-
Portrait of a BJJer as a Young Man
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 5,583
- Points
- 20,792

Posted On:
2/12/2008 12:10pm--
Is it possible that the people they are certifying are already capable of teaching MMA, and the only thing being taught in the seminar is the "ATT method"? The people attending the seminar might just be getting a curriculum for their MMA school that would then be certified by the ATT so they could use the ATT in marketing their gym.
-
Light Heavyweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Orlando, Florida
- Posts
- 3,378
- Points
- 6,227
Posted On:
2/12/2008 12:18pm--
That would be fine in my opinion. However, that assumes that the instructor was already qualified to teach MMA and that ATT was making instructors apply for the certifation which would require MMA experience at the threshold to get the cert. stamped by ATT.
Originally Posted by Razamataz
However, the tenor of the email reply given to Oldman was that a Tia Chi instructor could pay $7,700 and roll for three days and get an MMA Cert. -
Portrait of a BJJer as a Young Man
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 5,583
- Points
- 20,792

Posted On:
2/12/2008 12:33pm -
When I Get Back
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 11,645
- Points
- 28,934



Awards:
Posted On:
2/12/2008 12:33pm--
good thing I don't have $7,700 burning hole in my pocket.
Originally Posted by GoldenJonas
I was wondering if somewhere within the framework of the contract, since the Level 1 "franchisee", for a lack of a better word, is able to use the name and logo of ATT within their advertising, if they ATT is able to exact some measure of control over the method, verbage or description of the training the student is receiving.
They state in the e-mail Oldie posted: "This program is definitely not set up to train pro fighters. That is what ATT does, we are encouraging schools to capitalize on the mma craze, without losing their traditional roots" and "The ATT gives you credibility of great proportion. Joe Rogan is quoted every UFC event as saying "ATT is the #1 mma camp in the country." I firmly agree.)"
But I don't see anything which allows ATT to remove sanction from a school misrepresenting what ATT's intenitons are

-
Light Heavyweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- East Bay, CA
- Posts
- 4,646
- Points
- 11,148


Posted On:
2/12/2008 12:41pm -
When I Get Back
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 11,645
- Points
- 28,934



Awards:
Posted On:
2/12/2008 12:47pm -
Graviora Manent
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Lincolnshire, England
- Posts
- 6,930
- Points
- 18,681



Posted On:
2/12/2008 1:22pm--
That would be an excellent way forward.
Originally Posted by Razamataz
I don't suppose there'd be a chance that the guys running this scheme would pass on participating school's details for testimonial/research purposes?
Also, props to the ATT guys who have posted on this thread and haven't been afraid to voice their concerns. -
T3h R34l Gangnam Style!
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Indianapolis, IN
- Posts
- 3,636
- Points
- 7,144




Posted On:
2/12/2008 1:56pm -
When I Get Back
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 11,645
- Points
- 28,934



Awards:
Posted On:
2/12/2008 2:01pm



Reply With Quote


















Light Heavyweight
Posted On:
2/12/2008 11:58am
Style: BJJ