people with an axe to grind.

    And maybe in addition, include a bit at the end where the accuser can add any extra information/personal anecdotes and opinion.
  7. shmuel is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    337

    Posted On:
    7/05/2008 3:22pm


     

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I like this idea of the template. It's a good way to go.

    I just have a question about this part:

    List of reasons why the claims being made are fraudulent:
    Evidence supporting the accusations of fraud: again website, book and ISBN, video, scanned certificate images
    When you're dealing with a martial art with potentially fake lineage, how do you produce evidence that this is fraudulent?

    Let's take the infamous ninjer example: Hatsumi has not yet shown proof of his ninja lineage (Togakure Ryu) being any older than his teacher Takamatsu. And there doesn't seem to be much in the way of independent verification of Togakure Ryu's existence.

    Does this count as evidence of fraud? Or does it simply mean that there is no evidence either way?

    The defense that the ninjers often use is that "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". When does this defense hold up and when does it break down?
  8. ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE is offline
    ONE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE's Avatar

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    North England
    Posts
    643

    Posted On:
    7/05/2008 3:35pm


     Style: Judo

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by shmuel
    I like this idea of the template. It's a good way to go.

    I just have a question about this part:



    When you're dealing with a martial art with potentially fake lineage, how do you produce evidence that this is fraudulent?

    Let's take the infamous ninjer example: Hatsumi has not yet shown proof of his ninja lineage (Togakure Ryu) being any older than his teacher Takamatsu. And there doesn't seem to be much in the way of independent verification of Togakure Ryu's existence.

    Does this count as evidence of fraud? Or does it simply mean that there is no evidence either way?

    The defense that the ninjers often use is that "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". When does this defense hold up and when does it break down?
    I think in cases like this where the evidence to back an individuals claims is solely in their possession and not in the public domain (As I believe many MA grades are if you know where to look) Then the guy filling in the template has to say that it's the:

    <Or alternatively at this point>

    List of evidence the accused could produce to dismiss the accusations:


    In cases like this, I think onus falls on the person being accused to produce something to back up their claims and i don't thin that's unreasonable. If you think about it in the real world, it's like someone claiming to be a Doctor but then refusing to provide any evidence, it's more than suspect really and the alternative is accepting every claim on face value.
  9. A.M. is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    190

    Posted On:
    7/05/2008 3:59pm


     Style: none

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Yeah, I would include fake histories on that list. There are so many frauds coming out with made up martial arts they claim come from ninja/vikings/spartans/Native Americans/Africa/Asia/Europe ect. It distorts History and in most cases it is also a form of cultural exploitation so I would include it.
  10. shmuel is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    337

    Posted On:
    7/05/2008 4:08pm


     

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I'm no fan of fake histories, believe me, but I'm just being devil's advocate here.

    What happens when the person who *may* have lied about the history is dead, and his successor believed what he was told.

    This is the position where Hatsumi (ninja guy) is. He didn't come up with the story of the lineage. He got it from his teacher called Takamatsu, who is dead.

    What do we do in cases like this?
Page 1 of 3 1 23 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Powered by vBulletin™© contact@vbulletin.com vBulletin Solutions, Inc. 2011 All rights reserved.