-
Ready are you? What know you of ready?
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Location
- SLC
- Posts
- 721
Posted On:
9/25/2002 1:20am
Style: EBMAS WT(& Prenatal Yoga)--
'There is a formal and respectful way of doing things in the martial arts.'
Oh Puhleeeze. . .Then what the **** are you doing on this forum?
'A sudden sneak attack gives you an advantage so it doesn't prove anything if you win.'
If you consider standing right in front of you with a piece of paper you published and telling you I want to kick your ass a sudden sneak attack, I hope to hell you never meet up with DJ's guy that is out looking for raisinet money, cause that would just be uncalled for and disrespectful.
'Sure Will should have always been ready to defend himself against a mugger that preys on speakers during speeches .. but come on'
What the ****? You talk like you were there. Speeches? I thought he was teaching a class? Speeches are for academics and politicians. He can challenged 'anyone, anytime', but god forbid don't interupt a fucking speech.
'its not like Emin beat him in a fair fight.'
Whatever that means, at least you like Miyamoto, so I'll have to give you some credit. -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Posts
- 8
Posted On:
9/25/2002 1:52am
--
Before William Cheung was beaten up by Emin, he was really considered to be the toughest man in the Wing Chun clan. Wong Shun Leung was once beaten up so badly by Cheung in a chi-sau match and it was film in 8-mm. In speaking of Wong, although he was considered to be a great fighter, mostly due to the fame of Bruce Lee, he was nothing but a piece of crap! People in the western martial arts world often cheated by his students by boasting how great Wong was in those "talk-hand" matches. The truth is, Wong had only fought in one open Kung Fu tournament in 1957 in Taiwan, and was knocked out in the 1st round! He couldn't even walked out of the ring and needed to be carried out by a stretcher. After that, he was named "Stretcher Wong" by the Hong Kong Kung Fu community.
-
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Posts
- 32
Posted On:
9/25/2002 4:47am -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 126
Posted On:
9/25/2002 7:08am
--
You guys are really obsessed with this lineage / different branches (WT/WC/VT)/ german incident thing, aren't you?
Here we should speak of the art (remember the first question was "what do you think about WC). You have had the inputs from people doing it, if you don't believe why don't you just try it and make your opinion on the art? -
9chambers
Guest
Posted On:
9/26/2002 3:56am
--
Little Idea,
>If you consider standing right in front of you
>with a piece of paper you published and telling
>you I want to kick your ass a sudden sneak attack
All is fair in love and war but not in boxing matches. When you challenge someone to a fair fight to prove that you are a better fighter than them, then you have set it up so neither of you has an unfair advantage. Its a fair fight or it proves nothing.
>What the ****? You talk like you were there.
>Speeches? I thought he was teaching a class?
When I have gone to classes in college, there is usually a guy in front speaking or lecturing. Cheung was demonstrating as a guest in a basketball gym. Anyway, I'll admit that he should have been ready. Who would go to demonstrate martial arts and not be prepared to fight .. whatever. Fine, he was being a lazy ass.
>Speeches are for academics and politicians. He
>challenged 'anyone, anytime', but god forbid don't >interupt a fucking speech.
He challenged them to a duel or a fair fight. I am sure he didn't say that anyone could come over and pounce on him in his sleep and slit his throat for raisinet money.
>I hope to hell you never meet up with DJ's guy
>that is out looking for raisinet money, cause
>that would just be uncalled for and disrespectful.
All is fair in love and war but not in boxing matches or formal duels. When you challenge someone to a fair fight to prove that you are a better fighter than them then you have set it up so neither of you has an unfair advantage ~ or it proves nothing.
>What the ****? You talk like you were there.
>Speeches? I thought he was teaching a class?
You really should read Will's version of the story. Its right here on McDojo.com. You can find it here:
http://www.mcdojo.com/article_read.asp?id=52
Here is a quote:
* When I started the second sort of technique drill, he came over again, and I noticed there's about 10-15 people walking behind and around him. And as soon as he came up, they went and formed a circle around us. And he said, "I want to fight you now." And I said, "Well, that's different. You said you wanted to spar and now you want to fight." I said, "Let's do it after class." And he began mumbling something, and I said, "Look, you know, I granted you the fight after the class. And strictly speaking, you're not even in my seniority." So I walked away, but I knew he more or less was going to try something. So after I walked away, the third step he rushed in and threw a round punch with his right arm."
.. sounds like a sucker punch to me.
Honestly, I don't care enough about this to download the video of the fight again but .. if I am right it starts as the fight has already begun. I wonder why they don't show the beggining of the fight.
I am not saying Will is the king of fighters, I am just saying that wonder boy Emin didn't prove a thing in that fight. I really don't give a crap about either one of them myself.
>> Perhaps it was because I had an inherent skill for the science and never deviated from natural principles. - Miyamoto Musashi 1643 -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Posts
- 8
Posted On:
9/30/2002 4:22am -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 126
Posted On:
9/30/2002 4:55am -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Posts
- 5
Posted On:
10/03/2002 3:46am
--
I trained in chuengs wing chun for about a year when i was younger.
It all seemed pretty cool and scientific.
But I have found(as with most trad martial arts) all the "science" falls apart when someone is belting you in the face.
I think most "stylized" MA's are good for a few moves at the start of the fight, then it becomes a brawl.
If you move ranges,(say into a clinch) then you can start your moves again, but it aint never like it looks in the demos.
And thats the big problem, most training is just like doing a freaking demo...block , punch , twist etc and the "bad guy" falls down.
A tough wingchun man who can throw good punches and is aggressive may be a good fighter, but i'd like to see just how much of what he is doing is "wing chun" after the first few blows.
If most wing chun people trained the way Thai or BJJ fighters do, it would be time much better spent.
And if they did, you might find that much of the "wing chuness" (a new word!) is dropped.
Edited by - jeffgord on October 03 2002 08:20:34 -
Titan
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 3,945
Posted On:
10/03/2002 4:05am--
That's one of the best posts I've seen.
Quote:
"I think most "stylized" MA's are good for a few moves at the start of the fight, then it becomes a brawl"
That is exactly what I try to tell people, I can only see WC being good when you use a pre-emptive attack. ie. a fast eye poke straight away before the guy knows what happened. But if you missed and the guy closes the distance and starts to grapple the pure WC guy is in deep ****. The Boztepe / Cheung video demonstrates this. (sorry to use that one again but it is an interesting clip)
Edited by - SLJ on October 03 2002 04:08:30"You realise the transformations give a man enough strength to destroy a truck with his bare hands!?
YOU HAVE BETRAYED ME, IN THE WORST POSSIBLE MANNER!!" - KiWarrior
"Sport ? That kind of thing's not my bag baby!" - Sammy Franco
"This system was developed with the help of notible BJJ fighter Ribbon Muchado." - "Sifu" Anthony Iglesias



Reply With Quote











Guest
Posted On:
9/24/2002 6:13pm