Results 101 to 106 of 106
-
Infidel
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Afghanistan
- Posts
- 2,294
- Points
- 6,130

Posted On:
6/15/2007 5:48pm
Style: Yoshinkan Aikido, MMA--
It works.1911 has a 7 round magazine and is almost 100 years old.
In a world where you can buy a Glock in every caliber and have at least twice the number of shots in a dual stack magazine, why bother with a 1911, nostalgia?
My grandfathers lever action rifle was registered pre WW1, I think 07 or 08 and in 20 years I've seen it used (and abused myself) I've never seen it jam once. It's just built solid.
People say the A10 warthogs is ugly too :)Personally, I think the 1911 is fairly ugly, but it works. -
Martial and Sexual Artist
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- San Diego, CA
- Posts
- 305
Posted On:
6/15/2007 6:36pm--
They are ugly. They also work very well. That's why the Air Force tried to de-commission them.
Sexy trumps effective.
There is a long history of ugly but [more]effective being retired so that new contracts(trough-feeding) can be given out, etc.
Let me count the ways...
A-10(almost!)
A-6(long gone)
Iowa Battleship(long gone)
m-113(massive pressure to kill it, but grassroots movement to upgrade it)
m1911(gone servicewide but still kicking where units have a choice)
Huey(making a comeback as the uh-1w)
Cobra(almost killed but back and new model coming ah-1z)
m-551 tank(Dead and buried, air-droppable tank? say what?)
Probably more out there, mechanics and **** probably have a ton of stuff they could list.Last edited by Sh0t; 6/15/2007 6:41pm at .
-
Middleweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Chesterfield, VA
- Posts
- 1,826
- Points
- 2,455




Posted On:
6/15/2007 9:39pm--
What about the issues with bullet setback in .40? IIRC, cycling a round of .40 just twice causes the bullet to set back in the cartridge far enough to increase the pressure of the round to unsafe levels.
Originally Posted by ysc87
I don't imagine that soldiers are in the habit of cycling ammunition, but I also don't think that soldiers in the field need anything else to worry about. -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Lafayette, IN
- Posts
- 961
- Points
- 1,475

Posted On:
6/15/2007 10:00pm
Style: BJJ/MT--
What's it matter? Most of the pistol jams I saw in my time in the army were stovepipes from limp-wristing. Then when they don't know how to clear it properly they screw it up worse.
Originally Posted by SUSHI SASHIMI
.45 is totally the way to go, we've got a lot of weapons that use it already. Just tell NATO to call it 12.something mm and quit whining.
The 1911s are a proven safe design. The main reason we're not likely to see them in the US army is that SA would make officers very very nervous. Never mind the fact that a light, crisp trigger pull improves accuracy. Never mind the fact that with modern 1911s the chances of an accidental discharge are so ridiculously low.
Plus our friends in Canada make some damn fine double stack .45s.
http://www.paraord.com/product/product.html?id=17Last edited by wetware; 6/15/2007 10:04pm at .
-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 78
- Points
- 1,854

Posted On:
6/15/2007 11:48pm



Reply With Quote











Martial and Sexual Artist
Posted On:
6/15/2007 5:06pm
Style: standup to ground