Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
--
These scores seem out of line with the scoring guidelines found here.
Specifically, a score of 10 in Equipment implies the presence of a full ring or cage. Nothing on the website seems to indicate that these are present.
A score of 10 in Striking instruction explicitly indicates "Pressure-tested, full range striking and proven success in limited restriction, top level competitions" as well as instruction by "A-level competitors". While the website does indicate that the school's competition team travels "both locally, out of state, and abroad" [sic] it does not indicate under what ruleset they compete. Typically, karate tournaments are NOT "limited restriction" and few, if any, would qualify as "top level competitions". Similarly, none of the instructiors featured at http://www.pksa.org/instructors.html are recognizable as "A-level competitors", although the power to summon lighting could certainly be useful in a competitive venue...

Without a successful full-contact competition record, a score above 5 is unwarranted under the scoring guidelines for Striking instruction.
A score of 10 in Weapons instruction currently indicates "Regular (quarterly or less) skill testing via full contact, full range fighting, minimum safety equipment. (Pain, Blood, bone breaking and/or death)". This level of intesity with this frequency is exceptionally rare. The school website states that the weapons class "meets once a week and lasts 3 months long". A score of 10 is completely unwarranted here as well.Dave
Originally Posted by jnp




Reply With Quote











Posted On:
9/17/2007 1:41pm
Style: Tang Soo Do
PKSA