-
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Scotland/Philippines
- Posts
- 788
- Points
- 6,210

Posted On:
10/17/2007 8:12am -
The Bottom Brick
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 2,069
- Points
- 3,374


Posted On:
10/17/2007 8:50am
Style: BJJ, Ju-Jitsu--
How many hours of instruction are being offered?
If it is in the neighborhood of 80 hours over the 2 weeks this is the norm for military combative instructor certifications.
The sales pitch is a bit over the top, but that is also the norm."Sifu, I"m niether - I'm a fire dragon so don't **** with me!" -
Welterweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Nashville, TN
- Posts
- 643
- Points
- 847

Posted On:
10/17/2007 8:32pm--
Even at 80 hours, that is the equivalent of, say, 14 weeks of BJJ class at six hours a week.
I've done a little more than double that and I barely have my white belt with stripes and I'm nowhere near ready to start teaching anyone anything other than the BJJ tournament point system, much less qualified for a blue belt. Now, I'm no phenom, obviously, but still. 80 hours seems a bit light. -
-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- University of South Florida
- Posts
- 621
- Points
- 1,071

Posted On:
10/17/2007 10:24pm -
Jiu Jitsu - Sometimes passing just isn't an option.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Washington State
- Posts
- 1,720
- Points
- 2,744

Posted On:
10/18/2007 1:15am--
I think that sums it up, cashing in on Army Combatives and what not. It seems specifically worded to imply that you have to be able to be at blue belt level to receive a blue belt but that the certification is separate and you just need to complete the required training.
Originally Posted by Cassius
Also, I didn't know about the 1 month thing with Speed Jiu-Jitsu. I actually have that tape and thought the concepts were interesting. Unfortunately, the production was garbage and the techniques didn't have any logical flow to them. -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- New Jersey, USA
- Posts
- 927
- Points
- 7,251

Posted On:
10/18/2007 7:50am

Style: Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu--
I think the connection between the Combatives Techniques and the Blue Belt is actually intentionally misleading on the part of the advertisers.
If you notice, the ad doesn't say, "When you complete the course, you are awarded a Blue Belt." What it says is, "When you've perfected the 34 Combatives techniques, you'll be awarded your Blue Belt." That's a very different thing.
Now, 34 techniques is well over the "minimum number" of techniques that Royler and Renzo listed as being required for a Blue Belt in their book, Essential Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. But, as everyone knows, it takes a lot more than just knowing the techniques to have perfected them. Knowing the technique and knowing how and when to use the technique are entirely separate concepts.
It looks to me like the Combatives Certification is similarly separate from a Gracie Jiu-Jitsu Blue Belt. The ad doesn't come right out and say as much because more people will join if they think they're actually becoming good at BJJ after two weeks of training (intensive, though it may be).
--Joe -
Hoo Ha!
Achievements:- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- england
- Posts
- 1,683
- Points
- 2,717

Posted On:
10/18/2007 8:11am -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Southern NJ
- Posts
- 2,367
- Points
- 4,569

Posted On:
10/18/2007 8:14am
Style: submission grappling--
Two comments, does anyone have a list of the 34 techniques and could you post it please? Second, there is a big difference between 80 hours of continuous training over 2 weeks and 80 hours of intermittent training over 14 + weeks. I am not saying you would necessarily be a blue belt but your skills would be a lot better than you would think. Also this is not competition level jiu-jitsu.



Reply With Quote













Administrator
Posted On:
10/17/2007 7:44am
Style: Muay Thai & BJJ