Originally Posted by Avery Mauri
Demanding verifiable evidence of alleged mastery constitutes something called "critical thinking", the lack of which can arguably be termed "pathetic".
...yet you all are here bashing and being disrespectful to a master, pathetic.
Stop self-contradicting so hard. You might hurt yourself.
I have not learn under great grand master myself but the man is a genius
How exactly do they know this?
and all of his students(even those who have not meet him) know he made a great fighting system.
A "sensei" according to whom?
I have been learning is style ever since a little kid and know i'm very close to becoming a sensei, even at my young age of 16.
1) How, since you've never met him?
Great grand master fred villari showed us how to fight...
2) What makes you think you can fight?
How exactly do you know you can do this?
You do know--don't you?--the difference between lying and asking for verifiable truth. Asking for actual evidence is anything but disrespectful.
...not lie behind my words and be disrespectful like a lot of you are being
English is apparently not your maternal language. That's no excuse. It isn't mine either and--hopefully at any rate--I'm making myself clear. You are not.
my friend who is the worse who think great grand master Villari system is fake please find a great student like my self and the thousands more and allow us to show you how real it really is.
Vieux Normand is my new hero. This^^^^^^sums up everything about calling bullshido and exposing frauds, grandmasters, professors and sokes.
Originally Posted by Vieux Normand
It also doesn't bode well for the quality control of the system that you're almost a sensei at 16.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO