5/16/2007 8:57am, #21
Originally Posted by Nickeroon1987
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Lower Hudson Valley / Rochester
- punching bag / crew jitsu
I don't see how this makes my school any better or worse.
5/16/2007 11:23am, #22
Originally Posted by armory
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Washington State
- BJJ, Unauthorized Judo
Just like in TMA were you have people who don't want to do the hard work that it takes to be a fighter but want to be thought of as one (just trying/paying for the black belt); I see a lot of people looking for a way to do MMA without DOING MMA. I see a future were people go "Watch out, I do MMA" because they hit some Thai pads, focus mits, and learn some armbar and shrimp escapes; just like those people who go "Watch out, I do Karate" after they watched "The Karate Kid" and took a few classes at the local Y.
Balance will be key in making sure you don't have students diluting themselves as well as teachers who don't know better diluting the students into believing that they are just as prepared for a self defense encounter as the other students rolling and sparring. Again, it doesn't have to be "training for my UFC debut" level of sparring, but there has to be some resistance involved in the training.
Remember, like a previous poster said, there is always problems when bringing something to the masses.
One thing I am curious to see, however is retention. This is more of a general question not only to PMA and to you Joe but also to the school owners and students on this board. What happens if retention becomes an issue in this program. Would the temptation be there to "dumb" it down to increase retention. It's something a lot of school owners have had to confront so I'm curious what everyone's take is on that.
5/16/2007 12:23pm, #23
Originally Posted by kwowwRead this for flexibility and injury prevention, this, this and this for supplementation, this on grip conditioning, and this on staph. New: On strenght standards, relationships and structural balance. Shoulder problems? Read this.
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Porcupine/Hollywood, FL & Parmistan via Elbonia
- creonte on hiatus
My crapuous vlog and my blog of training, stuff and crap. NEW: Me, Mrs. Macho and our newborn baby.
New To Weight Training? Get the StrongLifts 5x5 program and Rippetoe's "Starting Strength, 2nd Ed". Wanna build muscle/gain weight? Check this article. My review on Tactical Nutrition here.
t-nation - Dissecting the deadlift. Anatomy and Muscle Balancing Videos.
The street argument is retarded. BJJ is so much overkill for the street that its ridiculous. Unless you're the idiot that picks a fight with the high school wrestling team, barring knife or gun play, the opponent shouldn't make it past double leg + ground and pound - Osiris
5/16/2007 8:22pm, #24
Joe's post from the armory makes me want to take my daughter to check out PMA to see for ourselves.
On the gi in public note - I too also often leave wearing the pants.
Once saw a grown man in the sporting goods section of a store - sporting a camoflage gi and wearing his black belt. Personally, I thought it looked arrogant, but then maybe it's just the way I was raised.
5/16/2007 8:55pm, #25
Originally Posted by kwoww
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Goju-Ryu, BJJ, MT
5/17/2007 8:24am, #26
As far as I know, the PMA Waco used to (maybe still does) have Phil Cardella come in to teach BJJ. I'm not entirely too sure about the rest of it... some of the kids stuff seems a little cheesy (I particularly don't like how the kid is holding the katana in the photo on their website, but hey, it's kids stuff.
I could go by and check out a class if you want to see what it's like.--
5/17/2007 8:41am, #27Originally Posted by Lane
As for wearing your uniform outside of class, I was taught that that is a big no no - disrespectful of the school (I guess because non-MA people seeing someone walking around in an MA uniform think "what a dickhead" and that reflects badly on the school). Wearing the pants outside has usually been OK at most school that I've been to.
My first instructor explained it as being in part a symbolic way to draw a distinction between what goes on outside the dojang and what goes on inside the dojang. When you put on your uniform, you are putting aside the events of the day outside the dojang that may distract you from your training (e.g. job, girlfriend, etc), and when you take it off, you are leaving behind anything in training that might negatively effect your performance outside of the dojang (e.g. frustration over getting pwned in sparring, being pumped over some new technique you just learned and wanting to try it out on your little brother, etc.). Yeah, it might sound cheezy, but rituals can serve a function in terms of socialization and how we interact with others or even perceive our environment. When I see kids in their uniforms with their belts tied running around Walmart, I usually get a bad impression about their instructor and school. I tend to think that either the school doesn't take what it teaches seriously or is arrogant and thinks that allowing its students to wander around in uniform is some sort of advertizing (invariably, the schools logo is emblazoned in large silk screening on the back of the gi/dobak top).
And before all the non-TMA guys jump in and say "what a crock of ****," what would you think if you saw some guy walking around the grocery store in boxing shorts and shoes and with hand wraps on?
Last edited by TEA; 5/17/2007 9:03am at .
5/17/2007 9:58am, #28
Guy Who Pays the Bills and Gets the Death Threats
- Join Date
- Jun 1998
- Cow Town
- MMA (Retired)
You don't have to spar to learn Martial Arts.
You have to spar to be good at Martial Arts.
And the problem of bullshido is almost always a result of the failure to make this distinction perfectly clear; whether it's:
* because a school is intentionally blurring (or covering up) this fact to attract/retain students
* because they sincerely (mistakenly) believe their students don't need to spar to prepare for a fight or self defense situation.
* because they just have low standards for what they're teaching and put little importance on the end performance ability of their students.
Here's an example:
We have a "newbie" class for adults and older teens, where they just learn basic techniques and fundamentals. We also have a kid's class where they roll/spar with other kids of their age group, varying from "push out" sumo style basic grappling, all the way to submissions and san shou rules or full sub grappling.
The other night, a teenage boy (around 15) came in early for the "noob" class and caught the end of the kid's class. He was given the chance to roll with one of the girls (14 or so). He'd apparently been going to the technique class for a few months.
He got absolutely destroyed by the girl who'd been doing full speed live rolling. Several times. In rapid succession.
Frankly, I haven't paid much attention to this so I'm not commenting on the individuals or particular issues involved here. But what needs to be said is this: if an organization is not mandating from the top down that the distinction between the merits of just learning techninques, and learning how to execute them against a fully resisting opponent be clearly explained to the students, it is not only wasting their time and taking their money, it is perpetuating the same garbage into the Martial Arts that we've been fighting for 5 years now.
Regardless of the brand, the packaging, or the fighting ability of those individuals who are running it.
5/17/2007 10:18am, #29Originally Posted by datdamnmachine
What I really like is how you generalize the idea of resistance across the board, the entire spectrum of arts. If people just understood that the way one trains is the key, not the art, knowledge would be key, not any particular chauvanism or agenda.
Retention of technique and a lot of other survival mechanisms like changing the technique in a pinch all come with feeling comfortable training under the right conditions.
5/17/2007 11:33am, #30Originally Posted by Phrost
We're missing a small point here Phrost. The point I'm trying to make is that you can have an seperate program focus specifically on fitness and be up front with the individuals and there's nothing wrong with that. The problem with the whole taebo craze was that there was some saying they could defend themselves taking the work out alone, they have since dropped this testimony knowing it was rubbish. (btw I've taken those classes to condition for a pro fight, they're excellent for cardio)
If you want to defend yourself you're going to have to go live and against resistance. On this board that has already been established. PMA actually acknowledges this but there is a group that doesn't want to go live, they don't really care about the self-defense, they're only interested in getting in shape. As I said before there are many activities that allow you to do this without having to go to the next level. Nobody's trying to fool anybody in thinking otherwise.
PMA is bringing in real instructors to teach real mma curriculums and real self-defense. You may not like every little part of the program but overall, from what I've seen, it looks pretty solid to me. Nothing personal guys but if you've never been a school owner or full time instructor you'd hardly understand it, it's like a non parent trying to tell a parent how to raise their kids. It looses it's flavor.