Page 3 of 5 First 12345 Last
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    D.C.-ish
    Posts
    475
    Style
    BJJ, No-Gi, MT
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Secondly what is your training emphasis? If itís stupid bodybuilding, then find out what piz reports.
    Doch is right about being certain of your emphasis. Full range of motion squats are good if you're doing light weight and high reps, but if you're doing full range of motion at 315+ lbs. you're asking for knee problems IMO.

    For weight training in rugby, we basically only did 1/4 squats with an emphasis on heavy weight. It wasn't necessary for us to work on the full range of motion because most of the strength/endurance we needed came from that top 1/4 range of motion. At the most we'd go 90 degrees (quads parallel to ground).

    <hr>"There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness is the true method."

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    8,046
    Style
    BJJ
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I've come to the thinking that perhaps the best training regimes for martial artists would be those that mimic the methods used by NFL linebackers, balancing speed with strength. 'Course that mainly just plays into my build.

    Wastrel's more of a kicker.

  3. #23
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Firstly , I think I made it very clear that you you would be doing less weight , and concentrating far more on the Strictness of your Form .

    Dochter , you cant Imagine a Martial App ?

    Youve never had to geet up off the ground while someone was determined not to let you ?

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    8,046
    Style
    BJJ
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    No, instead the apps you are working aren't going to be advanced, IMO, by going past the knees. That range of motion can be worked, perhaps more efficiently, using other lifts. If you significantly reduce the weight to permit your full range of motion you are cheating your quads (which can and should supplementary be worked out, as you mentioned). Instead if you do heavier weights stopping at parrallel you get the benifits of the squat for your quads and can then work out the other muscles of concern secondarily.

    Again I too think form is the key and if you don't go "ass to the grass" with heavy weights make sure you are definitly going fully parallel.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    20,890
    Style
    Shi Ja Quan
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Individual flexabilty is very important when you so squats, if by going full, below parallel, your upper body moves to forward and the lower back and knees take most of the stress, go with either a lighter weight and work up to a heavier one or go to the point that is "comfortable" and technique wise, correct, and gradually increase the depth of the squat, some people are so "stiff" in their ankle and knee joint flexability , that they never go full, and unless you are competing in a event that needs to go full depth, don't, untill you are able without feeling pain or losing balance.
    Try not to do squats and deadlifts on the same day, it maybe be to taxing for your system and your lower back.
    Doing them both will not allow you to acheive the max potential on them, if you do squat first your deadlift will suffer, if you do your deadlift first, your squat will.
    The motion of the squat makes the smith machine the wrong apparatus to use.
    Barbell inside a power rack is the best and only safe way to do squats, unless you have access to some of the more advance machine out there.
    Your stance is VERY important, play around with some foot positions, to find the most comfortable.
    Do this with a light weight of course, and always have your feet pointing out slightly.
    Books by Stuart McRobert ( beyond brawn) can help you.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    18,613
    Style
    Weight Training
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    pffff, they just said to pretty much breathe more

    And the good point was made that it is a new exercise that Wastrel is good, so it will get better in time.


    http://www.wannabebigforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=38341

    --
    Hard Work, Patience, Dedication

    MSN Messenger - just_pizdoff@hotmail.com
    Don't add me if you are going to be an idiot.
    Surfing Facebook at work? Spread the good word by adding us on Facebook today! https://www.facebook.com/Bullshido

  7. #27
    OFFICIAL Mayor of Cwcville supporting member
    Boyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Cwcville
    Posts
    5,388
    Style
    Electricity, Speed
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Yeah, I used to do ass to the grass. Then I realized that I could no longer bend my knees at all. This proved to be detrimental to my training. I started going parallel and within two weeks my knees were fine.
    Captain's Log: Just a little update for all my TRUE and HONEST friends out there:

    1) I am STRAIGHT! I am STRAIGHT! Get it through your thick skulls, numbskulls!

    2) My name is not Ian Brandon Something.

    3) Kacey is coming with me now. I have stolen her from the other Christian Weston Chandler.

    REMINDER: I am still the one and only true creator of sonichu and rosechu electric hedgehog pokemon

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,591
    Style
    BJJ
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I haven't been here a while.
    When did Bullshido's training advice become intelligent ?
    (well Doch was always good...)
    People are even quoting McRobert!

    This stuff isn't that difficult:

    Smith machine:
    This thing was initally designed with the idea that you could get rid of squatters - obviously. The fact it locks you into a specific plane of movement wasn't taken into account.

    Squatting on the smith machine, puts excess stress on your lower back and knees, in a way they are not designed to handle.

    Damage from the machine is known to be cumulative, its not often it happens quickly. (Although saying that, I did develop lower back pain quickly, thats just me personally though...)

    Person A may have a body robust enough that it will never feel the ill effects possible on the machine, person B may not. Its very hard to tell whether your A or B though...

    These things really only exist in modern commerical gyms because in reality there is less chance a person in the gym will badly injure themselves instantly on a smith machine as compared to free squatting.

    There are only so many floor instructors to walk around checking on people, and no one is going to sue because of damage done over many years - as thats going to be hard to prove, and likely the person is not going to realise what its from. However, they may sue quickly if an instructor gives them free squats and they do something stupid and injure themselves badly.

    * * *

    There are great benefits to going past parallel.
    However, this DOES put more strain on the knee joint.
    More strain on the knee joint is not necessarily a bad thing, if your body can take that extra amount.

    While you can dig up horror stories, and also 'facts' that prove its okay, damage from ass to floor squats is generally considered to be cumulative, ie. you may not feel it for many years.

    Both sides of the story when saying 'I can tell you from personal experience' mean very little. Everyone is different.

    So the question is, do you take the risk that in 25 years a medical professional may tell you, you've done damage to your knees, or do you figure that as long as you are careful and use good form, then you'll be okay.

    Your choice. There are far worse things you can do in weigh training than ass to floor squats.
    The Wastrel - So attractive he HAS to be a woman.
    - Pizdoff

  9. #29
    Such as thou art, sometime was I. supporting member
    The Wastrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    9,620
    Style
    Brazilian Jiujitsu
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Maybe I'm confused about the "Smith Machine". I've never used machines for lifts before so...erp.

    I walk in and look at this thing and the bar moves on an inward angle. So I think, "Sheesh, I can lean back into it and isolate quads so my already bowling ball gluteal muscles don't get any more prominent."

    Is this not a Smith machine?
    Normally, I'd say I was grappling, but I was taking down and mounting people, and JFS has kindly informed us that takedowns and being mounted are neither grappling nor anti grappling, so I'm not sure what the **** I was doing. Maybe schroedinger's sparring, where it's neither grappling nor anti-grappling until somoene observes it and collapses the waveform, and then I RNC a cat to death.----fatherdog

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,591
    Style
    BJJ
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    "inward angle" ?

    are you talking about a tru-squat machine ?
    (specifically designed to squat safely...hence its name)

    Whats generally called the 'smith machine' has a barbell locked into place (at either end) allowing it to move vertically up and down. No horizontal movement is possible.
    The Wastrel - So attractive he HAS to be a woman.
    - Pizdoff

Page 3 of 5 First 12345 Last

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO