Tae Yun Kim

**Phrost** · Posted On: 7/14/2007 10:15am

Discussion thread for Tae Yun Kim. If you would like to add a comment, click the New Reply button

This article needs to be cleaned up, especially with bolded section headers, and to follow the set format (history/bio, controversy, current status, links).

**clarehoare** · Posted On: 7/20/2007 12:37am

Ok so anything that you think should be modified, if you can't go ahead and post it here..

Phrost, I will try to address this within the next week. Right now we have a free format timeline.. I will make it a lil more wiki-esque.

**Wolf** · Posted On: 7/20/2007 5:59am

I'm on the fence about the WhoAmI stuff. I would ask that you guys go through that with a fine tooth comb and remove anything you're unsure of. I formatted it a little nicer for you though. You should hit the edit button on that page to see what I did if you're unfamiliar with the wiki code for doing that stuff.

edit: Actually I think that section has to go. Without any evidence supporting those things it really has no place on .org. That site is quite a bit more serious, and those claims need evidence listed with them. I'm going to remove them for now. They can always be re-added later with the proper evidence.

**clarehoare** · Posted On: 7/20/2007 10:48am

Not a problem, I recommended on our that that if they would like to manage that list, they would need to do it in another thread, to help kkeep the thread on topic (as on topic as it has ever been).

One question, can we start another.org page for a list of claims, with a disclaimer that same at this point are unsubstantiated?

someone appears to have just went through the thread and wrote down any claim they saw stated.

**clarehoare** · Posted On: 7/20/2007 10:53am

Oh, and thanks for your work dividing this.

**Wolf** · Posted On: 7/20/2007 11:21am

we like to keep unsubstantiated claims away from .org as much as we can. That's what discussion pages like this are for. If you like add the list of claims to this thread specifically, then in the links section of the article add a link to that specific post here.

**Phrost** · Posted On: 7/20/2007 11:29am

Yeah, ORG is for 100% verifiable facts, with the sources for them. Interpretation and analysis is for Bullshido.COM.

**clarehoare** · Posted On: 7/20/2007 12:33pm

thx guys

**clarehoare** · Posted On: 7/30/2007 3:42am

Alright, did a little updating. Put some more relevant info in.

Everything on there is verifiable by two or more sources through the bullshido.net thread. Unfortunately there is no documentation of some experiences... There isn't anything I see as libelous. Sam has been reluctant to "approve" anything, but my own conscience tells me everything here looks hunky dory.